Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: schedule Sorted by: recent Page 84 of about 351,631 results (0.019 seconds)

Mar 14 2023 (HC)

Basangouda S/o Nigangouda Vs. Muddangouda S/o Ramangouda

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

- 1 - RSA No.7094 of 2010 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M.JOSHI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.7094 OF2010(DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: BASANGOUDA S/O NAGANGOUDA, AGE:72. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O DADDY COLONY, RAICHUR-584101. APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR KALLOOR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. MUDDANGOUDA S/O RAMANGOUDA, AGE:53. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O GARALADINNI, VILLAGE, TQ. RAICHUR-584103.2. MURALI S/O BASWARAJ, AGE:35. YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O ASKIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. RAICHUR-584101.3. SMT. NARSAMMA W/O BASWARAJ, AGE:58. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O ASKIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. RIACHUR-584101. RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 & R2 ARE SERVED; V/O DTD.16.08.2017 R2 IS TREATED AS LR OF DECEASED R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED2411.2009 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT JUDGE RAICHUR IN R.A.NO.28/2008, CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2023 (SC)

The State Of Goa Vs. Summit Online Trade Solutions (p) Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1700/2023 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.29890/2018]. THE STATE OF GOA APPELLANT VS. SUMMIT ONLINE TRADE SOLUTIONS (P) LTD & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.1701/2023 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.29891/2018]. THE STATE OF GOA APPELLANT VS. FUTURE GAMING AND SERVICES (P) LTD & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1702/2023 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.29892/2018]. 2 THE STATE OF GOA APPELLANT VS. PAN INDIA NETWORK LTD & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant is one of multiple respondents in W.P.(C) No.36 of 2017, W.P.(C) No.38 of 2017 and W.P.(C) No.59 of 2017, pending on the file of the High Court of Sikkim (hereafter the High Court, for short). Separate applications in the said three writ petitions were filed by the appellant seeking its deletion from the array of respondents. The appellant had pleaded in the said applications that, inter alia, a notification issued...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2023 (SC)

M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. V.b.r Menon

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.421 OF2022M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited Appellant(s) Versus V.B.R. Menon & Others Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.494 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.1695 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2039 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.1758 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.1912 OF2022JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: Since the issues raised in all the captioned appeals are the same and the challenge is also to the self same order passed by the National Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, (for short, NGT, Chennai), those were 1 taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. For the sake of convenience, the Civil Appeal No.2039 of 2022 is treated as the lead matter.3. This appeal is filed by an oil marketing company viz. the Reliance BP Mobility Limited incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.12.2021 passed by the NGT, Chennai in the Original...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2023 (SC)

Victory Iron Works Ltd. Vs. Jitendra Lohia

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1743 OF2021VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JITENDRA LOHIA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1782 OF2021JUDGMENT V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.1. These appeals arise out of a common Order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 Principal Bench dismissing two independent appeals filed by the appellants herein, against an Order of the National Company Law Tribunal2, thereby confirming an order of the Adjudicating Authority, in two applications, in the course of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process3. 1 For short, NCLAT 2 For short, NCLT 3 For short, CIRP 1 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Parties to the Litigation 3. The subject matter of controversy in these appeals is the land of an extent of about 10.19 acres at Ramrajatala Station Road, Howrah, West Bengal. M/s Energy Properties Private Limited4 which is the appellant in CA No.1782 of 2021 is the ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2023 (SC)

Ganesh Prasad Vs. Rajeshwar Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023(@ SLP (C) No.28377 OF2018 GANESH PRASAD .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAJESHWAR PRASAD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.1. Leave granted.2. For the sake of convenience, the appellant herein shall be referred to as, the Original Defendant or Defendant and the respondents herein shall be referred to as, the Original Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs.3. This appeal is at the instance of the Original Defendant of Suit No.154 of 2009 instituted by the Plaintiffs in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Eastern, District Ballia for possession of the suit property upon redemption of mortgage and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 04.07.2018 in the Civil Miscellaneous W.P. 1346 of 2015, thereby affirming the order passed by the Additional District Judge dated 25.02.2015, permitting the Plaintiffs to amend the plaint under the provisions of Order VI Rule 17 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2023 (HC)

Sr Bujji A K A Babu G Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - CRL.P No.12080 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12080 OF2022BETWEEN: SR BUJJI A K A BABU G S/O GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT23YEARS R/O WARD NO.13 BAGEPALLI TOWN TALUKA BAGEPALLI DISTRICT :CHIKKABALLAPURA-561207. PETITIONER (BY SRI. TIGADI VEERANNA GADIGEPPA., ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAGEPALLI POLICE STATION TALUKA BAGEPALLI DISTRICT : CHIKKABALLAPURA REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001.2. PEDDANANJAMMA W/O GANGAPPA AGED60YEARS R/O WARD NO.13 - 2 - CRL.P No.12080 of 2022 BAGEPALLI TOWN TALUKA BAGEPALLI DISTRICT : CHIKKABALLAPURA-561207. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S. VISHWAMURTHY, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.179/2022 REGISTERED BY BAGEPALLI POLICE STATION, CHIKKABALLAPURA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S363 376(2)(n), 344 OF IPC, SECTION4AND6O...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2023 (HC)

M/s Bata India Limited Vs. Mr C Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO.43854 OF2011(L-RES) BETWEEN M/S BATA INDIA LIMITED PLOT NO.474, 475 & 476, 4TH PHASE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BANGALORE56005 REP. BY ITS FACTORY MANAGER ...PETITIONER (BY SRI PARADEEP S SAWKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S R KAMALACHARAN, ADVOCATE) AND MR C VEERABHADRAPPA S/O CHANDRAPPA C/O T V SEETHARAM BUIDLING, NO.120, LGR EXTENSION, LAGGERE PEENYA POST BANGALORE56005 RESPONDENT (BY SRI K S SUBRAHMANYA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.12.4.11 PASSED BY THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN SERIAL APPLICATON NO.17/01 VIDE ANN-M. AND ETC. 2 THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON1512.2022, COMING ON FOR 'PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER' THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER The Present Writ Petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:"i) call f...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2023 (HC)

Sri K Jagannath Rao Vs. M J Vittal

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA R.F.A.NO.488/2008(PAR) C/W R.F.A.NO.489/2008(PAR) IN R.F.A.NO.488/2008 BETWEEN SRI S KRISHNA RAO SINCE DEAD BY LRS1a) SMT.K.BHAGIRATHI AGED ABOUT76YEARS W/O LATE KRISHNA RAO1b) SMT.BHANUMATI K RAO AGED ABOUT55YEARS D/O LATE KRISHNA RAO BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.341, 4TH MAIN, SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE-560 080. ...APPELLANTS [BY SRI ANANT MANDAGI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR A1(a AND b)]. 2 AND1. M J VITTAL AGED ABOUT81YEARS S/O LATE M J JIVAN RAO R/A NO90 9TH CROSS RAJMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION BANGALORE-560080 2 . SRI K JAGANNATH RAO AGED ABOUT47YEARS S/O SRI S KRISHNA RAO3. SRI K RAGHUNATH RAO AGED ABOUT41YEARS S/O SRI S KRISHNA RAO R/A NO5(OLD NO.341) UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE-80 4 . MRS SUNANDA NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT80YEARS W/O LATE S NARAYANA RAO R/A NO3A/274 ORIENTAL PARADI WHARENU APARTMENTS WELLINGTON5. MRS SU...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2023 (HC)

Sri S Krishna Rao Vs. M J Vittal

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA R.F.A.NO.488/2008(PAR) C/W R.F.A.NO.489/2008(PAR) IN R.F.A.NO.488/2008 BETWEEN SRI S KRISHNA RAO SINCE DEAD BY LRS1a) SMT.K.BHAGIRATHI AGED ABOUT76YEARS W/O LATE KRISHNA RAO1b) SMT.BHANUMATI K RAO AGED ABOUT55YEARS D/O LATE KRISHNA RAO BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.341, 4TH MAIN, SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE-560 080. ...APPELLANTS [BY SRI ANANT MANDAGI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR A1(a AND b)]. 2 AND1. M J VITTAL AGED ABOUT81YEARS S/O LATE M J JIVAN RAO R/A NO90 9TH CROSS RAJMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION BANGALORE-560080 2 . SRI K JAGANNATH RAO AGED ABOUT47YEARS S/O SRI S KRISHNA RAO3. SRI K RAGHUNATH RAO AGED ABOUT41YEARS S/O SRI S KRISHNA RAO R/A NO5(OLD NO.341) UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE-80 4 . MRS SUNANDA NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT80YEARS W/O LATE S NARAYANA RAO R/A NO3A/274 ORIENTAL PARADI WHARENU APARTMENTS WELLINGTON5. MRS SU...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2023 (HC)

Syed Ghouse Mohiyuddin Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF MARCH2023PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL W.A. No.1110 OF2021(GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SYED GHOUSE MOHIYUDDIN SHAH KHADRI AGED ABOUT48YEARS SON OF LATE PEER MOHAMMED SHAH KHADRI SAJJADA NASHEEN HAZRATH DADA HAYETH MEER KALANDAR RESIDENT OF JAMIA MASJID ROAD CHIKKAMAGALURU57710. ... APPELLANT (BY SMT. SHIRIN MERCHANT WITH SMT. SRUSHTI KADAM, ADVS., FOR SRI. ABDUL KHADAR & SRI. AJITH KULKARNI, ADVS.,) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING, BENGALURU56000. 2 . THE COMMISSIONER OF RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS IN KARNATAKA MAHADESHWARA BAHVANA ALUR VENKATARAO ROAD CHAMARAJAPETE, BENGALURU56001. 2 3 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU57710. 4 . THE TAHSILDAR CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU57710. 5 . SRI. GURU DATTATREYA PEETA DEVASTHANA SAMVARDHANA SAMITI DARAMASHREE NO.91 SHANKARAPUR...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //