Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 462 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 462 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.094 seconds)
Sep 02 1908 (PC)

T.R. Ganesha Rao Vs. T.V. Tuljaram Rao and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-02-1908

Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.380

..... of these considerations requires to be carefully considered apart from section 462 it appears clear that a bona fide compromise by a ..... present plaintiff no application was made to the court under section 462 civil procedure code to sanction the compromise and that as the minor ..... of the minor 6th defendant who is the present plaintiff section 462 applies to compromises made by a next friend or guardian .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1908 (PC)

Kanungoe Krishun Prosad Vs. Romesh Chunder Mandul and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-11-1908

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.467

..... the general law was even more favourable to a minor than section 462 c p c by the allahabad court in kalavati v chedi ..... that in order to make an agreement of compromise to which section 462 applies lawful it is necessary that the next friend or guardian ..... of the respondents in both courts civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 section 462 minor compromise by guardian of duty of court in giving sanction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 1908 (FN)

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-09-1908

137 u s 692 leeper v texas 139 u s 462 hallinger v davis 146 u s 314 mcnulty v california

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1908 (FN)

Butler Vs. Frazee

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-21-1908

brought an action against the defendant page 211 u s 462 in error in the supreme court of the district of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1908 (FN)

Venner Vs. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-1908

in the words of the court p 104 u s 462 because the appellant shows no standing in a court of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 1908 (FN)

United States Vs. Chandler-dunbar Water Power Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-20-1908

8 mich 18 water commissioners v detroit 117 mich 458 462 we see no plausible ground for the claim of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 1908 (FN)

Liu Hop Fong Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-20-1908

..... of such justice judge or commissioner his lawful right to remain in the united states section 13 of the act of 1888 25 stat 476 also provides that any chinese person ..... treaty and order his deportation without giving him a full opportunity page 209 u s 462 to assert his rights before a competent court there being no provision of the statute .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1908 (FN)

United States Vs. Thayer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-09-1908

..... this is the opinion expressed by the civil service commission in a note upon this section and the principle of our decision is similar to that recognized in several cases in ..... were put into the post by the defrauded person commonwealth v wood 142 mass 459 462 regina v jones 4 cox c c 198 but these stand on the analogy of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1908 (FN)

Great Northern Railway Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-1908

..... hitherto stated adequately shows the unsoundness of the proposition that that section manifests in any respect the intention of congress to depart from ..... is comprehensive it undoubtedly as we have said in the second section amends and reenacts the elkins act and enlarges in important ..... then rested the company requested an instruction page 208 u s 462 in its favor based on the grounds upon which it had .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 1908 (FN)

In Re Moore

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-20-1908

..... removal is only of those cases of which by the prior section original jurisdiction is given to the united states circuit courts but this ..... the united states shall extend to controversies between citizens of different states section 11 of the judiciary act of 1789 1 stat 78 granted ..... was bound by a consent decree it was said 168 u s 462 that infants are bound by a consent decree is affirmed by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //