Section 462 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 462 Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.067 seconds)Abhay Lalan Vs. Yogendra Madhavlal
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-03-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1667
..... was committed there are of course exceptions to this rule simply because section 462 of the code is there to save decisions of courts which ..... code will become otiose not only that the application of section 462 arises only after the decision is rendered by a court ..... challenged the above order in this criminal miscellaneous case 2 sections 177 and 462 of the criminal p c 1973 read 177 every offence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMccarty Vs. Mccarty
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1981
..... s c 659 in 1977 however congress added a new definitional section 462 c providing that the term alimony in 659 a does not ..... beneficiary further the statute expressly provides that a payment under this section bars recovery by any other person of the amount paid 2771 ..... entitled under the law of the domicile of the deceased member section 2771 was designed to permit the soldier himself to designate a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHasumatiben Vs. Ambalal Krishnalal Parikh
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-05-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Guj324; (1982)2GLR346
..... reported in 1901 ilr 26 bom 109 it was held that section 462 old new order xxxii rule 7 of the civil procedure code applies to ..... 29 mad 309 it was held as under the provisions of section 462 old of the civil p c apply to compromise after decree ..... act are included in the expression proceeding used in sub section 1 of section 28 therefore original execution proceedings for recovery of possession between .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Sainath Reddy and ors. Vs. G. Narayana Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-29-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP247
..... the father was appointed as guardian ad litem of the minor section 462 of the old c p c of 1882 provided that no next ..... such an objection the learned judge also took the view that under sec 3 1 of the limitation act every suit preferred instituted appeal ..... for filing a suit or application for execution of a decree section 7 applies to cases where one of several persons jointly entitled to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Vs. Chhinga and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-11-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ885
..... even after the enquiry of the period of limitation prescribed in section 462 it was urged by sri tejpal that the provision like the ..... even after the enquiry of the period of limitation prescribed in section 462 it was urged by sri tejpal that the provision like the ..... of acquittal after the period of limitation prescribed in sub section 4 of section 417 the high court condoned the delay in filing the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-06-1981
Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)
orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York Vs. Belton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1981
to his exclusive control ante at 453 u s 461 462 n 5 if a police officer could obtain exclusive control
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEstelle Vs. Smith
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1981
in the circumstances of this case page 451 u s 462 1 the state argues that respondent was not entitled to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. Arizona
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1981
..... special meander corner on the extension of the east west centerline of section 14 t10s r22e sbm as shown on said plat thence continuing ..... n 2728 12 w 417 56 feet 240 n 2353 28 w 462 72 feet 241 n 2007 44 w 182 40 feet 242 ..... e 104 47 feet 461 s 1037 44 e 105 61 feet 462 s 2152 27 e 165 04 feet 463 s 2430 08 ..... n 2728 12 w 417 56 feet 240 n 2353 28 w 462 72 feet 241 n 2007 44 w 182 40 feet 242 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
..... treatment services or habilitation under programs assisted under this chapter will be protected consistent with section 6010 of this title relating to the rights of the developmentally disabled pennsylvania has submitted ..... providing inhumane care and treatment of the mentally retarded the bill of rights of s 462 represents this new direction and begins this reaffirmation id at 16519 see id at 16520 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial