Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: jharkhand Page 100 of about 2,242 results (0.089 seconds)

Darastul Khalif Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR612(Jhr)]

ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The appellant has preferred the statutory appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the order dated 11th March, 2008 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner (Fast Track Court No. VII), Ranchi in Title Appeal No. 97 of 2005 by reasons of which the petitions, filed by the appellant on 11th January, 2007 and 25th May, 2007 for issuance of a direction to defendant Nos. 2 to 6 to appeal before the court for taking their specimen signatures as also the petition filed on 20th November, 2007 for initiating a Miscellaneous Case have been rejected.2. This Hon'ble Court vide order dated 17th July, 20078 had asked for a report from the office with respect to maintainability of criminal appeal against the impugned order dated 11th March, 2008 passed in Title Appeal No. 97 of 2005. Pursuant thereto, the office vide its report dated 28th July, 2008 and 31st July, 2008 has opined that if a petition under Section 340 of the Code o...

Madhu Sudan Prasad Singh Vs. Tata Steel Limited

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR294(Jhr)]

..... back wages is stayed by the high court on the application filed by the employer under section 17-b of the industrial disputes act, then from which date direction could be issued for payment of last wages drawn by the workman.6. aforesaid question has been ..... filing writ petition being wp (l) no. 4637 of 2006. in that writ petition, application under section 17-b of the act was filed by the employer for stay of the award. learned single judge in terms of order dated 27.4.2007 directed the ..... the order dated 27.4.2007 directing the petitioner to pay wages under section 17-b of the industrial disputes act, from the date of the award. he further submitted that the current wages are also not paid. he relied on interim order ..... 4637 of 2006 wherein learned single judge refused to modify the order dated 27.4.2007 under section 17-b of the industrial disputes act.2. the impugned order reads as under:mr. p.p.n. rai submitted that this application has been filed for modification of .....

Chandra Prakash Singh Vs. the Jharkhand State Electricity Board and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR300(Jhr)]

..... also that the licensee or supplier, as the case may be, on deposit or payment of the assessed amount or electricity charges in accordance with the provisions of this act, shall, without prejudice to the obligation to lodge the complaint as referred to in the second proviso to this clause, restore the supply line of electricity within forty ..... comply with the formalities and, therefore, the sanctioned load of the petitioner remained as it is, but petitioner was not drawing extra load.4. section 126 of the act, inter alia, provides that if on an inspection of any place or premises, or after inspection of records, the assessing officer comes to the conclusion that there has ..... but even after the expiry of a long time, no order of provisional assessment has been served on the petitioner in terms of section 126 of the electricity act, 2003 (for short 'the act'). he relied on air 2006 cal 65 kawsar ali etc.2. mr. j. dubey, appearing for the jharkhand state electricity board (for short 'the board .....

Boc India Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR337(Jhr)]

..... ltd and ors. : [2000]1scr505 , the supreme court observed:7. the law relating to award of a contract by the state, its corporations and bodies acting as instrumentalities and agencies of the government has been settled by the decision of this court in ramana dayaram shetty v. international airport authority of india, fertilizer corporation ..... punishment in another. punishment has a corelation with facts and in each case where punishment is imposed, the same must be the resultant effect of the acts complained of--more serious the violation, more severe is the punishment--and that has been the accepted norm, in matters though however within the prescribed limits. ..... 5, should have indulged in tutoring sushil kumar and forced him to give false evidence while proceedings were pending in this court. they have aggravated their contumacious acts. their action was deliberate and an attempt to overreach the due process of law without compunction. their action is an affront to the majesty of law. .....

Md. Rahman Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1914; [2009(1)JCR198(Jhr)]

..... lodged for the alleged offence under sections 420/413 and 414 of the indian penal code, sections 33/41 and 42 of ihe indian forest act as also under section 20 of the forest produce regulation act, which could be evident from the fir.3. mr. jitendra s. singh, learned counsel submitted on behalf of the petitioner that confiscation proceeding bearing confiscation .....

Shashank Shekhar Singh and anr. Vs. Phulpoti Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR221(Jhr)]

..... fact that in accordance with the correct interpretation of the order dated 29.2.2008, the order of stay was automatically vacated, in absence of extension for further period, any act or deed in terms of what has been sought to be explained by the appellant, if committed by the respondent, would not amount to contempt of court.12. in the .....

Siya Ram Agarwal and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR601(Jhr)]

ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioners in this writ application have prayed for quashing the order dated 8.10.2007 passed by the Munsif, Chaibasa in Title Suit No. 13 of 2005 whereby the petitioners prayer made on 27.8.2007 for appointing a Pleader Commissioner, under Order XXVI. Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to carry out a local inspection for ascertaining as to whether in the process of carving out new plot Nos. 138 (a) to 138 (c) from the old plot No. 1290, an area of two decimals has been reduced and the same has wrongly been recorded in favour of the Chaibasa Municipality.2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent State.3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and also learned Counsel for the respondents.4. The petitioners had filed a suit before the Court below for a declaration for his right, title and interest over the suit property described in Schedule 'A' to the plaint, which bears the present survey over plot No. 135 under Khata No. 129 ha...

Kamod Prasad Sinha Vs. Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... .p.a. no. 829 of 2007 by the patna high court has recently beer followed by this court in w.p.(s) no. 3435 of 2006 in the case of bal bhadra singh v. bihar state food & civil supplies corporation ltd. and ors.5. as it appears from the relevant facts of the case, in terms of rule 73 of the .....

Sanjay Kumar Singh and Ajay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... as haidar nagar p.s. case no. 6 of 1986 under section 307 and other allied sections of the indian penal code and also under section 27 of the arms act against some named accused persons as well as some unknown. while the matter was pending investigation, the petitioners were granted bail by this court. subsequently, charge sheet was submitted on .....

Shiv Shankar Dey Vs. Damodar Ram

Court : Jharkhand

..... substantive rights and substantial justice. 'the humanist rule that procedure' should be the handmaid, not the mistress, of legal justice compels consideration of vesting a residuary power in judges to act ex debito justitiae where the tragic sequel otherwise would be wholly inequitable...justice is the goal of jurisprudence-processual, as mush as substantive.46(iv) the purpose of providing the .....