Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA WRIT PETITION No.27220 OF2023(GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION NO.670 OF2024(GM-RES) IN W.P.27220/2023 BETWEEN: SRI. BASANAGOUDA R PATIL (YATNAL) S/O RAMANAGOUDA B PATIL AGED ABOUT59YEARS OCC MLA, VIJAYAPURA CONSTITUENCY R/AT OLD IB, STATION ROAD VIJAYAPURA58610, KARNATAKA. PETITIONER (BY SRI. DALWAI VENKATESH - ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT (CRIMES, PRISONS & CINEMA) VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU56000.2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU NO36 BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU56003 REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE3 SRI D K SHIVAKUMAR S/O S K KEMPEGOWDA AGE60YEARS, OCC:MLA - 2 - ADD: NO252 18TH CROSS SADSASHIVA NAGAR BENGALURU56008.4. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. RESPONDENTS (BY S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA WRIT PETITION No.27220 OF2023(GM-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION NO.670 OF2024(GM-RES) IN W.P.27220/2023 BETWEEN: SRI. BASANAGOUDA R PATIL (YATNAL) S/O RAMANAGOUDA B PATIL AGED ABOUT59YEARS OCC MLA, VIJAYAPURA CONSTITUENCY R/AT OLD IB, STATION ROAD VIJAYAPURA58610, KARNATAKA. PETITIONER (BY SRI. DALWAI VENKATESH - ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT (CRIMES, PRISONS & CINEMA) VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU56000.2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU NO36 BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU56003 REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE3 SRI D K SHIVAKUMAR S/O S K KEMPEGOWDA AGE60YEARS, OCC:MLA - 2 - ADD: NO252 18TH CROSS SADSASHIVA NAGAR BENGALURU56008.4. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. RESPONDENTS (BY S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC657IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.3642-3646/2018 AKSHAY & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS ADITYA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT1 This set of five Appeals arises out of the common Judgment and Order dated 28-11-2017 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (here-in-after, referred to as NCDRC) in First Appeal Nos.1664-1668 of 2017, whereby the NCDRC has dismissed the said Appeals filed by the present appellants challenging the Judgment and Order dated 10-7-2017 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Nagpur (here-in-after, referred to as State Commission) in a Consumer Complaint No.85 of 2015.2. The appellants herein are the owners of the land in question. They entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Respondent No.2 Glandstone Mahaveer Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for the development of the land and for 2 construction of flats as mentioned herein.It a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.136 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.171 OF2022IN COMAP NO.136/2022 BETWEEN: NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.379 ROAD NO.10, JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD-500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR A S R MURTHY. APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA AND SRI. C K NANDA KUMAR SR. COUNSELS FOR SRI. HIDAYATHULLA M H - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR K H ROAD, SHANTINAGAR BENGALURU-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . SRI L V SREERANGARAJU NO.537, JESHTA 3RD MAIN HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS BANASHANKARI3D STAGE BENGALURU-560085. 2 3 . SRI R RAJAMANI FLAT NO.3, RAMPRIYA AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNANAGAR CHENNAI-600040. 4 . SRI T D MANAMOHAN NO.10, KAVERY THARALABALU ENCLAVE NEAR YELAHANKA OLD TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF20222024 INSC659REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9059-9061 OF2022V.S. PALANIVEL . APPELLANT Versus P. SRIRAM, CS, LIQUIDATOR, ETC. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.A. BACKDROP1 The appellant - V.S. Palanivel (shareholder/former Managing Director of M/s Sri Lakshmi Hotel Private Limited) has filed the present appeals against the judgment and order dated 16th September, 2022, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench1 in three Company Appeals2 preferred by him. The details of the said Company Appeals are (i) Company Appeal No.336 of 2021 (subject matter of Civil Appeal No.9059 of 2022) filed against the common judgment dated 17th November, 2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench3 rejecting an application4 1 In short Tribunal 2 Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins} No.336 of 2021; Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.339 of 2021 and Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC656IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) Nos.of 2024 ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.17948 OF2024NAVIN KUMAR & ORS. PETITIONERS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENTS WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.10295 OF2024WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(s). OF2024(ARISING OUT OF DIARY NO.20149 OF2024 WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(s). OF2024(ARISING OUT OF DIARY NO.20848 OF2024 WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.13756 OF2024WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(s). OF2024(ARISING OUT OF DIARY NO.36283 OF2024 WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(s). OF2024(ARISING OUT OF DIARY NO.37276 OF2024 2 ORDER1 In Devesh Sharma v. Union of India1 (delivered on 11.08.2023), there was before us a challenge to the judgement of the Rajasthan High Court dated 25.11.2021 where it was held that for appointment of primary school teachers (i.e., teachers of Class I to Class V), the essential qualification is D.El.Ed. (i.e., Diploma in Elementary...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC634REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13484-13488 of 2019) K. NIRMALA & ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CANARA BANK & ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 19877 of 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 23500-23501 of 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13453 of 2019) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Heard.2. Leave granted. 13. This batch of appeals, which involves identical questions of fact and law, arises from the judgments delivered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, as listed in the table below. Given the similarities, the appeals have been heard together and are being decided collectively. SLP No(s). Writ Date of Concerned Community Appeal Impugned Respondents/ (Scheduled No(s). Judgement Employer Caste/Scheduled Tribe) Special Writ Appeal 24th April, The Canara Kotegara (S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:34377 MSA No.24 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No.24 OF2019(RO) BETWEEN:1. H MAHADEV S/O G HANUMANTHEGOWDA MAJOR R/O HANUMANTHAPURA TUMKUR ROAD, KORATAGERE TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT APPELLANT (BY SRI G S VENKAT SUBBARAO, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. K N RAJAMMA W/O LATE I RANGASWAMY SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS1 SMT B R MANJULA DEVI D/O LATE I RANGASWAY AGED ABOUT48YEARS, R/O HANUMANTHAPURA KASABA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK-572 129 TUMKUR DISTRICT SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O EARANADAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS2 SMT GANGAMMA W/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT35YEARS, - 2 - NC:2024. KHC:34377 MSA No.24 of 2019 3. SMT ERAKKA W/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT33YEARS, 4. SMT NAGAMMA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT31YEARS, 5. SMT PUTTALINGAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT53YEARS, 6. SRI RAJU S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS, (2) TO (6) ARE ALL RESIDENT NEAR MARAMMA TE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC623IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1659-1660 OF2024M/S. KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..APPELLANTS Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..RESPONDENT INDEX S. No.Details Paras No.Page No.1. A. PREFACE12 1 2. B. FACTUAL BACKDROP33.10.5 2 3. 3.1 Joint Venture Agreement 3.1.1 3.1.4 3-9 4. 3.2 Correspondence 3.2.1 3.2.3 9-13 5. 3.3 Fuel Supply Agreement 3.3.1-3.3.3 13-18 6. 3.4 Memorandum of Understanding 3.4.1 3.4.2 18-21 7. 3.5 Washability Report of the Central 3.5.1 21-22 Institute of Mining and Fuel Research, Nagpur 8. 3.6 Revised Mining Plan 3.6.1 3.6.2 22-23 9. 3.7 Information submitted by KECML to 3.7.1 3.7.2 23-25 the Coal Controller 10. 3.8 Audit Objection raised by the CAG38.1 3.8.3 25-29 11. 3.9 Preliminary Enquiry registered by 3.9.1 3.9.2 29-31 respondent CBI12 3.10 Litigation between KPCL and 3.10.1 -3.10.6 31-33 KECML13 C. SUBMISSIONS14 4. Arguments by Counsel for the 4.1 4.17 33-42 ...
Tag this Judgment!