Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: jharkhand ranchi Page 1 of about 16 results (0.330 seconds)

Apr 25 2011 (HC)

Madan Lal . Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... p.s. case no.158 of 2007 on 6.8.2007 under section 414 and 34 of the indian penal code and also under section 33 of the indian forest act. on coming to know all about it, the said mahesh kumar came to hazaribagh along with his friends and met with the then officer-in-charge of padma outpost and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2011 (HC)

Manoranjan Prasad SinhA. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 would tantamount to miscarriage of justice. i further find that the informant was a party to the proceeding initiated under section 107 of the code of criminal procedure ..... i find and observe that the ingredients to constitute an offence under section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 is not attracted against the petitioner as the alleged occurrence did not take place within "public view" , as such the criminal proceeding of the petitioner under ..... at the outset submitted that charge-sheet was submitted only under section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act and not under section 385 of the indian penal code and in that manner, extortion of money, which is the genesis of the case, has been disbelieved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2011 (HC)

Swarn Singh. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... submitted charge-sheet obtaining sanction under section 197 of the code of criminal procedure from the competent authority as also under section 19(1) (a) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and accordingly, cognizance of the offence was taken under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(e) of the prevention of corruption ..... act. prayer of the petitioner was rejected by the learned special judge, cbi, dhanbad on 28.9.2010 observing that the items were seized during investigation and there were assets of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2011 (HC)

Sanjeev Kumar Jha And Ors. Vs. Swami Ram Krishna Paramhans Teacher's ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... the provision of the universities act and also against the decisions referred to above on behalf of the petitioners, as those decisions of the hon'ble supreme court relate to the period prior to enactment ..... directing the university to allow the students to take examination. the said order keeping in view the provision of section 14(6) of the n.c.t.e act and the decision rendered in case of state of maharashtra vs. sant dnyaneshwar shikshan shastra mahavidyalaya and others(supra) it can never be said to be contrary to ..... the college took admission of the students for the session 2009-10 without having any affiliation from the university in terms of section 4(19) of the jharkhand state universities act, 2000 and in that event, the students of the college had had no right to appear in the examination conducted by the university. 3. however, this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2011 (HC)

S. Burman @ Satidas Burman. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

1. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of his criminal prosecution in Complaint Case No.108/1998, including the order dated 21st September, 2001 by which processes were directed to be issued against him by Ms. Premlata Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro for the alleged offence under Sections 406/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The case is presently pending in the court of Sri A. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro.2. Prosecution story in short was that the complainant-opposite party No.2 Shri Basudeo Mishra had filed Complaint Case No.108/1998 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro against as many as nine accused persons alleging, inter alia, that in January, 1997, TELCO in association with M/s. Enar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. (the Dealer) organized a seminar at Bokaro Steel City where the accused persons highlighted the features of a newly made chassis branded a...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2011 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office and anr. Vs. Dr. Thakur Sur ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... appeal is that the tribunal has wrongly awarded an exorbitant amount towards loss of future earning capacity. the amount should have been awarded in accordance with the schedule of the act and, therefore, on the basis of principles laid down in various decisions amount of rs. 14,63,207/- is excessive and very high.7. the contention raised by the learned ..... and the same is accordingly dismissed. the insurance company is liable to disburse the amount forthwith after deduction of the amount already deposited under section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 or any other deposits made pursuant to any other order.14. accordingly, for the reasons stated herein above, the present appeal stands dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2011 (HC)

Kailash Mandal and anr. Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... -law and father-in-law is general and no specific overt act has been attributed except by saying that the father was also siding with his son sanjay mandal in demanding rs.50,000/-the other witnesses perhaps have not supported the ..... against these petitioners.6. from perusal of the fir i find that the allegation was made against the son-in-law and his father kailash mandal and no specific overt act was attributed at all against the mother-in-law of the deceased. in the evidence of the informant and her son i find that the allegation against the mother-in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2011 (HC)

Ranchi Municipal Corporation. Vs. Bhagwati Devi and ors

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... are under challenge. by the orders, which are under challenge, the permanent lok adalat has ordered that the tax imposed by the municipal corporation, ranchi under patna municipal corporation act is not liable to be sustained, because there is no regular supply of water and other amenities in the localities and therefore, such tax cannot be imposed.3. the ..... will cover and give jurisdiction about the interference, as made by the permanent lok adalat in relation to the imposition of tax. the imposition of tax is a sovereign act. the validity of imposition of tax is not under challenge as it is no more res-integra, since the same has already been upheld by a division bench of ..... of the statutory provisions, we do not see that the legal provisions make it possible for the permanent lok adalat to look into the enforceability of an act, which is an act enforcing a levy of tax and what it could do, is only contained in section 22 where the dispute in between the parties could be brought before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2011 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd and ors. Dr. Thakur Surendra Kumar Singh an ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... appeal is that the tribunal has wrongly awarded an exorbitant amount towards loss of future earning capacity. the amount should have been awarded in accordance with the schedule of the act and, therefore, on the basis of principles laid down in various decisions amount of rs. 14,63,207/- is excessive and very high.7. the contention raised by the learned ..... and the same is accordingly dismissed. the insurance company is liable to disburse the amount forthwith after deduction of the amount already deposited under section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 or any other deposits made pursuant to any other order.14. accordingly, for the reasons stated herein above, the present appeal stands dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2011 (HC)

KamaruddIn Ansari. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

1. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the quashment of the F.I.R. and the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 159 of 2009 registered on 01.09.2009, corresponding to G.R.No.1842 of 2009 being the second F.I.R. for the same cause of action though earlier First Information Report was lodged at the same Police Station vide Jamua P.S. Case No.111 of 2009 on 23.06.2009, corresponding to G.R.No.1313 of 2009 pending in the Court of the C.J.M., Giridih for the alleged offence under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Jamua P.S. Case No.111 of 2009 was lodged on 23.06.2009 for the alleged offence under Sections 279/337/338/304(a) of I.P.C. wherein the motorcycle rider Ram Chandra Mandal succumbed to his injuries in the accident caused by a "Maruti Van" bearing No.B.I.R. 6363 which was driven rashly and negligently and the case was instituted against unknown driver of the ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //