Sec V Suter - Judgment Search Results

Lowe Vs. Sec

Court: US Supreme Court

Certain Publications, SEC Release No. IA-563, 42 Fed.Reg. 2953 (1977), codified at 17 CFR § 276 (1984); cf. SEC v. Suter, 732 F.2d 1294 (CA7 1984); SEC v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 422 F.2d 1371 (CA2), cert. denied, 398

Suter Vs. Artist M.

Court: US Supreme Court

argument, respondents notified the Court of the entry of a consent decree in the case of B. H. v. Suter, No. 88-C 5599 (ND Ill.), which they suggest may affect our decision on the merits, or indeed may … it incurs in administering foster care and adoption services, if it submits a plan for approval by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Among its requisite features, an approved plan must provide that it "shall be

Jones Vs. Habersham

Court: US Supreme Court

sense, that the gift fails. Saltonstall v. Sanders, 11 Allen (Mass.) 446; Suter v. Hilliard, 132 Mass. 412; De Camp v. Dobbins, 2 Stew. (N.J.) … Jones v. Habersham - 107 U.S. 174 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. Habersham, 107 U.S. 174 (1883) Jones v. … suspend the vesting, but only the payment and carrying out of the various legacies, bequests, and devises. 2. Section 2419 of the Code of Georgia of 1873 does not invalidate a charitable devise contained in a will

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

Morse v. Republican Party of Va. - 517 U.S. 186 (1995) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Syllabus MORSE ET AL. v. REPUBLICAN … See letter from Drew S. Days III, Solicitor General, to William K. Suter, Clerk of the Supreme Court, dated Oct. 4, 1995 (lodged with Clerk … the Justice Department, and (2) that it threatens to abridge First Amendment associational rights-are rejected. Pp. 227-229. 2. Section 10 of the Act-which does not expressly mention private actions when it authorizes the Attorney General to file

Chrisomar Corporation Vs. Mjr Steels Private Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

flag vessel Nikolaos S, Int. Sign: P3KT6(“the vessel”) managed in Greece by Suter Shipping and Trading Ltd.2. Chrisomar has sold and delivered to the vessel … by the 26th November 1999 and consequently, Chrisomar arrested the vessel in the port of Haldia, India for security of the above claim. THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS1 The shipowners hereby confirm that they owe to Chrisomar … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1930 OF2008CHRISOMAR CORPORATION …APPELLANT VERSUS MJR STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. The present appeal raises several interesting questions

Raj Kumar Singh Vs. State of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(93)DRJ195

of pajeb (P-10), 3 keyrings (P-11), one neckless broken (P-12), one mangal suter with pendent (P-13), one gold plated rakhi (P-14), one broken haar (P-15), … the Additional Sessions Judge dated 20.8.2001 in Sessions Case No. 297/1996 holding the appellants guilty of offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for committing the murder of Smt. Kiran Jain; as also for offence … 6th July, 1995, Suresh Chand Jain informed Police Control Room and PCR onward informed the Police Station concerned vide DD No. 28A, P.S. Model Town that at A-4, Gujrawala Town near Ashok Vihar, Part-I, Smt. Kiran Jain

Kishan Chand Chopra Vs. State and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 72(1998)DLT378; I(1998)DMC480

the Supreme Court on 28.10.1996 in Criminal Appeal No. 1894/96 titled as Sri Kishan Chand Chopra and Others v. State (Delhi Administration) and Others.3. Only those facts, which now are relevant for deciding the question arising for … the applicant. The applicant was given only a few articles namely, Mangle Suter, a locket, a pair of ear rings and, two bangles. Even later … quashing of FIR No. 56/90 registered at Police Station, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi on 21.3.1990 for offences under Sections 406/494/498A, IPC; to restrain the respondents from arresting the petitioners in connection with commission of the afore-mentioned offences

Murari Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1986WLN(UC)281

against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Swai Madhopur dated March 31, 1976 convicting the appellant under Section 302, IPC and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of … Kamla, the deceased Ganga Ram and the appellant Murari Lal were grazing their cattle in the forest of village Udana, P.S. Khandar, district Sawai Madhopur on July 30, 1975. The she-buffaloes of the appellant entered the field … injuries on the victim's dead body:External:(1) Stitched wound opposed by three thread suters 11 c.m. in length transversely place over nape of neck just near

Gonzaga Univ. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

unambiguously confer such a right upon the Act's beneficiaries. See, e. g., Suter v. Artist M., 503 U. S. 347 , 363; Blessing v. Freestone, … Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe - 536 U.S. 273 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2001 Syllabus GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ET AL. v. DOE CERTIORARI TO … do so here, that spending legislation drafted in terms resembling FERPA's can confer enforceable rights. FERPA directs the Secretary of Education to enforce its nondisclosure provisions and other spending conditions, § 1232g(f), by establishing an office and

Mcclaine Vs. Rankin

Court: US Supreme Court

construed by the Supreme Court of Washington as applicable only to contracts. Suter v. Wenatchee Water Power Company, 35 Wash. 1; Sargent v. Tacoma, 10 … the circuit court of appeals. 119 F. 110. This writ of error was then brought. The following are sections of the statutes of Washington in relation to limitations, as found in Ballinger's Code: "SEC. 4796. Actions can … McClaine v. Rankin - 197 U.S. 154 (1905) U.S. Supreme Court McClaine v. Rankin, 197 U.S. 154 (1905) McClaine v.