Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 397 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 397 Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 38,072 results (0.149 seconds)
Oct 20 2004 (TRI)

Dr. S. Mangalam Srinivasan Vs. Mani Forgings Private Limited,

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Oct-20-2004

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas544

..... and b have been duly met before making such orders as it thinks fit under section 397 section 398 can be invoked in either of the two circumstances 1 that the affairs of ..... wherein the companies tribunal while considering the preliminary issue whether the petition is maintainable under section 397 held that it is necessary for a petitioner to make all the essential allegations in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2004 (TRI)

R. Balakrishnan and ors. Vs. Vijay Dairy and Farm Products

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Nov-18-2004

Reported in: (2005)125CompCas661

..... met before making such orders as it thinks fit under section 397 section 398 can be invoked in either of the following two ..... petition do not fall within the purview of section 397 398 o by virtue of sections 397 and 398 any member of a company may ..... reached between the parties would perhaps satisfy the requirements of section 397 398 the releifs sought by the petitioners seeking directions against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2004 (TRI)

Shri G. Govindaraj and Smt. G. Vs. Venture Graphics Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Sep-30-2004

Reported in: (2005)128CompCas632

..... member or members upon which the clb under sub section 2 of section 397 is to form an opinion as to whether the ..... of section 397 2 b a plain reading of the provisions of section 397 reveals that the clb may under sub section 2 of section 397 with ..... be passed in exercise of the equitable jurisdiction conferred by section 397 while dealing with decisions cited on behalf of the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 2004 (TRI)

Pearson Education Inc. (Formerly Vs. Prentice-hall of India Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Jul-26-2004

Reported in: (2004)56SCL365

..... attorney should be specifically authorized to file a petition under sections 397 398 of the act that decision no longer holds good ..... name contractual rights cannot be enforced though a petition under sections 397 398 therefore it would not be possible to direct the ..... such a direction cannot be given in a petition under sections 397 398 however this observation does not bar the petitioner to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 2004 (TRI)

Mausumi Bhattacharjee Vs. Anghaila Housing Pvt. Ltd., Sh.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: May-20-2004

Reported in: (2004)54SCL585

..... by the petitioner the learned counsel has submitted that for orders to be passed under section 397 of the companies act 1956 and granting relief against oppression the petitioner has to ..... board of directors on untenable grounds under the garb of alleging oppression or mismanagement under section 397 amp 398 of the companies act 1956 oppression of which the petitioner complains must relate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2004 (TRI)

Sh. Harish Kumar Berry Vs. S. Berry'S Automotive Udyog Pvt.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Aug-23-2004

Reported in: (2005)60SCL531

..... share holding in the respondent company and hence entitled to file the present petition under section 397 398 of the companies act 1956 the petitioner before immigrating to canada appointed his late ..... 20 wherein the madras high court formulated the following conditions for maintaining a petition under section 397 amp 398 of the act a it must be established that the oppression complained of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2004 (TRI)

Mrs. Renuka A. Kattar Vs. Gees Marine Products Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Jul-20-2004

Reported in: (2005)3CompLJ189

..... presentation the first petitioner can continue the proceedings before the clb the provisions of section 155 old or section 397 or 398 do not provide for substitution of any shareholder as a petitioner ..... proceedings even though such a shareholder by himself could not have presented a petition under section 397 for want of required share qualification the court has to only consider whether the petition .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2004 (TRI)

G. Haranadh Vs. Shri Laxmi Durga Paper Products

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Dec-03-2004

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas501

..... have given their authorisation to file the present company petition either under sections 397 and 398 or section 235 read with section 237 b the consent letter only speaks of the alleged manipulation ..... filing of a particular petition with particulars of complaints and for particular reliefs under section 397 or section 398 or under both members giving consent should have applied their mind to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2004 (HC)

Micromeritics Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. S. Munusamy

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-02-2004

Reported in: [2004]122CompCas150(Mad); [2005]58SCL301(Mad)

..... wound up the court therefore can pass appropriate orders under section 397 read with section 402 if it comes to the conclusion that the affairs ..... the impugned order learned counsel appearing for the respondents relying on sections 397 398 2 and 402 g and 402 h submitted that the ..... company law board is having wide power to pass orders under sections 397 398 2 and 402 of the act but according to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2004 (TRI)

Altek Lammertz Needles Limited, Vs. Lammertz Industrienadel Gmbh

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Mar-31-2004

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas108

..... the arbitral tribunal is bound by inter alia the act 1956 including the provision of section 397 398 and other related provisions other relevant laws and judicial precedents while adjudicating the ..... effect of reducing the petitioner from a majority to a minority shareholder the provisions of section 397 and 398 statutorily confer exclusive jurisdiction to the clb remedying these grievances and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //