Section 21 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 21 Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 26,196 results (0.374 seconds)Chimmanamada Ganesh Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-21-2011
..... for parties has held the accused guilty of offences punishable under sections 498 a and 302 of ipc and sentenced him to undergo ..... caused by the sickle and sticks pw 10 denied these suggestion 21 the evidence of pw 19 ramesh relates to the apprehension of ..... blood stained clothes were seized under mahazar 23 pw 21 shakuntala was the tahsildar pw 21 has given evidence about the inquest held by her .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2011
..... contended that in view of the provisions contained in sub section 9 of section 40a of the income tax act 1961 inserted by ..... body of individuals society registered under the societies registration act 1860 21 of 1860 or other institution for any purpose except where ..... cannot be benefitted by maintaining the account through such system 21 for the selfsame reason the decision of the supreme court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.M. Hamsakoya Vs. the Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Nov-24-2011
..... at the same time we do not think that the tribunal was right in invoking section 21 of the administrative tribunals act for restricting the difference in back wages by one year ..... the authorities vide annexure a 1 in quick succession vide annexure a 2 representation dated 21 10 2010 he has again requested the authorities for consideration of his case as there .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Selvi Vs. the Assistant Director (Rpli) and Another
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
..... nc in which it is stated as follows consumer protection act 1986 section 21 b jurisdiction ex gratia payment under welfare scheme of government refused complaint ..... is the appellant 2 complainants husband took a rpli policy from 2nd opposite party on 21 1 06 for rs 25 000 for 17 years by paying the premium of rs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHdfc Standard Life Insurance Vs. Sujatha and Others
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-01-2011
..... new delhi in which it was held as follows consumer protection act 1986 section 21 life insurance concluded contract policy underwritten and dispatched after death of proposer ..... in c c no 275 2007 after hearing the arguments of appellant side finally on 21 1 2011 this commission made the following order a k annamalai presiding member judicial 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. M/S. Sagar thermit Corp. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-14-2011
..... it was not specifically raised though arbitration proceedings commenced as per section 21 and 85 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 for short ..... k patil h s kempanna jj this mfa is filed under section 173 1 of mv act against the judgment and award dated 29 ..... disputes claims and pursuant to the order of this court dated 21 02 2003 the arbitral tribunal was constituted the respondents submitted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Chander Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through Its Chief Secre ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2011
..... ccs conduct rules 1964 nbsp hence you are liable for punishment under section 21 of the d p act 1978 the applicant was given chance to ..... nbsp it is against these orders that the present original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 has been filed 3 ..... the defaulter yet this pw has proved the absence vide dd no 21 which was got marked by w inspr gulshan kumari 3and4 pw .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh. Pritipal Singh Vs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2011
..... in 2000 it was held that the application of the petitioner would be barred under section 21 of the administrative tribunal act 1985 4 the tribunal also held that on merits the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.C.Raman and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2011
..... silicon or granite the licensees cannot be mulcted with any responsibility 14 under section 21 5 of the mines and minerals regulation and development act 1957 which is ..... by the respondent on 14 1 2003 and received by the petitioner on 21 1 2003 wherein a sum of rs 75 25 296 was levied ..... according to the petitioner there is no violation of either 4 1 or 21 3 or 4 or 4a or 5 of the mines and minerals .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Sreekumaran Nair Vs. the Union of India
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Oct-25-2011
..... due to financial crisis we do not find this reason worth considering in terms of section 21 2 of the cat act 1985 an oa has to be filed within one year .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial