Satpal Singh V State - Judgment Search Results
K.B. Muhammed Vs. T.V. Achumma and Others
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-04-2016
petitioner referred us to the judgments in Jayarama @ Mamma v. State of Karnataka [2009 Crl LJ 4470], Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana [2010) 8 SCC 714] and Madan Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant [(2010) 9 SCC 209] to … State of Gujarat [AIR 1987 SC 1073]. Jayarama @ Mamma v. State of Karnataka [2009 Crl LJ 4470], Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana [2010) 8 SCC 714] Madan Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant [(2010) 9 SCC 209]
Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan Vs. Nawab Kazim Ali Khan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-07-2022
Matched in: Advocate KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA __ Mr. Aadil Singh Boparai, Shri. Aadil Singh Boparai
Murugan @ Settu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-2011
v. Mohinder Singh, AIR 2005 SC 1868; Vishnu @ Undrya v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2006 SC 508; Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana(2010) 8 SCC 714, and came to the conclusion that while considering such an issue and documents
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sanjay @ Pankaj vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2026
Amit Kumar, has been granted bail by this Court. To buttress his arguments, the learned counsel relies upon Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana : [2010] 9 S.C.R. 50; Kamal @ Kamal Choudhary v. The State of Madhya Pradesh :
Emmanvel Peter vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-20-2019
(1029 days) and going by the dictum laid down by the Apex Court and various High Courts in Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana, reported in 2010 (8) SCC 714, the delay would be fatal to the impugned proceedings, etc.5.
Smt. Archana Patil vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2025
be equated with other cases to quash proceedings or hold an accused not guilty. The Supreme Court, in Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana reported in (2010) 8 SCC 714 held that:“13. In a rape case the prosecutrix remains worried
State of Kerala vs Mohammed Riyas
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-04-2020
Additional Sessions Judge had applied his mind to the provisions contained in Section 37(1)(b) of the Act.17. In Satpal Singh v. State of Punjab: AIR 2018 SC 2011, the Apex Court has held as follows:"Be that as it may, the
Robin Mathew vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-01-2021
entry would depend on whose instruction/information such entry stood recorded and what was his source of information. [See Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana : (2010) 8 SCC 714 and Murugan Settu v. State of Tamil Nadu : AIR 2011
Smt. Salma Banu @ Salma vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2026
it would be useful to refer to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satpal Singh v State of Punjab1, wherein the relevant provisions are extracted as below:2. Section 37 of the NDPS Act reads as
State of Kerala Rep.by the Dysp Vatakara Through the Addl. Public Pros ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-20-2022
learned counsel for the defactocomplainant Advocate Nandini placed decision of the Apex Court in [(2010) 8 SCC 714], Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana. In para.10 to 18 of the judgment, the Apex Court considered the delay in lodging F.I.R
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free