Second Class - Judgment Search Results

New York Vs. Class

Court: US Supreme Court

admonition of Justice Jackson: "[Fourth Amendment rights] are not mere second-class rights, but belong in the catalog of indispensable freedoms. Among William McNamee observed respondent Page 475 U. S. 108 Benigno Class driving above the speed limit in a car with a

Karans Gurukul Classes & Ors vs.gurukul Classes Iit Division & Ors

Court: Delhi

suit?. OPP (iii) Whether the use of the mark GURUKUL CLASSES IIT DIVISION by the defendants amounts to infringement?. OPP (iv)

Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature, Through, Its ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1998)2UPLBEC1059

not part of the Secretariat they would be considered as second category State employees.'Therefore, from the aforementioned two decisions of this The revised pay scales shall be made available to the class IV employees of this Court w.e.f. Ist July, 1994 (1.7.1994).

Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature and anr. Vs. ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(3)AWC2888

and, later on, affirmed by the Supreme Court. Consequently, a second writ petition, on the same issue and, on the same Bench Secretaries, etc. The Committee also recommended the pay-scale of Class IV employees. The relevant portion of the recommendation of the

Railway First Class Season Ticket Passengers Association Vs. Union of ...

Court: Kerala

ticket holders have a right to travel in air conditioned second class or sleeper coaches as of right and without having BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : COPY OF FIRST CLASS SEASON TICKET ISSUED IN FAVOURT OF 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE

Indian Rly. Class Ii Officers Feedn. and anr. Vs. Anil Kumar Sanghi an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3314; 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)869; 95(2003)CLT312(SC); [2003(96)FLR359]; JT2002(7)SC325; 2002LabIC3266; 2002(7)SCALE3; (2002)8SCC98; [2002]SUPP2SCR529; 2002(4)SCT453(SC)

of 1993, the present appeal has been filed by the second respondent in O.A., which is an Association of Class II accordance with Part II of the rules.(b) By promotion of Class II officers of the Signal Engineering Department. Not more than

Backward Class Employees Welfare Association of I.i.T. (M) Represented ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)5MLJ247

various names of faculties appointed on ad-hoc basis by the second and third respondents. No attempts were made to implead all or illegal burden is threatened and such person or determined class of persons is, by reason of poverty, helplessness or disability

Brilliant Classes Vs. Saroj Rawat

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

which was the advance fee taken by the appellant/OP for second year of coaching for which no services were rendered by the receipt dated 30.4.2008 had been issued by the Brilliant Classes and the rubber stamp affixed on the receipt is of

Medical Officer, Class - Ii Vs. State of Gujarat and 4 ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2009)3GLR2104

similarly reserved for candidates belonging to socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) students including widows and orphan children. The students desiring

Punjab Backward Classes Land Development and Finance Corporation Vs. P ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2000)124PLR554

of a scheme introduced for the uplift of the backward classes that Gurbax Singh was introduced to the plaintiff-bank for granting