Second Offence - Judgment Search Results
“whether the Offences Under Sections 353 186 and 332 of the Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-01-2013
of the FIR on the basis of compromise for the offences against police officer under Sections 148, 149, 332, 353, 186
Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2007
Range-1, under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial Of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to
Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv.Against Eco.Offence
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
situations wherein the accused holds a plurality of offices. The second determination was in respect of the requirement of sanction, in … Acharya … Appellant Versus State Bureau of Inv. against Eco. Offence … Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1455 OF 201.(Arising out of
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
A.P. Mohammed Ali Vs. State Through the Central Bureau of Investigatio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2008
Reported in: 2008(2)CTC370
2. The petitioner, along with ten others, stands charged with offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 420, 467, 468, 471,
P. Venkatesan and Another Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ(Crl)104; 2013(1)LW(Crl)470
Chennai, by a judgment dated 09.03.2006, convicted the first and second accused and imposed sentence together with fine, while acquitting the … file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore for the offence of buying the property from the main accused in C.C.
M.P. Chaturvedi Vs. M.P. State Economic Offence Bureau, Bhopal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
Criminal Revision No.1856/2012 18.03.2013 Applicant by Shri Brijesh Singh, Advocate. Respondent by Shri Pankaj Dubey, Advocate. Present revision has been...
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-02-2013
FIR No.02 dated 1.1.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 323, 341, 382 and 506 read
“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
dated 22.8.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That All the Offences Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
FIR No.106 dated 12.8.2011 on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under section 279, 337 and 427 IPC by the
Ashoo Surendranath Tewari and Another Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
of 2011, wherein the petitioners are being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 120B of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free