Section 21 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 21 Year: 1902 Page 1 of about 467 results (1.473 seconds)New York City Vs. Pine
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-07-1902
..... appeared that the road had been constructed before the bill was filed section 21 of article 2 of the missouri constitution of 1875 reads that ..... as said by pomeroy in his work on equity jurisprudence vol 1 sec 418 the principle embodied remedial portion of equity jurisprudence remedial portion ..... like the act of parliament known as lord cairn s act 21 and 22 victoria june 28 1858 c 27 by which it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRothschild Vs. Knight
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-03-1902
..... s 340 the provisions relating to trustee process are as follows sec 21 when a person who is summoned as trustee has goods ..... immaterial finding no error in the record judgment is affirmed the sections of the insolvency laws of massachusetts under which the action ..... was originally brought in the superior court of massachusetts are sections 96 and 98 of chapter 157 of the massachusetts public .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJamna Kunwar Vs. Nasib Ali and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-18-1902
Reported in: (1902)ILR24All312
..... this agreement was a bar to the suit of plaintiff under section 21 of the specific relief act we are wholly unable to see ..... cantonment board is not a recognised school within the meaning of section 2 21 held the act is enacted to regulate recruitments and conditions of ..... to be operating at a higher level i e secondary level section 2 21 of the act defines the term recognised the last clause therein .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChabeli Ram Vs. Tej Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-24-1902
Reported in: (1902)ILR24All342
..... that no appeal is allowed by section 588 sub section 21 from an order allowing an objection under section 372 and secondly that the order ..... board is not a recognised school within the meaning of section 2 21 held the act is enacted to regulate recruitments and conditions ..... be operating at a higher level i e secondary level section 2 21 of the act defines the term recognised the last clause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWaliullah Vs. Wajih-ud-din,
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-08-1902
Reported in: (1902)ILR24All381
..... of the district judge in our opinion this objection must prevail under section 21 of act no xii of 1887 an appeal from the decree of ..... the district judge under the general clauses act no i of 1887 section 3 clause 13 value with reference to a suit means the amount ..... no xii of 1887 bengal civil courts act section 24 act no i of 1887 general clauses act section 3 clause 13 valuation of suit appeal suit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubba Naidu and anr. Vs. Badsha Sahib and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-1902
Reported in: (1903)13MLJ13
..... of this act now some of the rules and provisions are to be found in section 21 which speaks of contracts which cannot be specifically enforced and one of the contracts which ..... this contract being one extending over more than three years and therefore not capable by section 21 clause g of specific performance cannot be the subject of an injunction it seems to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJamna Bibi Vs. Sheikh Jhau and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-15-1902
Reported in: (1902)ILR24All532
..... and proceed with the disposal of the suit the order clearly does not come within section 588 sub section 21 inasmuch as it was not an order disallowing an objection under ..... civil procedure the order clearly does not come within section 588 sub section 21 inasmuch as it was not an order disallowing an objection under section 372 but then it is contended that the application .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. St. Louis Andc.; Trans. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1902
alleged difference between the findings of fact filed on march 21 1898 and those filed on may 14 1900 whereby it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReloj Cattle Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-17-1902
to be 21 231 hectares and a fraction instead of 21 203 and a fraction page 184 u s 635 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Styria
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-19-1902
quoted the court said that it page 186 u s 21 was not the duty of the master to delay action
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial