Screening - Judgment Search Results

innovative Tech-pack Ltd. Vs. Higher Level Screening Committee and anr ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2003]131STC498(P& H)

..... communication as an appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the higher level screening committee issuing the eligibility certificate and since according to the department this was filed beyond ..... of exemption certificate as mentioned in the earlier letter it appears that the high level screening committee while examining the application of the petitioner overlooked its request and did not .....

Dr. Sanjeev Mittal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2003P& H213

..... of internship though not required to be undergone by the petitioners the provision of screening test would not be applicable as condition precedent for obtainment of permanent registration iv ..... subjecting the petitioners to screening test who have acquired equivalent qualifications to the qualification of mbbs in india and .....

Rajhuns Upadhyaya, Member, Board Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur

Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ47CAT

..... basis of apars it is stated that the entire material which was available to the screening committee was considered and the procedure for undertaking the assessment of the officers for promotion ..... directing the communication of the downgrading of the apars it is further stated that the screening committee consisted of the chief secretary the additional chief secretary and the principal secretary had .....

Atam Parkash Vs. Silverton Cooperative House Building Society and Othe ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... p no 2 chb the name of the complainant was not screened by the screening committee constituted by the chb which fact was admitted by ..... it was pointed out that the complainants name was not screened by the screening committee constituted by o p no 2 chb 7 the ..... also taken a plea that it had no control over the screening committee which screened the names of the eligible members for the allotment of .....

Medical Council of India Vs. Indian Doctors from Russia Welfare Associ ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1565; 2002(2)AWC1120(SC); JT2002(2)SC589; 2002(2)SCALE521; (2002)3SCC696; 2002(2)SCT344(SC); 2002(1)UJ646(SC); (2002)2UPLBEC1161

..... arising in the present cases the regulations for conduct of the screening test and for issue of eligibility certificate by the mci to ..... a person seeking permanent registration shall not have to qualify the screening test if he or she had already qualified the same before ..... after 15 3 2002 shall be permitted to appear in the screening test in relaxation of this requirement provided he had taken admission .....

Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT65Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the physical or physico chemical operations include crushing grinding magnetic separation gravimetric separation flotation screening grading agglomeration of powders e g by sintering or pelleting into grains balls ..... advocate for the respondents has emphatically contended that the activities of crushing grinding screening and washing do not amount to manufacture of any goods attracting levy of .....

Surinder Kumar Vs. Union Territory Chandigarh and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2003P& H77

..... justice has been controverted it has been averred that before making decision by the screening committee the screening committee heard each and every society on these premises it is maintained that the ..... the society 14 learned counsel is unable to refer to any rule under which the screening committee may have been constituted however the registrar co operative societies having passed the order .....

Sandeep Verma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003(1)AWC474; (2003)IIILLJ164All; (2003)1UPLBEC364

..... were also engaged which shows that contract was only a smoke screen he further contended that attendance register was countersigned by officials ..... contract with respondent no 4 is either sham or smoke screen he submitted that for adjudication of the question that contract ..... as to whether the agreement is sham and only smoke screen cannot be adjudicated in proceedings under article 226 of the .....

Smt. Vallam Badia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ271CAT

..... temporary posts were not available or in some cases they were not even eligible for screening because the posts became available after the death under these circumstances the respondent widows are ..... in c category b railway casual labourers working in c category for five years be screened in c category and regularised c railway casual labourers attaining temporary status entitled for pensionary .....

Chevron U.S. A. Inc. Vs. Echazabal

Court: US Supreme Court

..... disabled person from advancing in the workplace such as using qualification standards that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability 12112 b 6 by that same ..... echazabal recognizes the generality of the language providing for a defense when a plaintiff is screened out by qualification standards that are jobrelated and consistent with business necessity and reasonable .....