Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.390 OF2023WITH I.A. No.50614 of 2023 :- Application for clarification of the order dated 08.08.2022 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.540 OF2022SWETAB KUMAR PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the petitioner seeking clarification of our order dated 08th August, 2022 to the effect that the mere filing of declaration under the notification dated 11.06.2020 does not preclude 1 the Competent Authority from taking steps under Chapter VB of the Wild Life (Protection) Act,1972 by means of amendment brought in the Act by Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022 and it shall be open for the Competent Authority to prosecute the said declarants and also take consequential steps of seizure and confiscation of the inventory declared under the said Advisory.2. In order...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.4897 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.4897 OF2023(LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:1. MRS. T G SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE RUDRAIAH H.V. AGED ABOUT72YEARS, 2. MR. UMASHANKAR B.R. S/O LATE RUDRAIAH H.V. AGED ABOUT55YEARS, 3. MR. DINESH KUMAR B.R S/O LATE RUDRAIAH H.V. AGED ABOUT50YEARS, 4. MRS. USHA H.R. D/O LATE RUDRAIAH H.V. AGED ABOUT49YEARS, 5. MR. PRASANNA H.R. S/O LATE RUDRAIAH H.V. AGED ABOUT48YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.805/A, 2ND CROSS, GOKULA1T STAGE, 2ND PHASE, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU 560 022. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIREESHA KODGI.,ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, - 2 - WP No.4897 of 2023 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SAUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE-2, NO.39, SHANTHI GRUHA, BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, PALACE R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.889 of 2007 Arup Bhuyan .. Appellant Versus State of Assam & Anr. .. Respondents With Review Petition (Criminal) No.417/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 With Review Petition (Criminal) No.426/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.889/2007 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5971/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5964/2019 With Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 2 With SLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.16637/2014 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5643/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6270/2019 JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Present reference to the larger Bench is made against the judgment and order in the case of Arup Bhuyan vs. Union of India, (2011) 3 SCC377as well as State of Kerala vs. Raneef, (2011) 1 SCC784 pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 26.08.2014, reported as (2015) 12 SCC702 Background of the Reference 2. That the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Raneef (supra) wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2502 OF2022MAH. ADIWASI THAKUR JAMAT SWARAKSHAN SAMITI APPELLANT(S) v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2772 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 25362537 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2533 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2532 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2534 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2518 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2517 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2525 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2520 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2527 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2526 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2538 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2541 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2535 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2546 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 39223923 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 25442545 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2512 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2543 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2542 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2529 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2540 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2539 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2503 OF20221 CIVIL APPEAL No.2514 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2519 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2524 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.2510 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6500 OF2008THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ANR. ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHANDAN DEB & ORS. ..RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6502/2008 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.6501 OF2008WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3985 OF2009WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3984 OF2009WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.5877 OF2022JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 29.08.2007 passed by the Gauhati High Court by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the writ appeals preferred by the 1 State of Tripura which were against the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge declaring Rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the TST Rules) as ultra vires to the Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the TST Act) and partly allowing the appeals preferred by the original writ petitioners quashing and setting aside that part of the jud...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4934 OF2022The State of Odisha & Ors. ...Appellant(s) Versus Radheshyam Agrawal Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.4936 OF2022WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.4935 OF2022JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Writ Petition Nos. 14922/2019, 10344/2021 and 20066/2019, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions preferred by the respective contractors original writ petitioners and has set aside the penalty imposed while granting the extension of time to complete the work 1 awarded, the State of Orissa has preferred the present appeals.2. For the sake of convenience, the facts in Civil Appeal No.4934/2022 arising out of the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in Writ Petition No.14922/2019 are narrated, which in a nutshell are as under: - 2.1 That th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH R.S.A. NO.697/2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: MR. SREENIVASMURTHY S/O. LATE MR. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, RESIDING AT L.H. PALYA, KALLAMBELLA POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 214. APPELLANT (BY SRI THONTADHARYA R.K., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . MS. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. OMKARA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT42YEARS, D/O. LATE KAMAIAH, RESIDING AT DODDABIDARE, C.H. HALLI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 214. 2 . MS. VASANTHAMMA W/O. KEMPAIAH, D/O. LATE KAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDING AT ALLAGHATTA VILLAGE, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 216. 2 3 . MRS. THAYAMMA W/O. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, RESIDING AT L.H. PALYA, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 137. 4 . MR. LOKESHA S/O. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, RESIDING AT L.H. PALYA, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 137. 5 . MRS. NETHRAVATHI W/O. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT28YEARS, RESIDING AT BUKK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5328-5329 OF2016SHRAMJEEVI COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DINESH JOSHI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.1877 OF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 12945 OF2019 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 409-410 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 407-408 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2370-2371 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10239 OF2018JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. Special leave granted in SLP (C) No.12945/2018. In all these appeals, all respondents were served and had entered appearance. The original applicant before the National Green Tribunal (hereafter NGT) too had been served; an 2 affidavit was filed on his behalf. He was however, not represented on the date of hearing. With consent of counsel for the parties, all appeals were heard finally.2. These appeals, under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereafter NGT Act) and appeals by special leave1, question various orders2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2402 OF2008GPSK CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED .APPELLANT(S) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MANTRI FINANCE LIMITED) VERSUS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5636 OF2007JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.Civil Appeal No(s). 2402 of 2008 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 15(Z) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992(hereinafter being 1 referred to as the Act 1992) assailing the judgment and order dated 9th August, 2007 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal(hereinafter being referred to as the Tribunal) affirming the order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai(hereinafter being referred to as the Board) dated 7th May, 2007 holding that the appellant did not satisfy the conditions of clause (4) of Schedule III of the Securities and Exchange Board of India(Stock Brokers and SubBrokers) Regulations, 1992(hereinafter being referred to ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - RFA No.100266 of 2015 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.DESAI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.100266 OF2015Between:1. Ramudu S/o. Sanna Basappa H/o. Gangamma Age:45 years 2. Venkatesha S/o. Nagappa H/o. Hanumakka Age:38 years 3. Sooranna S/o. Siddappa H/o. Gangamma Age:49 years Hanumanthappa S/o. Bommaiah, H/o. Lakshmakka since deceased by his LRS4 Maresha S/o. Late Hanumanthappa Age:40 years 5. Anjineya S/o. Late Hanumanthappa Age:37 years - 2 - RFA No.100266 of 2015 6. Mahadevi D/o. Late Hanumanthappa Age:46 years Aavula Ningappa S/o Nagappa, H/o Gangamma Since deceased by his LRS7 Gangamma @ Sanna Gangamma W/o Late Aavula Ningappa (Since deceased by her LRS) 7(a). Smt. Tippakka, W/o.LIngappa Age:32. years Occ: House Wife, U.Maran 7(b). S/o. Ningappa, Age:29. years, Occ: Coolie, Appellant 7(a) and (b) amended vide court order dated 11.04.2016.8. Nagend...
Tag this Judgment!