Court : Supreme Court of India
AP15of 2023 Reportable 2024 INSC536IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (CIVIL) No.15 OF2023Elfit Arabia & Anr Petitioners Versus Concept Hotel BARONS Limited & Ors Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (CIVIL) No.10 OF2023ORDER ARBITRATION PETITION (CIVIL) No.15 OF20231 The petitioner, an entity incorporated in the United Arab Emirates, was purportedly approached by the respondents to finance a telecommunication project undertaken by Telesuprecon Nigeria Limited (TNL). Accordingly, the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which forms the basis of the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 19961 was executed on 1 June 2004. TNL was represented by the second respondent, who is also a director of the first respondent a company incorporated in India. Pursuant to the terms of the MoU, the petitioners 1 Act 2 AP15of 2023 claim to have disbursed funds on various occasions. On 2 August 2006, a supplementary MoU was execut...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:25805 WP No.21349 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF JULY, 2024 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.21349 OF2022(GM-DRT) BETWEEN:1. H.V. GOPAL, S/O LATE N VENKATA JETTY, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, R/AT NO.232/28, 14TH MAIN ROAD, GOKULA1T STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 054.2. H.V. SURESH, S/O LATE N VENKATA JETTY, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, R/AT NO.232/28, 14TH MAIN ROAD, GOKULA1T STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 054.3. H.V. NAGARATHNA, D/O LATE N VENKATA JETTY, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, R/AT NO.232/28, 14TH MAIN ROAD, GOKULA1T STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 054.4. H.V. NIRMALA, D/O LATE N VENKATA JETTY, AGED ABOUT44YEARS, R/AT NO.232/28, 14TH MAIN ROAD, GOKULA1T STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 054. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. PRASHANT L. KANAL, ADVOCATE) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:25805 WP No.21349 of 2022 AND: THE BANGALORE SOUHARDHA CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NOW CALLED AS "TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC467IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8829 OF2010HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CANTONMENT BOARD, RAMGARH CANTONMENT & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Shri Manoj Goel, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Shri Manoj Swarup, learned senior counsel for the respondents were heard.2. The Title Suit No.9/89 of the plaintiff-appellant (Har Narayan Tewari) was decreed on 16.03.2000 by the court of first instance. In an appeal by the Cantonment Board, Ramgarh, the said decree was reversed by the First Appellate Court vide judgment and order dated 28.06.2006; basically on the ground that the suit was hit by principle of res judicata in view of the decision in the earlier Title Suit No.8/64 instituted by Maharani Lalita 1 Rajya Lakshmi1 (wife of Raja Bahadur Kamakshya Narayan Singh2) wherein the plaintiff-appellant was defendant No.32 and the Cantonment Board, Ramgarh was the main contesting ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC466IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7906 OF2010MAHESH CHAND BARETH & ANR. APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. RESPONDENT(s) With Civil Appeal No._____ of 2024 [@SLP(C) No.34742/2013]. Civil Appeal Nos. 8656-8668/2011 Civil Appeal No.9618/2011 Civil Appeal No.10709/2011 Civil Appeal No.10712/2011 Civil Appeal No.10711/2011 Civil Appeal No.10710/2011 Civil Appeal No.6898/2012 Civil Appeal No.1668/2012 Civil Appeal No.1038/2012 Civil Appeal No.11332/2011 Civil Appeal No.11442/2011 Civil Appeal No.11407/2011 Civil Appeal No.4559/2012 Civil Appeal Nos.6096-6104/2012 Civil Appeal No.8661/2012 Civil Appeal No.______ of 2024 [SLP(C) No.34663/2013]. Civil Appeal No.322/2013 Civil Appeal Nos.9328-9331/2010 1 Civil Appeal No.10281/2010 Civil Appeal Nos. 2800-2802/2011 Civil Appeal Nos. 2806-2808/2011 Civil Appeal No.2803/2011 Civil Appeal Nos.2804-2805/2011 Civil Appeal No.2980/2011 Civil Appeal No.2978/2011 Civil Appeal No.297...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC485IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3780-3781 OF2020SHASHIDHAR AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ASHWINI UMA MATHAD AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S.V.N. BHATTI, J.1. These Civil Appeals are filed against the judgment dated 16.10.2019 in R.F.A. No.3052 of 2010 and Cross-objection No.103 of 2011, on the file of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.2. The Respondents filed O.S. No.73 of 2004 in the Court of the Additional Civil Judge, Hubli, for partition of suit properties and allot half of one-third to each of the Respondents in all the suit properties. The suit properties are stated thus:1. Sl. No.Sy. No./CTS No.& Extent Village Remarks Ward No.1. CTS No.290 - Mantur Residential 2. CTS No.1108 Ward 87 Sq. Hubli -do- No.III1 Yds.3. CTS No.92A5, 616.2/- Hubli -do- Ward No.III4 CTS No.92A5, 200.2/- Hosur -do- Ward No.III Hubli 5. Block No.168/4 13A- Shiraguppi Agricultural 03 Gs. Bhandlwad land Village, Tq.Hubli 3. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:9388 RSA No.123 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF JULY, 2024 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.123 OF2008BETWEEN:1. SMT. HUSENBI W/O GAFARSAB BADAGI ( DIED ON2404-2017, HER LRS ARE A2 TO A4 ALREADY ON RECORD) NOTED AS PER ORDE DATED2901.2024.2. SMT. SHEREPONABI W/O USUFSAB MULLA, (DIED ON0611.2016) HER LRS ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS PER ORDER DATED2901.2024. 2A. SHABINA W/O KHALEEL AHMED, AGE:45. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O GANDHINGAR, HARIHAR, DIST: DAVANGERE. 2B. NAZIMA W/O ALLAHUDDIN, AGE:35. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O NEAR SRIKANTH THEATRE, HARIHAR, DIST: DAVANGERE2. NAGINA W/O ABU SALIYA, AGE:30. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O HARLAPUR, TQ. HARIHAR, DIST: DAVANGERE2. MUBINA W/O SIKHBUTHALLA AGE:28. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O GANDHINAGAR, HARIHAR, DIST: DAVANGERE.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC-D:9388 RSA No.123 of 2008 3. SMT. SHAKILABI W/O SATTARBEG AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O HOLEHARLAPUR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC478REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7247 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.16451 of 2023) Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited Appellant versus Samir Narain Bhojwani Respondent with CIVIL APPEAL NO.7248 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.20359 of 2023) and CIVIL APPEAL NO.7249 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.14238 of 2024) (Diary No.40494 of 2023) JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.1. The application for permission to file special leave petition is allowed. Leave granted. FACTUAL ASPECTS2 These appeals take exception to the same judgment and order dated 7th July 2023 passed by the High Court of Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.16451 of 2023, etc. Page 1 of 35 Judicature at Bombay. Therefore, the same are being decided together. We are setting out a few factual aspects necessary for deciding the appeals.3. On 31st March 1993, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC472Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2807 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6769 of 2017) Sardar Ravi Inder Singh & Anr. Appellants versus State of Jharkhand & Anr. ... Respondents JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.1. Leave granted. FACTUAL ASPECTS2 In substance, the appellants' prayer in this appeal is to quash the criminal proceedings of a complaint filed by the second respondent, Ganesh Kumar Agiwal. The present appellants are the trustees of Sardar Bahadur Sir Inder Singh (Personal Estate) Trust (for short, the Trust). The present appellants and one Gurdev Singh, as the trustees of the said Trust, entered into two separate agreements for sale dated 29th January 2001 (for short the agreements) in favour of the second respondent and one Uma Shankar Agiwal. In the agreements, the second respondent and Uma Shankar were described as the partners of Sri Mahakaleshwar Enterprises Criminal Appeal @ SLP (Crl) No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC477Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7426 OF2023The State of West Bengal represented through the Secretary & Ors. Appellants versus Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Ltd. Respondent JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The first appellant the State of West Bengal appointed the respondent as a contractor for the construction of a bridge. As there was a dispute between the parties, the respondent invoked the arbitration clause in the contract, and a sole arbitrator was appointed. On 30th June 2022, the Arbitral Tribunal passed an award directing the appellants to pay a sum of Rs.2,11,67,054.00 (Two Crores Eleven Lakhs SixtySeven Thousand FiftyFour Rupees Only) to the respondent with interest thereon, as directed. The counter claim made by the appellants was dismissed. The appellants Civil Appeal No.7426 of 2023 Page 1 of 8 received a copy of the award on the same day. The High Court of Judicature at Calcutta was closed ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :21. 06.2024 Pronounced on :05. 07.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE05H DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5073 OF2023BETWEEN: MR. M.SUBRAMANI S/O LATE SRI. MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT39YEARS R/AT NO.52, MADAPPANAHALLI KUGUR POST, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU 562 125. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOURABH R. K., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE HEBBAGODI POLICE STATION BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . MR. RAJA S/O ROBERT LOUIS AGED ABOUT57YEARS R/AT NO.533/A, 8TH MAIN24TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560 034. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B N JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SMT. JYOTHI S KEMPAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED0702.2023 IN C.C.NO.185/2023 PRODUCED IN ANNEUXRE-A AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS THEREIN, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LD...
Tag this Judgment!