Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC775REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10611 OF2024Omkar Ramchandra Gond Appellant (s) Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Omkar Ramchandra Gond (the appellant) grew up in a middle-class family in the city of Latur in Maharashtra State. His father is a government servant. The appellant had a creditable academic performance in his tenth standard scoring 97.2%. He cleared his school final in the first division. The appellant aspired to be a doctor. Nothing wrong with it, except that he had to surmount a few legal hurdles enroute. 12. Admittedly, the appellant has speech and language disability and is diagnosed with Hypernasality with Misarticulation IN K/C/O Repaired Bilateral CLEFT of palate. The appellant is certified to have 45% (in some reports, it was mentioned as 44%) permanent disability as per the Disability Certificate dated 18.05.2017.3. The appellant applied for the Nationa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC769Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.3159-3160 of 2019 Neelam Gupta & Ors. Appellant(s) Versus Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. Respondent(s) With Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 517-518 of 2020 IN Civil Appeal Nos. 3159-3160 of 2019 Rajendra Kumar Gupta Appellant(s) Versus Neelam Gupta and Ors. Alleged Contemnors/ Respondents JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. The legal representatives of original defendant No.1 viz., appellant Nos. 1 to 3 herein and original Civil Appeal Nos. 3159-60 of 2019 Page 1 of 53 defendant No.2 in Civil Suit No.195A/95, are in appeal against the judgment dated 11.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Second Appeal No.401/2003, reversing the concurrent judgments of the Courts below and the consequently, drawn decree dated 25.07.2014.2. The facts, in succinct, that led to the impugned judgment and decree are as follows:- Respondent No.1 herein viz., Rajendra Kumar Gupta filed Civil Suit No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC773IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8315 8316 OF2014RENJITH K.G. & OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SHEEBA ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN, J.Heard Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs.Nishe Rajen Shonker, learned counsel for the Respondent.2. These Civil Appeals are preferred against the judgment and order dated 11.11.2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam1 in E.F.A Nos.6 and 7 of 1998, whereby, the High Court allowed the said appeals and remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh consideration.3. Succinctly stated facts are that the appellants are the legal representatives of the original plaintiff / decree holder viz., Padmakshy (deceased), who had filed a suit in O.S.No.38 of 1956 before the Sub Court, Parur, for partition and separate possession of her share in the plaint schedule 13 items of immovable properties. 1 Hereinafter shortly referred to as the High Cour...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC756REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2948 OF2023Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. Appellants versus M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd. & Ors. Respondents with WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 804 of 2022 & 1030 of 2022 CIVIL APPEAL No.2949 OF2023WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 1036 of 2022 & 90 of 2023 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.846 of 2023 and WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.847 of 2023 JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The issues which broadly arise in this group of matters concern clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023 etc. Page 1 of 91 the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the CGST Act). There is a challenge to the constitutional validity of the said provision. There is a prayer for reading down the said provision.2. In Civil Appeal Nos. 2948 and 2949 of 2023, the first respondent is engaged in the construction of a shopping mall for the purpose o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC753Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.1404 of 2023 Sukanya Shantha Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Contents I. The Writ Petition .................................................................................................. 4 II. Submissions ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Constitutional Interpretation ................................................................................. 6 IV. The Constitution of Emancipation, Equality, and Dignity ...................................... 9 V. The Contours of Article 14 ................................................................................. 17 VI. Non-Discrimination under Article 15 ............................................................... 23 VII. The Ban on Untouchability in Article 17 ...................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC748IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8617 OF2013V. VINCENT VELANKANNI .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 010944-010946 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 023121-023123 of 2024) CC No.3704-3706/2012 JUDGMENT Mehta, J.Civil Appeal No(s). 8617 of 2013 1. The instant appeal by special leave takes exception to the judgment dated 10th October, 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition1, whereby the Division 1 Writ Petition No.583 of 2011 1 Bench of the High Court accepted the writ petition2 preferred by the private respondents herein3 and reversed the judgment dated 24th December, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench4 in Original Application5 preferred by the private respondents herein. The CAT had rejected the Original Application6, challenging the proposed action of revision and fixation of their seniority in t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC739Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.4011 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.3986 of 2024) V. Senthil Balaji Appellant versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement ... Respondent JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 Leave granted.2. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 28th February 2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras by which a bail application preferred by the appellant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been rejected. The bail application was filed in connection with an alleged offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Criminal Appeal @ SLP (Crl) No.3986 of 2024 Page 1 of 25 2002 (for short, the PMLA), which is punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA.3. Between 2011 and 2016, the appellant was holding the post of Transport Minister in the Government of Tamil Nadu. B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 R C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2024BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.12683 OF2023C/W WRIT PETITION No.12691 OF2023(S-RES) IN W.P.No.12683/2023: BETWEEN:1. B.J.RANI, W/O RANGANATHA.C., AGED AOBUT42YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.489/A, NISCHITA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR17H CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BENGALURU SOUTH-560 068.2. SRI. AYUB KHAN.S.G., S/O GHOUSE KHAN, AGED39YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.570, BAZAAR STREET, KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.3. SMT. SHOBHA.K.R., W/O RAMAPPA.K., AGED43YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 R/AT No.9/A, PAPAIAH GARDEN9H CROSS, 4TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 R C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2024BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No.12683 OF2023C/W WRIT PETITION No.12691 OF2023(S-RES) IN W.P.No.12683/2023: BETWEEN:1. B.J.RANI, W/O RANGANATHA.C., AGED AOBUT42YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.489/A, NISCHITA NILAYA, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NEAR17H CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BENGALURU SOUTH-560 068.2. SRI. AYUB KHAN.S.G., S/O GHOUSE KHAN, AGED39YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU R/AT No.570, BAZAAR STREET, KENGERI, BENGALURU-560 060.3. SMT. SHOBHA.K.R., W/O RAMAPPA.K., AGED43YEARS, WORKING AS STAFF NURSE, JAYADEV INSTITUTE OF CARIOVASCULAR SCIENCES AND RESEARCH BENGALURU.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:40339 WP No.12683 of 2023 C/W WP No.12691 of 2023 R/AT No.9/A, PAPAIAH GARDEN9H CROSS, 4TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC730IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10804 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5843 of 2021) SHYAMSUNDAR RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PUSHPABAI NILKANTH PATIL & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed assailing the final order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (hereinafter shortly referred to as "the High Court") in Writ Petition No.4695 of 2017, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition, thereby affirming the order dated 26.10.2016 passed by the Court of 4th Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Thane, (hereinafter shortly referred to as the trial Court) in allowing the application filed by the Defendant No.46 for impounding the six documents produced by the appellants herein. 23. Originally, the appellants instituted a suit in Special Civil Suit No.200 of 2008 seeking declaration and injunction. Denying the plaint...
Tag this Judgment!