Sea - Judgment Search Results

insurance Company Vs. Sea

Court: US Supreme Court

Insurance Company v. Sea - 88 U.S. 158 (1874) U.S. Supreme Court Insurance Company v. Sea, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 158 158

Goa Sea Foods Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1991)98CTR(Ker)1; [1991]189ITR431(Ker)

No. 84 of 1987.12. The references are disposed of as above.13. A copy of this judgment under the seal of this court and the signature of the Registrar shall be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Coch ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC590; 2001(73)ECC429; 2001(127)ELT649(SC); JT2001(1)SC394; 2001(1)SCALE88; [2001]1SCR184

was an exporter for the purposes of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported some of its products directly to foreign buyers but it was not an eligible export

Hotel Sea Gull Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1506; (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN89; JT2002(3)SC195; 2002(3)SCALE29; (2002)4SCC1; [2002]2SCR576

Panchayat sanctioned a plan to construct five stories (Ground floor + 4 floors) for the construction of Hotel Sea Gull through its owner Malay Kumar Guha under the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. The Hotel comprising of

Sea Lark Fisheries Vs. United India Insurance Co. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)AWC772(SC); JT2008(2)SC139; 2008(2)SCALE137; (2008)4SCC131; 2008(1)LC247(SC); 2008AIRSCW2048; [2008] 2 SCR 346

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.Appellant was the owner of a Sea Vessel known as 'Sea Lark'. The vessel was engaged for fishing purposes. Appellant obtained a loan from Canara

Sea Pearl Industries and ors. Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)165CTR(SC)395

was an exporter for the purposes of section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. The appellant processes sea foods. It exported some of its products directly to foreign buyers but it was not an eligible export

Southern Sea Foods Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties Southern Sea Foods Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Sheshank Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(88)ELT626(SC); 1996(8)SCALE461; (1996)11SCC755; [1996]Supp8SCR802

Packaging Ltd. before the High Court seeking a writ of prohibition restraining the Customs authorities from proceeding with search and seizure operations in their premises. The writ petition was dismissed by a learned single Judge and the

M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Reli ...

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties M/s. Sea Eagle Dredging Marine Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. Reliance Capital Limited and Another

M/s. Sea Coral Clearing and Forwarding, Chennai Vs. The Commissioner o ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayers in W.P.No.19312 of 2016: These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent connected with order in...