Seas Beyond - Judgment Search Results

insurance Company Vs. Sea

Court: US Supreme Court

Insurance Company v. Sea - 88 U.S. 158 (1874) U.S. Supreme Court Insurance Company v. Sea, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 158 158 (1874) Insurance Company v. Sea 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 158 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT...

Goa Sea Foods Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1991)98CTR(Ker)1; [1991]189ITR431(Ker)

on April 7/1981. The Income-tax Officer took the view that the objections were received by him one day beyond time and so declined to comply with the requirements of Section 144B(4) of the Act. He, did not

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Coch ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC590; 2001(73)ECC429; 2001(127)ELT649(SC); JT2001(1)SC394; 2001(1)SCALE88; [2001]1SCR184

RUMA PAL, J.The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the appellant was an exporter for the purposes of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported...

Hotel Sea Gull Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1506; (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN89; JT2002(3)SC195; 2002(3)SCALE29; (2002)4SCC1; [2002]2SCR576

Bhan, J.1. The appellant (writ petitioner before the High Court) being aggrieved by the Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Calcutta where under the Division Bench overturning the decision of the Single Judge has...

Sea Lark Fisheries Vs. United India Insurance Co. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)AWC772(SC); JT2008(2)SC139; 2008(2)SCALE137; (2008)4SCC131; 2008(1)LC247(SC); 2008AIRSCW2048; [2008] 2 SCR 346

a report was submitted after more than four months from the date of conducting the survey is also beyond our comprehension.11. A marine insurance policy requires an implied warranty of seaworthiness as is evident from Sub-section (3)

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)165CTR(SC)395

Ruma Pal, J.The question to be decided in this appeal is whether the appellant was an exporter for the purposes of section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported...

Southern Sea Foods Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDERSpecial Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 18408 of 2007:1. List after four weeks.Special Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 17150 of 2008:2. In this special leave petition, the revenue has raised the following questions stated to be substantial questions...

Sheshank Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(88)ELT626(SC); 1996(8)SCALE461; (1996)11SCC755; [1996]Supp8SCR802

S.B. Bharucha, J. 1. The principal judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka in the case of M/s. Kamath Packaging Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1153/92). In the other matters the...

M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Reli ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ), the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 26th December, 2014 directing the...

M/s. Sea Coral Clearing and Forwarding, Chennai Vs. The Commissioner o ...

Court: Chennai

it is submitted that the order of suspension passed by the respondent to suspend the licence, dated 05.05.2016, beyond the period of 90 days is ab-intio void and contrary to the provisions of the Regulation. The learned