Second - Judgment Search Results

K.S. Krishna Vs. Second Appellate Authority and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(3)ALD710

..... act claiming reinstatement and consequential benefits before the competent authority 2nd respondent who directed the 3rd respondent to pay rs 70 ..... 1993 and was terminated from services by the calcutta branch 2nd respondent has no jurisdiction to decide the issue raised ..... hyderabad the 1st respondent was in error in observing that 2nd respondent has no jurisdiction to entertain the application of the .....

Ge India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Second Labour Court and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2008(4)CHN338,[2008(119)FLR903],(2009)IILLJ214Cal

debasish kar gupta j 1 this is an application filed by the respondent no 3 for payment of full wages...

Shri Shantilal Nagarwal, Ex. Mcelar Second Class Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR3069

..... is subject to control by judicial review the first ground i would call illegality the second irrationality and the third procedural impropriety that is not to say that further development on .....

Shobha Kant Chaturvedi Vs. Hon'ble the Addl. District Judge 2nd, Etawa ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(1)AWC568

..... and therefore the question of its demolition by the defendants did not arise in the second objection filed in the year 2005 the defendants submitted that the plaintiff had not given .....

In Re: Legend Technologies

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... the interest of third party does not suffer for the illegal action of the second respondent the second respondent further indulged in prejudicial acts of advising the bankers on sole authority ..... representative of the petitioner while initiating his arguments submitted o the petitioner and the second respondent being technocrats had initially commenced in may 1992 the business of designing and .....

K. Suresh Babu Vs. Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India and ors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(5)ALD479; 2008(5)ALT426; (2009)IILLJ382AP

..... the petitioner submitted his explanation on 11 4 2005 the 2nd respondent was not convinced with the explanation offered by the ..... written representation and made oral submissions on the fixed date the 2nd respondent ultimately passed an order dated 30 8 2005 imposing ..... the petitioner is totally untenable he also submits that the 2nd respondent has mis directed himself firstly when he straight away .....

Niranjan Reddy Vs. Mrs. Nukalapathy Sururlatha,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)3MLJ1363

..... at mylapore executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant is liable to be cancelled and set aside and ..... the written statement filed by the first defendant and ultimately the second defendant has prayed that the suit is barred by limitation ..... city civil court chennai which necessitated the plaintiff to prefer this second appeal 7 the following substantial questions of law arose for .....

P. Arunodhayam and K. Kanniammal Vs. Secretary to Government, Revenue ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(3)CTC563; 2008(5)MhLj1523

..... even after disposal of the writ petition petitioner approached the second respondent and requested for transfer of alternate lands by receiving ..... petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging the order of second respondent dated 30 5 2005 on the ground that ..... under article 300a of the constitution is violated 4 the second and third respondents filed counter affidavit wherein passing of .....

Sinhar Estate Builders P. Ltd. and anr. Vs. B. Nataraj

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]144CompCas368(Mad); [2009]89SCL422(Mad)

..... diverted the funds of the company to the other companies controlled by the second defendant and the second defendant had also resorted to falsification of accounts and under statement of income ..... dishonoured under such circumstances the contentions of learned counsel appearing for the appellants that the second defendant is not liable for the suit claim cannot be sustainable it is further pertinent .....

Chairman, Chennai Port Trust Vs. Presiding Officer, C.G.i.T. Cum Labou ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)ILLJ712Mad; (2009)2MLJ46

..... the terms of reference as extracted earlier came to be referred for consideration 4 the second respondent in his claim statement before the first respondent tribunal contended that he was employed ..... not permissible at all for the first respondent tribunal while considering the claim of the second respondent the first respondent tribunal failed to note that any such attempt for inducting persons .....