Screening - Judgment Search Results
Saroj Screens Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Ghahshyam and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-2012
Reported in: 2012AIRSCW2081
BAHADUR Seth Gopaldas Mohta, resident of Akola (hereinafter called the Lessor) of the ONE PART, and Messrs Saroj Screens Ltd., Amraoti, a joint stock company with limited liability, represented by Mr. Anandrao son of Yadararo, Managing Director,
Silver Screen Enterprises Vs. Devki Nandan Nagpal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-1969
Reported in: AIR1970SC669; (1970)72PLR583; (1970)3SCC878
K.S. Hedge, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises from the decision of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Revision No. 189 of 1966 on its file. Reported in ILR (1968) Punj...
Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vidya Dhar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 28, 2013 + FAO(OS) 119/2013 MULTI SCREEN MEDIA PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Dushyant Dave, Sr.Advocate, instructed by Mr.Vijay K.Sondhi, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Mr.Varun Pareek and
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Sowmya Screen Printers Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex., Erode
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-1997
Reported in: 1998(59)ECC126; 1998(97)ELT54(Mad)
ORDER1. Heard both the parties. 2. In the above writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of Declaration declaring that the proviso to Central Excise Notification No. 253/82-C.E., dated 8-11-1982 are illegal, arbitrary, void,...
The Screen Corpn. (1938) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Biswanath Deb and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-15-1993
Reported in: (1994)1CALLT427(HC)
also stated that 'we like to mention here that you are accepting rent by A/C payee cheques from Screen Corporation (1938) P. Ltd. As such, we think there should not be any difficulty in issuing receipts to
Silver Screen Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-09-1970
Reported in: [1972]85ITR578(P& H)
of frames for chairs14.971(ii)Cost of cloth, etc., for chairsincluding Rs. 600 for cloth, rexin and sewing charges of screen2,478(iii)Cost of sanitary fitting6,115(iv)Cost of electricity fitting885(v)Cost of oils and paints3,955(vi)Cost of cement, bajri & otherexpenses20,393 Total49,097The Income-tax Officer
Silver Screen Enterprises a Firm and ors. Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-21-1955
Reported in: AIR1956P& H203
This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and the petitioners before us are Messrs. Silver Screen Enterprises, a firm which carries on the business of exhibiting cinematograph films, and Badri Prasad Seth, the proprietor
Diamond Metal Screens Pvt. Ltd., Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Dec-06-2001
1. These are three appeals filed by M/s. Diamond Metal Screens Pvt.Ltd. The issue relates to modvat credit in all these appeals. Hence they are taken together and are
D.S. Screen Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-19-1990
Reported in: (1990)(50)ELT475Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara bearing No. 15/MP/89 dated 14-6-1989 ordering confiscation of S.S. wire mesh and P.B. wire mesh found from the fancy premises of...
Marquez Vs. Screen Actors
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-05-1998
Marquez v. Screen Actors - 525 U.S. 33 (1998) OCTOBER TERM, 1998 Syllabus MARQUEZ v. SCREEN ACTORS GUILD, INC., ET AL.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free