Second - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: second Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 2,693 results (0.107 seconds)Gyan Chandra Dwivedi Vs. 2nd Additional District Judge, Kanpur and ors ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-19-1986
Reported in: AIR1987All40
..... opposite party no 3 is a tenant of the first and second floor portion of the house the landlord filed an application for ..... the judgment rendered by this court allowing the tenant s petition secondly it was contended that in any case the landlord having failed to ..... passed by the prescribed authority as well as the iind addl secondly it was contended that in any case the landlord having failed to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. Vs. Second Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-30-1986
Reported in: (1986)18ITD226(Mum.)
..... 1 1951 20 itr 572 577 sc and m kr deivanayagam pillai v second addl ito 1959 35 itr 549 551 mad the learned commentators further ..... considered 1st what was the common law before the making of the act 2nd what was the mischief and defect for which the common law did ..... it was not allowable under section 37 1 of the act in the second case the gujarat high court was considering the case of a director .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEarl. W. Tallent Vs. Second Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-08-1986
Reported in: (1987)20ITD512(Mum.)
..... to the assessee in america would be taxable in india 15 we next take the second issue i e whether the amount reimbursed by the indian company would be income taxable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEstate of Late P.G. Mehta Vs. Second Assistant Controller of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-09-1986
Reported in: (1986)16ITD128(Mum.)
1 these two appeals pertain to the estate duty proceedings arising out of the death of shri p g mehta...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiddarth Agencies Vs. Second Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Jun-23-1986
Reported in: (1986)18ITD524(Mad.)
1 the assessee firm runs a poultry farm for the assessment year 1983 84 it claimed investment allowance on cages...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanpat Giri Vs. Second Additional District Judge, Ballia and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-07-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC589; 1986(1)SCALE21; (1986)1SCC615; [1986]1SCR15; 1986(1)LC287(SC)
e s venkataramiah j 1 we are principally concerned in this case with the effect of section 97 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecond Income-tax Officer Vs. S.S. Mathur
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-27-1986
Reported in: (1986)16ITD9(Mum.)
1 this is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the aac h range bombay 2 the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecond Wealth-tax Officer Vs. J.K. Babla
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-19-1986
Reported in: (1987)21ITD86(Mum.)
1 these four appeals all relating to the assessment year 1978 79 filed by the revenue even though relating to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtam Prakash Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-27-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC859; 1986(1)SCALE260; (1986)2SCC249; [1986]1SCR399; 1986(1)LC642(SC)
..... it is entirely inconsistent with our constitutional scheme since the forty second amendment india is a socialist republic in which feudalism can obviously ..... in the lineal descendants of the vendor in order of succession secondly in the co sharers if any who are agnates in order ..... and when the inferior right is sale in the superior proprietors secondly in the owners of the patti or other sub division of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Kerala and ors. Vs. Saroja and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-17-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Ker239
..... vitiate the finding in all such cases those factual findings could be interfered with in second appeal if there is acceptable evidence its insufficiency for the finding or the possibility of ..... proof against the appellants regarding dissolution in the first place written statement is not evidence secondly defendants 2 and 3 have colluded with plaintiffs thirdly their admissions cannot be proof against .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial