Screening - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: screening Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.018 seconds)Cce Vs. Ambika Screen Works
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: (2004)(117)LC984Tri(Delhi)
1 the appeals of the revenue are directed against the order in appeal no 491 493 ce ind appl i...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Calcutta Co-operative Labour Contract and Construction Society L ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-12-2004
Reported in: (2005)1CALLT608(HC)
..... come 10 according to the petitioners these two judgments have not been considered when this screening committee considered their claims and or rejected their claims the learned counsel for the ..... the engineering department whereas the petitioners admittedly all do work of coal washery nextly the screening committee admitted that in any case the contractor s labours were also eligible for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.S. Chauhan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jabalpur
Decided on: Jun-14-2004
Reported in: (2005)(1)SLJ353CAT
..... aforesaid de proceedings his case was again considered by the screening committee which met on 28 6 1996 for grant of ..... case was required to be considered by the next screening committee the next screening committee had considered his case on 28 6 1996 ..... five years acrs proceeding to the year of holding of the screening committee are considered taken into consideration for assessing the suitability .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKeval Kishan Mehra, Dishti Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-01-2004
Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC461
..... setting which could be used as filter elements and or screen printing from the statements of various persons relied upon as ..... under heading 5911 20 even if it performs the functions of screen printing etc f as regards advertisements labels and publicity material ..... under classification dispute for a particular end use i e screen printing no independently tested on the avail of cross examination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDishti Inds. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-13-2004
Reported in: (2004)(117)LC352Tri(Mum.)bai
..... setting which could be used as filter elements and or screen printing from the statements of various persons relied upon as ..... under heading 5911 20 even if it performs the functions of screen printing etc g as regards advertisements labels and publicity material ..... under classification dispute for a particular end use i e screen printing no independently tested on the avail of cross examination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Mineral Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-2004
Reported in: [2004(4)JCR30(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC172; 2004(5)SCALE345; (2004)6SCC281
..... the acceptable limits in such cases run of mine ore screened by dry screening i e without resorting to washing by water it is ..... boulders are crushed into 150 mm size and transferred to the screening plant where water is pumped for pollution control beneficiation and ..... the lumps are formed then there is spiral classifier and dewatering screening fine ore is segregated the slimes are then consigned to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeetika Gupta and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-23-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)JKJ382
..... large number of candidates that it could decide to conduct the screening test for restricting the number of candidates to a particular ..... b whether the selection is vitiated for non holding of screening test 47 mr sethi learned counsel for the petitioners contends ..... prescribed in the advertisement notice or by holding a written screening test the discretion vested in the commission does not appear .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.V. Thimmaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Oct-04-2004
Reported in: (2005)(2)SLJ113CAT
..... their outstanding merit and ability based on performance report according to the applicants the screening committee did not consider the performance report of the officers properly they have short ..... that the selection committee is empowered to assess the suitability of a person by screening his service record and personal interview the selection committee while scrutinising the service records .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshcroft Vs. American Civil Liberties Union
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-2004
..... internet it does so by requiring commercial providers to place pornographic material behind internet screens readily accessible to adults who produce age verification the court recognizes that we ..... has argued seriously that additional expenditure of government funds to encourage the use of screening is a less restrictive alternative second the majority suggests decriminalizing the statute noting the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGita Mahensaria Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-17-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)CHN327
..... of the proposal it further appears that the member secretary screening committee referred the proposal to the detaining authority on 25 ..... the ministry after more than five months and the central screening committee considered the proposal about two months and 14 days ..... about two months from the date when the member secretary screening committee referred the proposal to the detaining authority in my .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial