Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.426 OF2023(IPR) BETWEEN: M/S BTV KANNADA PRIVATE LIMITED DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS, 2(A) SEEMANAZ, 2(B) KRISHNAPPA BABU, NO.38, MAHAGANAPATHI NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU-560010, PRESENT OFFICE AT NO.32/1-2, CRESCENT TOWER, CRESCENT ROAD, HIGH GROUNDS, BENGALURU-560001 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI SUNIL RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:1. M/S EAGLESIGHT MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (ESMPL) CHAIRMAN AND DIRECTOR, MR. ASHWIN MAHENDRA, DULY REP. BY HIS AUTHORIZED PERSON, MR. MAHENDRA B (FATHER OF ASHWIN MAHENDRA) VIDE LETTER OF AUTHORISATION DATED2401-2022 AGED ABOUT62YEARS, R/AT NO.301/10, 36TH CROSS, 7TH C MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGARA, 4TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560011.2. M/S EAGLE SIGHT TELE MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED DULY REP. BY ITS DIRECTORS, 1(A) KRISHNAPPA BABU, 1(B) NARAYAN RAVI KUMAR, NO.68, IST STAGE, 5TH PHASE, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA WRIT APPEAL No.231 OF2024(GM-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL No.230 OF2024(GM-RES) IN W.A. No.231 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . M/S. INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT: # A-601/602/605, 6TH FLOOR, 215 ATRIUM, KANAKIA SPACES ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI 400 093 REPT. BY ITS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, MR. SIDHHARTH SHAH. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI P.S. RAJAGOPAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SREEDEVI K.B. & SRI PATIL J.M., ADVOCATES) AND:1. . MS. JHANSIRANI VINODKUMAR W/O LATE VINODKUMAR, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, R/A No.59/4, 2ND BLOCK, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU 560 072. 2 . SRI VIJAY KUMAR M D S/O SRI MALLAN GOWDA, AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT KHB COLONY, - 2 - KUSHTAGI ROAD, SINDHANURU 584 128. 3 . SRI N.G. DEEPAK S/O LATE N.K. GUNDU ROAD, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, R/AT # 34, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA WRIT APPEAL No.231 OF2024(GM-RES) C/W WRIT APPEAL No.230 OF2024(GM-RES) IN W.A. No.231 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . M/S. INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT: # A-601/602/605, 6TH FLOOR, 215 ATRIUM, KANAKIA SPACES ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST), MUMBAI 400 093 REPT. BY ITS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, MR. SIDHHARTH SHAH. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI P.S. RAJAGOPAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SREEDEVI K.B. & SRI PATIL J.M., ADVOCATES) AND:1. . MS. JHANSIRANI VINODKUMAR W/O LATE VINODKUMAR, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, R/A No.59/4, 2ND BLOCK, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU 560 072. 2 . SRI VIJAY KUMAR M D S/O SRI MALLAN GOWDA, AGED ABOUT38YEARS R/AT KHB COLONY, - 2 - KUSHTAGI ROAD, SINDHANURU 584 128. 3 . SRI N.G. DEEPAK S/O LATE N.K. GUNDU ROAD, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, R/AT # 34, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :24. 04.2024 Pronounced on :04. 06.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.14704 OF2021(GM - RES) BETWEEN: SRI VIVEK JAIN S/O JNANCHAN JAIN, AGED ABOUT33YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3140, 6TH CROSS, KUVEMPU NAGAR, CHANNAPATNA TOWN 562 160. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SANDESH J.CHOUTA, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI NARENDRA P.R., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT HAVING OFFICE AT VIJAYA NAGAR, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA 562 159. 2 2 . THE PRESIDENT AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL, RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA 562 159. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 3 . SRI SRINIVAS S/O LATE S.R.SAMPATHU, AGED ABOUT74YEARS, RESIDING AT3D CROSS, KUVEMPU NAGAR, CHANNAPATNA TOWN 562 160. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 4 . SRI C.S.HARSHA S/O SRI SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDING AT4H BLOCK, 5TH MAIN, VIVEKANANDANAGARA CHANNAPATNA TOWN 562...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF MAY, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY W.P.No.8449/2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. KALAM NARENDRA S/O ANJANEYULU AGED28YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.308 3RD FLOOR, ROYAL HERITAGE APARTMENT, OLD MADRAS ROAD DOORAVANINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 016. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI HASMATH PASHA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI N.A. KARIAPPA, ADV.,) AND: UNION OF INDIA NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU BANGALORE ZONAL UNIT THROUGH ITS JUNIOR INTELIGENCE OFFICER BANGALORE. (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR NCB, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALROE - 560 001) RESPONDENT (BY SRI S. RAJASHEKHAR, ADV.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED IN NCB2CRIME No.NCB/F.NO.48/1/02/2024/BZU DTD. 05.01.2024 ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NCB WHICH IS FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS8c), 20(b)(ii)(A), 22(c), 27 AND28OF THE NDPS ACT AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW, WHICH IS PENDIN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC452REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2715 - 2719 OF2024(@ SLP (Crl.) Nos. 14036-14040 of 2023) UNION OF INDIA rep. by the Inspector of Police National Investigation Agency Chennai Branch APPELLANT(S) VERSUS BARAKATHULLAH ETC. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The Central Government in Ministry of Home Affairs, CTCR Division having received a credible information that the office bearers, members and cadres of Popular Front of India (PFI), an extremist Islamic organization have been spreading its extremist ideology across Tamil Nadu, by establishing State Headquarters at Purasaiwakkam, Chennai 1 and also offices in various districts of Tamil Nadu and that through their frontal Organizations like Campus Front of India, National Womens Front, Social Democratic Party of India etc., they conspire for committing terrorist acts, raise funds for committing terrorist activities and recruit members fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.29 OF2021SHAJI POULOSE .. PETITIONER VERSUS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.267 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.272 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.371 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.581 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.670 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1084 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1200 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1256 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1291 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1295 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1360 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2022T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 1 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.186 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF2022TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.28 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.30 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.31 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.33 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC447IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2668 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9052 of 2021) NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in Criminal Appeal (D) No.11/2020 dated 27.04.2021 by which the judgment rendered by the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency (NIA) (3rd Additional Sessions Judge) Jammu, has been confirmed in part, while remitting the issue pertaining to the charges framed under Sections 306 and 411 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code SVT., 1989 (hereinafter referred to as RPC, 1989) along with Section 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as UAPA, 1967) for taking cognizance afresh. 13. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC448REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3924 OF2023SUNITA DEVI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 3926-3927 OF2023CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3925 OF2023JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Criminal Appeal No.3924 of 2023 has been filed by the informant, against the order of remittal passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court directing the Trial Court to conduct a de novo trial, while making certain observations against the Special Judge, disapproving his approach in the conduct of the trial. Criminal Appeal Nos.3926-3927 of 2023 have been filed by the learned Special Judge who conducted the trial and thereafter 1 delivered the judgment. Criminal Appeal No.3925 of 2023 has been filed by the very same learned Judge, aggrieved over the remarks once again made by the High Court in an order of remittal, requesting the Honble Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to consider whethe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC439IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8978/2019 M/S SUNDEW PROPERTIES LIMITED APPELLANTS VERSUS TELANGANA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.THE CHALLENGE1 This is a statutory appeal before us under section 125 of the Indian Electricity Act, 20031. It registers a challenge to the judgment and order dated 27th September, 2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity2 1 Electricity Act 2 APTEL Page 1 of 24 dismissing an appeal carried under section 111 of the Electricity Act by the appellant from the judgment and order dated 15th February, 2016 passed by the Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission3. Consequently, the impugned judgment and order of the TSERC was upheld. BRIEF FACTS2 The basic facts giving rise to this appeal are not disputed. A brief overview of the facts and the trajectory of proceedings, relevant for a decision on the present appeal, are set out...
Tag this Judgment!