Section 21 - Judgment Search Results

Shri D.K. Agriwalla, Shri M.V. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... demand for the larger period is incapable of confirmation penalty under section 11ac would also not sustain the learned commissioner has not ..... to support the claim made by shri setalwad in para 21 of the said judgement the various situations in the presence ..... discussions the demand within the normal period would however sustain 21 we have earlier held that for such determination the valuation .....

Shri D.K. Ariwalla, Shri M.V. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC193

..... demand for the larger period is incapable of confirmation penalty under section 11 ac would also not sustain the learned commissioner has ..... to support the claim made by shri setalwad in para 21 of the said judgment the various situations in the presence ..... earlier discussions the demand within the normal period would however sustain 21 we have earlier held that for such determination the valuation .....

Shri Shiv Dayal and anr. Vs. Union Bank of India and ors.

Court: DRAT Delhi

..... to deposit rs 2 lakhs on or before 30th september 1998 under section 21 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act ..... babu khan panwar defendant no 6 that defendants 5 to 9 on 21 3 1996 deposited their title deed sale deed 16 3 1990 of ..... the union bank of india that one declaration and one affidavit dated 21 3 196 were also filed by defendants 5 to 9 admitting having .....

Santosh Kumar Agarwal Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2001]105CompCas976(Cal)

..... kutty 1982 1scr183 learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff contended that the three conditions under section 21 of the civil procedure code being 1 the objection was taken in the court of first instance ..... sheet made by the senior deputy superintendent of police central bureau of investigation on november 21 1995 as quoted above therefore since the arguments have been made by the defendant bank .....

Amit JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

..... not right while deciding the oa on merits overlooking the statutory provisions contained instructions in section 21 3 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 shri vadhavkar has argued mat the fixation of .....

Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Mohd. Ghouse MohinuddIn and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIAD(SC)734; AIR2001SC3424; [2001(91)FLR434]; JT2001(7)SC146; 2001LabIC3304; 2001(5)SCALE491; (2001)8SCC416; 2001(3)SCT1147(SC); 2001(3)SLJ479(SC)

..... that apart under the administrative tribunal act a period of limitation is provided for in section 21 in this view of the matter when the units formed the cadre pursuant to notifications .....

Udai Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... and set aside 12 the respondents have therefore not followed the procedure laid down under section 21 of the delhi police act 1978 read with the rules made thereunder nor complied with .....

Vijay Kumar Vs. Additional District Judge, Bijnor and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(3)AWC1874

..... k rathi j 1 the opposite party no 3 filed an application for release under section 21 a of u p act no xiii of 1972 being p a case no 7 .....

Amarjeet Singh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC2634; 2002CriLJ3509; 2002(80)ECC1; JT2001(10)SC540; (2003)11SCC498

1 the accused appellanthas been held guilty of an offence punishable under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment .....

Rafiq Ahmad Vs. Vth Addl. District Judge, Shahjahanpur and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(3)AWC1843

..... shahjahanpur the respondent no 2 moved an application for release of the said shop under section 21 1 a of u p act no xiii of 1972 against the petitioner the said .....