Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC625IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2622 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) No.8081 OF2023 SHAJAN SKARIA APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - A. FACTUAL MATRIX ...................................................................................2 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ....................... 10 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT ................. 13 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE STATE................................... 15 E. RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS .......................................... 16 F. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION ......................................................... 20 G. ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 21 i. Evolution of the concept of anticipatory bail ................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:12068 WP No.103856 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION No.103856 OF2024(GM-RES) BETWEEN KISHORE S/O. BALDEV BAJAJ, AGE:61. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BAJAJ VILLAH BAJAJ AVENUE, A-01-A-09, SANGOLI RAYANNA NAGAR, TQ: AND DIST: DHARWAD-580002. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.M. SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI. BASAWARAJ S/O. NAMASAYYA RAMASWAMI HIREMATH, AGE:71. YEARS, OCC: RETIRED PROFESSOR/AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HIREMATH VILLA, SANGOLLI RAYANNA NAGAR, TQ: DHARWAD-580001. SMT. SAROJA W/O. SOMASHEKAR NEELAGAR, (SINCE DECEASED HER LRS ARE ALREADY ON RECORD AS RESPONDENT NO.2 &3) 2. SHRI SOHAN S/O. SOMASHEKAR NEELAGAR, AGE:27. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.504/4, VIJAYALAXMI BUILDING, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, M.B. NAGAR, KOPPADKERI, TQ: AND DIST: DHARWAD-580001.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC-D:12068 WP No.103856 of 2024 3. SMT. SUMAN D/O. SOMASHEKAR NEELAGAR, AGE:23. YEARS, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC647REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.294/2015 SALAM SAMARJEET SINGH Petitioner VERSUS THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL & ANR Respondent JUDGMENT1 Heard Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents High Court of Manipur and the Registrar General are represented by Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel.2. While deciding this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, there was a difference of opinion and having regard to the conflicting judgments rendered by the two learned Judges on 7.10.2016, the matter was directed to be placed before a three-judge Bench. Page 1 of 26 Thereafter, when a similar question of law was found pending before the Constitution Bench i.e., in Tej Prakash Pathak and Others vs. Rajasthan High Court and Others1 (for short Tej Prakash Pathak), this case was tagged with the said case. On 12.07.2023, however submission was ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:34036 MFA No.10896 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA MFA No.10896 OF2013(MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. Y. SUBRAMANYAM S/O. Y. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/AT: KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE GANGAVARAM MANDAL PALAMANER TALUK CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH BABU K N., ADV.) AND:1. MR. VALORU RAVI KUMAR S/O V. BASANNA, 6-354 KANEKAL VILLAGE & MANDAL ANANTPUR-515 001, A.P.2. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. NO.2-B, UNITY BUILDING ANNEX MISSION ROAD BANGALORE - 26 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A M VENKATESH, ADV. FOR R2 R1 SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED24.2013 PASSED IN MVC No.7795/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XI ADDL. JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE, (SCCH.NO.12), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.-. 2 - NC:2024...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC622IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 97-98 OF2012INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS RAJINDER SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition2 filed against the order dated 18.07.20033 passed by the Tribunal4. The Tribunal had allowed the application filed by the respondents, extending them the benefit of the scheme5 dated 27.02.1999 in terms of which a scientist was eligible for two advance increments as and when he acquires a Ph.D. degree in his service career. 1 High Court of Delhi 2 W.P.(C) Nos. 3364-65/2004 3 Passed in OA No.2939/2002 4 Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi 5 Order No.1 (15)98-Per IV of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi Page 1 of 122. Briefly the facts as are available on record ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC611IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of SLP(C) No.2111 of 2024) RAMNARESH @ RINKU KUSHWAH AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 2311-2312 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of SLP(C) No.2285 of 2024) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeals challenge the judgments and orders dated 22nd December 2023 and 12th January 2024 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Writ Petition Nos. 23998 and 23437 of 2023, and 23060 of 2023 respectively. By the said writ petitions, the writ petitioners 1 (appellants herein) had challenged the decision of the Respondent-Department of Medical Education of not allotting MBBS Unreserved (UR) Category Government School (GS) quota seats to the meritorious reserved candidates, who had passed from the Government Schools. The appellants ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - COMAP No.238 of 2024 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.238 OF2024BETWEEN: M/S SGK AGENCIES PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: SURVEY No.41, 42 AND43 PATTANAGERE, BEHIND VRL, MYSORE ROAD, BENGAULRU-560059 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. K. S. GEORGE. APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.K. SHRIKARA AND SRI. ANIKETH B.C., ADVOCATES.) AND: M/S BREMELS RUBBER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: PLOT NO127 128 AND129 3RD PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560058 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS.-. 2 - COMAP No.238 of 2024 1. MR NISCHIT B. SHETTY SON OF MR. BHASKAR R. SHETTY AGED ABOUT43YEARS, R/AT NO115A, 9TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION, SADASHIVANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560080.2. MR. ADITH B. SHETTY SON OF MR. BHASKAR R. SH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC607IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4064 of 1999 Mineral Area Development Authority & Anr. Appellants Versus M/S Steel Authority of India & Anr Etc. Respondents With Civil Appeal No.7937 of 2019 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.512 of 2018 With Civil Appeal No.7938 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.7936 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.6221 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.5250 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.729 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1029 of 2019 With Special Leave Petition (C) No.16028 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No.4286 of 2023 With Civil Appeal No.5682 of 2007 With Civil Appeal No.1295 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.874 of 2013 With Page 1 of 22 Civil Appeal Nos. 8269-8271 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8268 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8267 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.6135 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8272 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.9458 of 2013 With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18600 of 2013 With Civil ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:34811-DB RFA No.460 of 2017 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.460 OF2017(PAR) BETWEEN:1. M.S.Jagadeesh Aged about 56 years S/o late M.C.Someshwar 2. M.S.Narendra Aged about 60 years S/o late M.C.Someshwar 3. M.S.Jayadev Aged about 56 years S/o late M.C.Someshwar 4. M.S.Udayashankar Aged about 51 years S/o late M.C.Someshwar 5. M.S.Guruprasad Aged about 47 years 6. Smt. M.S.Padma Aged about 45 years All are residents of No.28, 1st Cross, New Bamboo Bazar, Medar Block, Mysore 570001. Appellants (By Sri Krishnamurthy G. Hasyagar, Advocate) - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:34811-DB RFA No.460 of 2017 AND:1. B.J.Jayasanthosh Aged about 30 years S/o. M.S.Jagadeesh 2. M.A.Harish Kumar Aged about 45 years S/o. M.V.Anantha 3. Smt. Lakshmamma Aged about 64 years W/o. M.V.Gnaneshwara 4. M.V.Shankar Aged about 71 years S/o. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC605IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.4 OF2024IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.645 OF2022IN RE : PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ACHARYA BALKRISHNA AND BABA RAMDEV IN THE MATTER OF : INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER PETITIONERS Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS JUDGEMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.1. This order shall dispose of the suo motu contempt proceedings initiated by this Court against the proposed contemnors, Patanjali Ayurved Limited1, Acharya Balkrishna, Managing Director of Patanjali and Baba Ramdev. The circumstances leading to initiation of contempt proceedings against the aforesaid parties needs some elucidation. 1 For short Patanjali Page 1 of 41 A. BACKDROP2 Indian Medication Association2, the petitioner in the writ petition3 has invoked Article 32 of the Constitution of India for raising a grievance against Patanjali, its Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna and its prim...
Tag this Judgment!