Section 11 - Judgment Search Results

Though Section 11 Has Been Subsequently Amended Vide Act Vs. Gram Panc ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

filed a petition under Section 7 of the Act (Annexure P-26) on 09.06.1981 and later a petition under Section 11 of the Act on 22.07.1982 (Annexure P-29).Both the petitions were decided by the common order, impugned in the … the petitions were decided by the common order, impugned in the present writ petition. In the petition under Section 11 of the Act, the assertion of the Gram Panchayat is that the land vest in Panchayat from the

The Petitioner Has Filed the Present Petition Under Section 11 of Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Jindal, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) seeking appointment of an

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. Vs. Isco Track Sleepers Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR918; 2003(3)ARBLR558(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR290; 2003(4)MhLj776; [2004]55SCL549(Bom)

above provisions are ultra vires,and unconstitutional being violative of Article 14of the Constitution, as they are arbitrary anddiscriminatory.4. Section 16 is under Chapter IV. The saidChapter deals with Jurisdiction of ArbitralTribunals. The section provides for competence ofArbitral