Screen - Judgment Search Results

Hari Shankar Nai Vs. Screening Committee, Collectorate Kanpur Dehat an ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1999(3)AWC2156

..... in this writ petition is whether an employee can be compulsorily retired by the screening committee itself without there being an order passed by the appointment authority compulsorily ..... before the concerned respondents 6 the parties shall bear theirown costs service compulsory retirement screening committee passed order to compulsorily retire petitioner no requirements regarding notice period and .....

Marquez Vs. Screen Actors

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 5 1998 decided november 3 1998 the collective bargaining agreement between respondent union the screen actors guild sag and respondent movie producer lakeside productions lakeside contained a standard union ..... to support the union s activities as the employees exclusive bargaining representative b respondent screen actors guild sag or union is a labor organization that represents performers in the .....

M/S. Krishna Screen Art Vs. C.C.E. Ahmedabad-i.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

..... unnecessary details the relevant facts that arise for consideration that the appellant shri krishna screen print art main appellant is a manufacturer of processed fabrics processed on machines with ..... traders were in respect of the processed fabrics which were received from shri krishna screen print art the officers recovered documents under a panchnama and also conducted detailed investigation .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Barick Screen Corporation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1983]139ITR457(Cal)

..... there was no firm in existence in the name of barick screen corporation before 1954 neither the present partners were partners therein ..... of the view that the notice was addressed to barick screen corporation which did not mention the status the tribunal further ..... initiating the proceedings under section 34 in respect ofm s barick screen corporation in the status of an unregistered firm the tribunal .....

Lawlor Vs. National Screen Service Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... themselves beginning with paramount in 1939 however the eight major producers granted to national screen service corporation the exclusive right to manufacture and distribute various advertising page 349 ..... the district court held that petitioners were entitled to injunctive relief against national screen because the undisputed facts supported petitioners claim of unlawful monopoly footnote 2 as .....

innovative Tech-pack Ltd. Vs. Higher Level Screening Committee and anr ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2003]131STC498(P& H)

..... communication as an appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the higher level screening committee issuing the eligibility certificate and since according to the department this was filed beyond ..... of exemption certificate as mentioned in the earlier letter it appears that the high level screening committee while examining the application of the petitioner overlooked its request and did not .....

Saroj Screens Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Ghahshyam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012AIRSCW2081

..... hereinafter called the lessor of the one part and messrs saroj screens ltd amraoti a joint stock company with limited liability represented ..... take notice yours faithfully sd advocatecounsel for m s saroj screens pvt ltd the letter is self explanatory it clearly calls ..... resolution reads as under resolution no 137 since messrs saroj screen private limited has been paying from time to time ground .....

Manjit Singh, Ceo, Multi Screen Media Pvt Ltd. Vs. the State of U.P. a ...

Court: Allahabad

..... the petitioner manjit singh is chief executive officer ceo of multi screen media pvt ltd which is a corporate company registered in ..... television the petitioner being chief executive officer of the company multi screen media pvt ltd use to manage over all affairs of ..... defamatory episode the petitioner being chief executive officer of multi screen media pvt ltd was looking after the general affairs of .....

Vidya Dhar and ors. Vs. Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... appellate jurisdiction special leave petition civil no 9967 of 201 vidya dhar amp ors petitioners versus multi screen media pvt ltd respondent judgment altamas kabir c j i 1 the three petitioners ..... the said episodes accordingly the producers directors and distributors and all those connected with the screening of the aforesaid episodes on television shall ensure that there is no direct similarity of .....

Lawlor Vs. National Screen Service Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... charles lawlor and mitchell pantzer co partners trading as independent poster exchange petitioners v national screen service corporation no 632 supreme court of the united states february 25 1957 mr ..... under well settled principles precluded the entry of summary judgments adjudicating the defendant appellant national screen service corporation national to be an unlawful monopoly 238 f 2d at pages 60 .....