Section 397 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 397 Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 24,051 results (0.172 seconds)Vinodkumar Jacob, Pazhookudy House Vs. Pindimana Grama Panchayath
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-08-2010
..... v mukundan nair 2005 khc 1176 after considering the discretionary power under section 397 of the rules this court held as hereunder an exemption from ..... p2 it is relevant to refer to section 397 2 of the motor vehicles act it reads thus 397 fees 2 the claims tribunal may in ..... from payment of court fee in terms of the provisions under rule 397 2 of the kerala motor vehicles rules 1989 for short the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopi Vs. Biju
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-08-2010
..... v mukundan nair 2005 khc 1176 after considering the discretionary power under section 397 of the rules this court held as hereunder an exemption from ..... p2 it is relevant to refer to section 397 2 of the motor vehicles act it reads thus 397 fees 2 the claims tribunal may in ..... from payment of court fee in terms of the provisions under rule 397 2 of the kerala motor vehicles rules 1989 for short the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincable Net (Andhra) Limited and ors. Vs. Ap Aksh Broadband Ltd. and o ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-07-2010
..... company mr gupta submitted that unless appropriate orders were passed on the petitioners application under sections 397 398 402 and 403 of the companies act 1956 the petitioner company would completely lose ..... provisions of the civil procedure code were made applicable to proceedings before the company law board under section 397 of the act mr raghavan pointed out that in paragraph 63 of the judgment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuddu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2010
..... section 397 ipc as also under section 302 ipc read with section 34 ipc the appellant guddu has been convicted under section 392 ipc read with section 397 ipc section 302 ipc read with section 34 ipc and also under section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorakh Pandurang Mare Age 20 Yrs, and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-16-2010
..... nos 1 2 and 4 were convicted for the offence punishable under section 394 read with sec 397 and sec 34 ipc section 394 ipc provides that if any person in committing or in attempting ..... modified as follows accused no 1 gorakh is convicted for the offence punishable under section 394 read with section 397 and section 34 ipc and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFather Thomas and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-22-2010
..... of revision against such order is barred under sub section 2 of section 397 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 c whether ..... remedy of revision against such order is barred under sub section 2 of section 397 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 c the ..... interlocutory order not amenable to revisional power of the court section 397 2 cr p c specifically bars revision filed against interlocutory .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubrata Sen and anr. Vs. Nischintapur Tea Company Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-11-2010
..... vacated and the rationale for the application was to ensure that the petitioners in the sections 397 398 proceedings did not jettison the petition for extraneous considerations 11 the applicants in ..... submits that it is not inconceivable that after making the application for withdrawal of the sections 397 398 petition the applicants had a second thought or that the circumstances that such applicants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Kr Agarawal. Vs.
Court: Rajasthan Jaipur
Decided on: Dec-13-2010
..... infra 14 in a number of judgments this court considered in extenso the scope of sections 397 and 398 the following judgments could be usefully referred to a needle industries india ltd ..... for a collateral purpose it would amount to oppression under sections 397 and 398 e once conduct is found to be oppressive under sections 397 and 398 the discretionary power given to the company .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSantosh Kumar Dubey Vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2010
..... recovery of desi katta from the appellant has been disbelieved he cannot be convicted under section 397 ipc pw2 and pw3 have categorically deposed that appellant was armed with a desi katta ..... material irregularity impropriety or any illegality in the impugned judgment the minimum sentence provided under section 397 ipc is of seven years which has been awarded by the learned trial court and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD. Ramakrishna Rao S/O. Bangaraiah and ors. Vs. Lrr Hatcheries Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2010
..... for further litigation affecting the interests of the company since in a petition filed under sections 397 and 398 the interest of the company should be paramount and considering the pendency of ..... body is entrusted with the responsibility for resolving the disputes falling within the scope of sections 397 and 398 of the companies act on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial