Court : Jharkhand
..... ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 2395 of 2012 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 3788 of 2013 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... of coal. 3 subsequently, the demand notices directing the petitioner company to pay fine for violation of section 113 and section 114 of the motor vehicles act were raised. aggrieved, the petitioner has filed three writ petitions against three different demand notices issued to it. the details of the demand raised are as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 2395 of 2012 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 3788 of 2013 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... of coal. 3 subsequently, the demand notices directing the petitioner company to pay fine for violation of section 113 and section 114 of the motor vehicles act were raised. aggrieved, the petitioner has filed three writ petitions against three different demand notices issued to it. the details of the demand raised are as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 2395 of 2012 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 3788 of 2013 m/s. bharat coking coal limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having its registered office at koyla bhawan, po koyla nagar, ps saraidhela, district dhanbad through shri harendra kishore, hod (legal), bharat coking coal limited, koyla bhawan, ..... of coal. 3 subsequently, the demand notices directing the petitioner company to pay fine for violation of section 113 and section 114 of the motor vehicles act were raised. aggrieved, the petitioner has filed three writ petitions against three different demand notices issued to it. the details of the demand raised are as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... clearly made out against the petitioners and accordingly, there is no illegality in the impugned order.6. section 63 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 reads as follows:-"3. cognizance of offences.-notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)- (a) no court shall take ..... cognizance of an offence punishable under this act except upon a complaint, in writing, made by- (i) the controller; (ii) any other officer authorized in this behalf by the controller by general or special ..... is a member of such association or not explanation.- for the purposes of this clause recognised consumer association means a voluntary consumer association registered under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or under any other law for the time being in force: (b) no court inferior to that of a metropolitan magistrate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... and dragging the respondent no. 2 and abusing her in filthy language also is said to have taken place at delhi. suffice it to say that all overt acts, which are said to have constituted cruelty have allegedly taken place at delhi. the allegations as to what has happened at ambikapur are as follows: no purposeful information ..... kumar tiwary (petitioner no. 2 in cr.m.p. no. 4963 of 2001) had already filed an application for divorce under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 and the complaint case has been instituted as a counter blast. learned counsel further adds that the entire incident as alleged is said to have been taken place ..... had been instituted by the complainant against all her in-laws levelling various allegations against them. the complaint petition further reveals that the entire acts of alleged torture and demand of dowry and other acts enumerated in the complaint petition had taken place at ranchi. no allegation has been made by the complainant with respect to any part .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: provided that nothing contained in this sub- section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this act, if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. (2) ..... 08.05.2013 and 20.06.2013 has directed the jharkhand state pollution control board to take necessary action against the delinquent company under the environment (protection) act 1986. but in the instant case, company has not been made accused, nor there is any averment in the entire complaint petition to show that at the ..... magistrate, chaibasa in complaint case no. c/7-58 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the prosecution launched against the petitioner under section 15 of the environment (protection) act 1986.2. it appears that on the direction of ministry of environment and forest, government of india, dated 08.05.2013, the state government has directed the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... in terms of section 106 of the factories act, the order taking cognizance dated 22.08.2012 having not considered that the application itself was time barred, the petitioners cannot be prosecuted.10. in such ..... mind as neither the said order indicates that the delay has been condoned prior to taking cognizance nor the provisions of section 106 of the factories act have been appreciated prior to taking such cognizance. in such circumstances, when the prosecution report itself has been submitted beyond the prescribed period of limitation ..... was being carried out in the place of incident, the same as such does not come within the definition of a 'factory' and resultantly the factories act would not be applicable in such circumstances. mr. jerath, learned counsel for the petitioners, has submitted that the licence was granted for construction of civil buildings .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... eyes of law, also in view of the fact that no sanction was obtained in view of the bihar amendment in section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, vide bihar act no.4 of 1976, which prohibits taking cognizance under this section, except with the previous sanction of the state government or an officer specified in this behalf ..... 2007 passed by the learned chief judicial magistrate, lohardaga, is also quashed so far as it takes cognizance for the offence under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act against the petitioners. it is made clear that the order taking cognizance against the petitioners laldhar sahu, sudha devi and basand prasad sahu shall remain in force for ..... the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offence under section 498-a of the indian penal code, and sections 3 / 4 of the dowry prohibition act. petitioners have also prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding against them in the said case.3. the police case was instituted on the basis of the complaint .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... material to show the complicity of the petitioners. the anticipatory bail application of kamlesh kumar sharma does not help the cbi as it was he who had done the fraudulent act on the basis of general power of attorney executed by the partners. subsequent to what has been discussed above, i allow this application. accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed ..... punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477-a of the i.p.c. and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. the allegation made in the fir is that the officials of bokaro steel limited during the period 2008-09 entered into a criminal conspiracy with the partners of m .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... w4 has stated that in his opinion cause of death was due to asphyxia due to strangulation. finally, in such case of death section 113 b of the evidence act, comes into play and since there is death under unnatural circumstances within 7 years of marriage, accompanied by reports of harassment and demands of dowry which was informed to ..... then the case is proved against the accused.17. regarding the issue of being availed the benefit of being minor under the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, the claim of inclusion it seems is answered by the judgment cited by the counsel-for the appellant himself. the counsel has also relied on 2 other judgments. ..... age would be 16 years 2 months and 5 days, and hence he is entitled to benefit of minor even under the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000. regarding second appellant, counsel has said that she is also very old, now 83 years, and has already suffered the vigors of trial and imprisonment. he has .....
Tag this Judgment!