Section 462 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 462 Year: 1908 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.094 seconds)T.R. Ganesha Rao Vs. T.V. Tuljaram Rao and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-1908
Reported in: 1Ind.Cas.380
..... of these considerations requires to be carefully considered apart from section 462 it appears clear that a bona fide compromise by a ..... present plaintiff no application was made to the court under section 462 civil procedure code to sanction the compromise and that as the minor ..... of the minor 6th defendant who is the present plaintiff section 462 applies to compromises made by a next friend or guardian .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanungoe Krishun Prosad Vs. Romesh Chunder Mandul and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-11-1908
Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.467
..... the general law was even more favourable to a minor than section 462 c p c by the allahabad court in kalavati v chedi ..... that in order to make an agreement of compromise to which section 462 applies lawful it is necessary that the next friend or guardian ..... of the respondents in both courts civil procedure code act xiv of 1882 section 462 minor compromise by guardian of duty of court in giving sanction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTwining Vs. State
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-09-1908
137 u s 692 leeper v texas 139 u s 462 hallinger v davis 146 u s 314 mcnulty v california
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTButler Vs. Frazee
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-21-1908
brought an action against the defendant page 211 u s 462 in error in the supreme court of the district of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVenner Vs. Great Northern Ry. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1908
in the words of the court p 104 u s 462 because the appellant shows no standing in a court of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Chandler-dunbar Water Power Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1908
8 mich 18 water commissioners v detroit 117 mich 458 462 we see no plausible ground for the claim of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLiu Hop Fong Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1908
..... of such justice judge or commissioner his lawful right to remain in the united states section 13 of the act of 1888 25 stat 476 also provides that any chinese person ..... treaty and order his deportation without giving him a full opportunity page 209 u s 462 to assert his rights before a competent court there being no provision of the statute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Thayer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-09-1908
..... this is the opinion expressed by the civil service commission in a note upon this section and the principle of our decision is similar to that recognized in several cases in ..... were put into the post by the defrauded person commonwealth v wood 142 mass 459 462 regina v jones 4 cox c c 198 but these stand on the analogy of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGreat Northern Railway Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1908
..... hitherto stated adequately shows the unsoundness of the proposition that that section manifests in any respect the intention of congress to depart from ..... is comprehensive it undoubtedly as we have said in the second section amends and reenacts the elkins act and enlarges in important ..... then rested the company requested an instruction page 208 u s 462 in its favor based on the grounds upon which it had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re Moore
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1908
..... removal is only of those cases of which by the prior section original jurisdiction is given to the united states circuit courts but this ..... the united states shall extend to controversies between citizens of different states section 11 of the judiciary act of 1789 1 stat 78 granted ..... was bound by a consent decree it was said 168 u s 462 that infants are bound by a consent decree is affirmed by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial