Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC437[NON-REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO (S). 348 OF2021PRITI AGARWALLA AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT S.V.N. BHATTI, J.I. FACTUAL MATRIX1 The Olympic Riding and Equestrian Academy, Eastern Jaunapur, New Delhi (for short, OREA), is a training facility for enthusiastic equestrian athletes. Mr. Kapil Nath Modi administers and runs the said training facility. Appellant Nos. 2, 3, 6 and Respondent No.2 were the trainee athletes in OREA. Appellant No.1 is the mother of Appellant No.2. Appellant Nos. 4 and 5 are the parents of Appellant No.6.2. Appellant No.2 was admitted for equestrian training into the Academy in June 2010. Appellant No.3 was accepted into OREA in the 1 year 2009. Appellant No.6 has also been receiving training in the Academy for a little over two years. Respondent No.2, a passionate athlete who dreamt of being the first Olympic champion of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC436IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.432 OF2023RAVIKUMAR DHANSUKHLAL MAHETA & ANR. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................... 3 i. Method of Promotion followed by the High Court of Gujarat ...................... 10 B. REFERENCE ORDER .............................................................................. 12 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS ...................... 14 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE HIGH COURT ....................... 16 E. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PROMOTED CANDIDATES .. 17 F. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION .......................................................... 20 G. ANALYSIS ..........................................................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC440IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 7315-7316 OF2021 CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA ..... APPELLANT VERSUS BHARAT PROCESS & MECHANICAL ENGINEERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND OTHERS ..... RESPONDENTS W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. ________ OF2024ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.1109 OF2024 JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.Permission to file the special leave petition by TPG Equity Management Private Limited, impugning the orders dated 09.03.2023 and 13.10.2023 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, is granted. Delay in filing of the appeals is condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant the Government of Odisha, has approached this Court against the judgment dated 03.03.2020 by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta, which upholds the directions given by the Company Judge, that the C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC454REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.414 OF2023IN CIVIL APPEAL No.11857/2016 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANOTHER APPLICANTS VERSUS M/S. K.L. RATHI STEELS LIMITED AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH MA No.808/2023 in C.A. No.12239/2016 R.P.(C) No.882/2017 in C.A. No.11846/2016 MA No.159/2018 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.396/2023 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.409/2023 in C.A. No.8511/2016 R.P.(C) No.410/2023 in C.A. No.8925/2016 R.P.(C) No.412/2023 in C.A. No.12114/2016 Page 1 of 90 R.P.(C) No.414/2023 in C.A. No.8898/2016 R.P.(C) No.416/2023 in C.A. No.4599/2016 R.P.(C) No.419/2023 in C.A. No.10206/2016 R.P.(C) No.418/2023 in C.A. No.8505/2016 R.P.(C) No.425/2023 in C.A. No.8929/2016 R.P.(C) No.428/2023 in C.A. No.8545/2016 R.P.(C) No.1731/2023 in C.A. No.9598/2016 R.P.(C) No.429/2023 in C.A. No.11256/2016 R.P.(C) No.431/2023 in C.A. No.9597/2016 R.P.(C) No.432/2023 i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC431IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1496 OF2023United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., an insurance company, challenges the decision by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter the NCDRC), which by its impugned order dated 16.01.2023 allowed the Consumer Complaint No.160 of 2019 and directed the appellant to release and pay an insurance claim of Rs. 39,09,92,828/-.2. Facts: The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), respondent No.3 herein, awarded a contract for the design, construction and maintenance of a cable-stayed bridge across the river Chambal on NH-76 at Kota, Rajasthan to a joint venture company comprising of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2. 1 The value of the project under the contract was Rs. 213,58,76,000/-. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC429IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) No.1025 of 2019 IN CIVIL APPEAL No.6567 OF2014LEHNA SINGH (D) BY LRS. . PETITIONER VERSUS GURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.The petitioner has preferred this Review Petition seeking review of the Order dated 13.03.2019 passed in Civil Appeal No.6567 of 2014 wherein the present petitioner was the respondent. In the Order under review, the Civil Appeal was allowed, and the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on 27.11.2007 in Civil Regular 2 Second Appeal No.2191 of 1985 was set aside and the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Sangrur, on 06.06.1985 in Civil Appeal No.27 of 1983 has been restored.2. In the judgment under review, this Court held that the judgment and decree passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is beyond the scope and ambit of Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 19081 on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC428IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) NO(S). 12842 OF2018MUKATLAL .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KAILASH CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Leave granted.2. The instant appeal by special leave challenges the final judgment and order dated 2nd November, 2017 passed by learned Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.1029 of 2006 whereby the appeal preferred by the appellant questioning the legality and validity of the judgment dated 21st July, 2006 passed by learned Single Judge of the 1 Rajasthan High Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1587 of 1993 was dismissed.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to by their rank in the Revenue Court.4. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the matter in the proper perspective, it would be beneficial to reproduce the genealogical table/pedigree of the families ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC427NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 4237 of 2015) S. SHIVRAJ REDDY(DIED) THR HIS LRS. AND ANOTHER APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. RAGHURAJ REDDY AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 23143-23144 of 2016) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.Civil Appeal @ SLP(Civil) No(s). 4237 of 2015 1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal is preferred for assailing the judgment dated 27th March, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, whereby the 1 learned Division Bench allowed LPA No.47 of 2002 preferred by respondent No.1- plaintiff.3. The status and rank of the parties to the lis is as below: - Party Name Position before Position in O.S. No.this Court 67 of 1999 S. Raghuraj Reddy Respondent No.1 Plaintiff M/s Shivraj Reddy Appellant No.6 Defendant No.1 & Brothers Late S. Shivraj Through his LRs Defendant No.2 Re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC434REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2608 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.121 of 2024) TARSEM LAL APPELLANT VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT JALANDHAR ZONAL OFFICE RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2609 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.191 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2610 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.698 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2611 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.330 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEALNO.2612 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.743 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2613 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.728 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2614 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.969 of 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2615 OF2024@ SLP (Crl.) No.3928 of 2024 JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.1. Leave granted. Criminal Appeal @ SLP(Crl.) 121 of 2024 Page 1 of 37 FACTUAL ASPECTS2 Since the issues involved are common and very little turns on facts, we broadly refer to the factual aspects. The appellants are the accused in complaints under Section 44 (1) (b) of the Prevention of Money Lau...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC450IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S).1008 OF2023TRISHA SINGH .PETITIONER(S) VERSUS ANURAG KUMAR .RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 The instant transfer petition came to be preferred by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 being Matrimonial Case No.2172/2022 titled as Anurag Kumar S/o Ravindra Nath Sharma Vs. Trisha Singh, pending before the Court of 7-Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi, U.P. to the Family Court at Pune, Maharashtra.2. The transfer petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 26th July, 2023. Subsequently, vide order dated 21st August, 2023, the transfer petition was restored to its original number and on the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter was forwarded to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for exploring 1 the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties. Pursuant to th...
Tag this Judgment!