Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2913-2915 OF2018PRASANTA KUMAR SAHOO & ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHARULATA SAHU & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.1. Since the issues involved in both the captioned appeals are interrelated; the parties are also same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Orissa, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. Both the captioned appeals are at the instance of the legal representatives and heirs of the original defendant No.1 (Late Shri Prafulla Sahoo S/o Kumar Sahoo) and are directed against the judgment, order and decree passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dated 5.05.2011 in AHO No.133 of 2000 by which the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants herein thereby affirming the judgment and decree...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5622 OF2009CCE, AURANGABAD APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8026 OF2022JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. These appeals, by the revenue, challenge two orders by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT hereafter).2. In the first appeal1, the assessee is M/s Videocon International (hereafter Videocon). CESTAT, by its impugned order2 in the first appeal, allowed Videocons appeal and held that the LCD panels imported by it are classifiable in Chapter Heading (CH) 9013.8010 [of the First Schedule to the Customs 1 CA56222009 2 Dated 06.01.2009 in Order No.A/46/09/CSTB/C-II2Tariff Act, 1975 (hereafter CTA)]., as Liquid Crystal Devices- as opposed to the revenues stand, that they are classifiable as 85.29 "parts of goods falling under heading 85.28" [television sets falling in heading 85.28].. Videocon manufactu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1948 OF2013Prem Kishore & Ors. ...Appellant(s) Versus Brahm Prakash & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: This appeal, by special leave, is at the instance of the original plaintiff (landlord) of an eviction petition filed under the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short, the Act 1958) and is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 04.05.2010 in the Civil Revision Petition No.1332 of 2002 by which the High Court allowed the revision petition filed by the defendant (tenant) thereby rejecting the plaint under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) on the ground that the eviction petition was barred by the principles of res judicata. Factual Matrix 2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summaried as under.3. It is the case of the appellants that the respondents herein were inducted as tenants o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.5145 OF2023(GM RES) BETWEEN: NEW HORIZON EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST100FEET ROAD, INDIRANAGARA BENGALURU 560 038 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE DR.MOHAN MANGNANI. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI UDAYA HOLLA, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI RAJENDRA M.S., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED NO.13, CHURCH STREET II FLOOR, MSR WEST PARK BENGALURU 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2 . THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK SIB ARCADE NO.61, WHEELER ROAD COX TOWN BENGALURU 560 005 REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT GENERAL MANAGER. 2 3 . AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER SARFAESI ACT AND ASST. VICE PRESIDENT FEDERAL BANK NO.3, CHURCH STREET, II FLOOR MSR WEST PARK BENGALURU 560 001. 4 . THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 5 . SRI B.V.SADANAND S/O VENKATASWAMY REDDY MAJOR. 6 . MRS.S.L.MANJULA W/O B.V.SADANANDA MAJOR. 7 ....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7188 OF2013UNNIKRISHNAN CV AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Aravind Kumar, J.1. Appellants are claiming promotion to the post of Superintendent BR Grade-I and Assistant Engineer as per Column 11 of General Reserve Engineer Force Group C and Group D Recruitment Rules, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as GREF Rules, 1982 for sake of brevity). Short facts necessary for disposing of this appeal are crystallized as under:2. Between 1977 and 1986, appellants came to be appointed to the posts of Overseers/Surveyor Draughtsman (Field and Topo) in accordance with the provisions of column No.7 of GREF Rules, 1982. The next promotional post from Surveyor Draughtsman/Overseers is the post of Superintendent Grade- II. Petitioners were possessing ITI certificate at the time of their appointment as prescribed under Column 7 of Schedule I of GREF Rules, 1982. On bein...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.14333 OF2022(GM - RES) BETWEEN:1. . AISHA MALIK D/O. AMEENA RAHIL, AGED ABOUT17YEARS. 2 . AHMED MALIK S/O. AMEENA RAHIL, AGED ABOUT14YEARS. BOTH RESIDING AT NO.34, SRI RAMA MANDIRA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004. REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. AMEENA RAHIL, RESIDING AT NO.34, SRI RAMA MANDIRA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU 560 004. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.SUDHARSAN, A/W SRI ANIRUDH A.K., ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110 001. 2 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, DC OFFICE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560 009. 3 . MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS UNION OF INDIA SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI - 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ADITYA SINGH, CGC FOR R1 AND R3; SRI B.V.KRISHNA, AGA F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2164-2172 OF2023(@Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.20781-20789 of 2021) TAJVIR SINGH SODHI & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VS. THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2182-2190/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.20790-20798 OF2021 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2191-2199/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.20799-20807 OF2021 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2200/2023 (@SLP (C) NO.976 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2173-2181/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.967-975 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2201-2203/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS. 6337-6339 OF2023 (@ DIARY NO.1194 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2204-2212/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.2642-2650 OF2022 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2213-2215/2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.3930-3932 OF2022 2 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. /2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.4359-4364 OF2022 JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J.Leave granted.2. I.A. No.21153/2022 for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner therein and I.A. No.21154/2022 for condonation of delay in filing I.A. No.21153/2022 are al...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). OF2023(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.6452 of 2021) ABHISHEK SINGH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HUHTAMAKI PPL LTD. & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT VIKRAM NATH, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant, a suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor1: Manpasand Beverages Ltd. (respondent 2), has filed this appeal assailing the correctness of the order dated 13.04.2021 passed by the National Company Law 1 In short CD 1 Tribunal2, Ahmedabad Bench at Ahmedabad in I.A. No.196 of 2021 arising out of C.P.(I.B.) No.503 of 2019 rejecting the application of the appellant under section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20163 for withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process4.3. CD is in the business of manufacturing and distribution of fruit beverages. It has approximately 700 employees and a turnover of Rs.984.96 Crores in the Financial Year 2018-2019. The Operational Creditor5 Huhtamaki PPL Ltd. (responde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - RSA No.1082 of 2022 C/W RSA No.1087 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1082 OF2022(INJ) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1087 OF2022SP) IN R.S.A.NO.1082/2022: BETWEEN: SRI THAMMANNAGOWDA, S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT66YEARS, R/O KIRAGADALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 571 424. APPELLANT (BY SRI G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: RAMEGOWDA, S/O MALIGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT66YEARS, R/O MAVINAKERE VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 211. RESPONDENT (BY SRI SANGAMESH R.B., ADVOCATE) THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0401.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.26/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN DISMISSING - 2 - RSA No.1082 of 2022 C/W RSA No.1087 of 2022 THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0503.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.160/2012 ON THE FILE OF ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - RSA No.1082 of 2022 C/W RSA No.1087 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1082 OF2022(INJ) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1087 OF2022SP) IN R.S.A.NO.1082/2022: BETWEEN: SRI THAMMANNAGOWDA, S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT66YEARS, R/O KIRAGADALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 571 424. APPELLANT (BY SRI G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: RAMEGOWDA, S/O MALIGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT66YEARS, R/O MAVINAKERE VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 211. RESPONDENT (BY SRI SANGAMESH R.B., ADVOCATE) THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0401.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.26/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN DISMISSING - 2 - RSA No.1082 of 2022 C/W RSA No.1087 of 2022 THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED0503.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.160/2012 ON THE FILE OF ...
Tag this Judgment!