Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 397 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 397 Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 3,935 results (0.104 seconds)
Aug 07 1982 (HC)

Hanuman Prosad Verma and ors. Vs. Stock and Finance Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-07-1982

Reported in: 1983(1)CHN25,[1985]58CompCas338(Cal)

..... thus a fresh application is necessary for starting proceedings under section 543 schedule xi petitions under section 397 or section 398 and section 543 schedule xi cannot be combined together or simultaneously made ..... the question of the court s jurisdiction to grant necessary relief under section 397 or section 398 or section 402 is not under consideration the only point that needs consideration is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1982 (HC)

Bhubaneshwar Singh and anr. Vs. Kanthal India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-12-1982

Reported in: [1986]59CompCas46(Cal)

..... submitted that the concept of just and equitable as applicable to the situations governed by section 397 is a restricted concept merely because there is dissatisfaction at being out voted or dissatisfaction ..... to oppression or acts prejudicial to the public interest in the circumstances a petition under sections 397 and 398 is the proper remedy 131 with regard to the alternative remedy of approaching .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1982 (HC)

Pramod Kumar Mittal Vs. Andhra Steel Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-02-1982

Reported in: [1985]58CompCas772(Cal)

..... indicate that the powers of the court under section 397 or section 398 read with section 402 cannot be read as being subject to ..... and their supporting affidavit was annexed to the main section 397 and section 398 application these facts have to be borne in ..... in this appeal as they were parties in the section 397 application which section gives the shareholders holding shares of certain percentage to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 1982 (HC)

Nagavarapu Krishna Prasad and anr. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-19-1982

Reported in: [1983]53CompCas73(AP)

..... district of do hereby give my consent to the presentation of a company petition under section 397 and section 398 of the companies act 1956 by nagavarapu krishna prasad s o chenaiah and ..... to obtain suitable orders from the supreme court ordered accordingly company winding up sections 173 188 4 379 2 397 397 2 398 399 3 433 and 439 of companies act 1956 and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 1982 (HC)

Jadabpore Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Bengal Dooars National Tea Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-27-1982

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas160(Cal)

..... was rs 49 689 the petitioner in the original application under section 397 of the companies act 1956 was holding about 49 percent shares ..... and misapplication of the sale proceeds of tea the application under sections 397 and 398 was presented to this court on the 3rd april ..... had refused to accept the grievance made by the applicant under section 397 of the companies act but the learned judge held that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 1982 (HC)

The State Vs. C.K. Gulhati

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Apr-08-1982

Reported in: 1982CriLJ1923

..... in its revisional jurisdiction whereas the intention of the union parliament in enacting sub section 2 of section 397 according to their lordships appears to be to secure prompt rather than perfect justice ..... of 1978 appears to be to secure not only prompt but also perfect justice unlike section 397 whereunder the concurrent jurisdiction vests in the high court and the sessions judge alone revisional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1982 (HC)

Makhdum Ali Vs. Mst. Nargis Bano and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-07-1982

Reported in: 1983CriLJ111; 1983(1)Crimes933; 1(1983)DLT100; 1983(4)DRJ39

..... magistrate the husband filed a revision in the sessions court under section 397 cr p c the additional sessions judge by order dated ..... merely because a revision was filed under section 397 in the sessions by the husband he is not disentitled ..... sessions judge are affirmed 19 order accordingly criminal procedure code 1974 sections 125 126 397 482 if the party which has been proceeded ex parte .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1982 (HC)

Mukhdum Ali Vs. Nargis Bano and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-07-1982

Reported in: 23(1983)DLT100

..... the order of the magistrate the husband filed a revision in the sessions court under section 397 criminal procedure code the additional sessions judge by order dated 30th september 1981 dismissed the revision petition ..... court in the third place he says that merely because a revision was filed under section 397 in the sessions by the husband he is not disentitled from invoking .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 1982 (SC)

Bhure Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-12-1982

Reported in: 1982CriLJ818; (1982)2SCC445

..... khan the appeal is therefore allowed and the appellant is quitted of the charge under sections 397 i p c and 395 i p c respondent sending panel of three persons for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1982 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-19-1982

Reported in: 1983(13)ELT895(Raj); 1982WLN(UC)247

..... the code not even section 397 can affect the amplitude of the inherent power preserved ..... that the inherent power of the high court under section 482 cr p c does not stand repelled when the revisional power under section 397 overlaps it was further observed that nothing in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //