Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: jharkhand Page 2 of about 2,242 results (1.631 seconds)

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Madhubala Sinha and Anr Vs. M S Central Coalfields Ltd Thro Its Chairm ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... that her son would take care of his mother (petitioner no. 1), inborn blind sister, puja kumari and also his unmarried sister at that time namely, seema kumari. thereafter, seema kumari solemnized her marriage in the year 2014 with one mukesh kumar. at the time of grant of appointment letter, the son of petitioner no. 1 ..... been included in the list of the dependents.9. learned counsel for the petitioners mr. mahesh tewari argued that under section 2 of the workman s compensation act, definition of dependent is very clear. mother comes under category a dependent. learned counsel for the petitioners argued that as per the definition of dependent under the ..... p.o. & p.s. bank more, distt. dhanbad (jharkhand). petitioners versus1 m/s. central coalfields ltd. through its chairman-cum-managing director, a registered company under the companies act, having its head office at darbhanga house, p.s. g.p.o., p.s. kotwali, distt. ranchi.2. the chairman-cum-managing director, m/s. central coalfields ltd .....

State of Jharkhand Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR246(Jhr)]

..... . learned counsel submitted that the instant cases arise out of mining leases, governed by the stipulated terms and conditions as well as by the provisions of the mmdr act and mc rules 1960. several issues of law have been raised in the writ petitions, which can be adjudicated upon and decided by this court and not by ..... filed by the state of jharkhand assailing the order dated 9th november, 2005 passed by the mir ing tribunal while exercising the power under section 30 of the mmdr act read with rule 54 of the mc rules 1960.(ii) the mining tribunal while passing the aforesaid order did not approve the order dated 15th december, 2004 whereby ..... detrimental to the public interest as it also entails avoidable wastage of public money and time. various departments of the government are it limbs and, therefore, they must act in coordination and not in confrontation. filing of a writ petition by one department against the other by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the high court is not only .....

Tulsi Charan Sahu Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... on 22.03.2001 for the offence under sections 3/4/5 of explosive substance act and under section 17 of c.l.a. act on the allegation that the officer-in-charge received the confidential information that in the house of one bal govind sahu near satrangi bazar, huge quantity of explosives have been kept and the said ..... bal govind sahu used to sell those explosives to the extremists and after that the informant ..... it is necessary to take notice of the definition of special category explosive substance and explosive substance is defined in sections 2(a) and (b) of the explosive substances act, 1908, which reads as follows:- section 2(a)- the expression explosive substance shall be deemed to include any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, .....

Raj Kishore Sahu Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... on 22.03.2001 for the offence under sections 3/4/5 of explosive substance act and under section 17 of c.l.a. act on the allegation that the officer-in-charge received the confidential information that in the house of one bal govind sahu near satrangi bazar, huge quantity of explosives have been kept and the said ..... bal govind sahu used to sell those explosives to the extremists and after that the informant ..... it is necessary to take notice of the definition of special category explosive substance and explosive substance is defined in sections 2(a) and (b) of the explosive substances act, 1908, which reads as follows:- section 2(a)- the expression explosive substance shall be deemed to include any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, .....

Sadanand Prasad Singh Alias Madan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... on 22.03.2001 for the offence under sections 3/4/5 of explosive substance act and under section 17 of c.l.a. act on the allegation that the officer-in-charge received the confidential information that in the house of one bal govind sahu near satrangi bazar, huge quantity of explosives have been kept and the said ..... bal govind sahu used to sell those explosives to the extremists and after that the informant ..... it is necessary to take notice of the definition of special category explosive substance and explosive substance is defined in sections 2(a) and (b) of the explosive substances act, 1908, which reads as follows:- section 2(a)- the expression explosive substance shall be deemed to include any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, .....

Hari Bansh Lal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... and trading functions.13. on perusal of annexure-6 of the writ application, it is clear that said notification was issued in view of the electricity act, 2003 section 172(a) considering jseb as state transmission and utility and licensee.14. learned counsel has vehemently raised that the government has indirectly deprived the ..... state government may notify, and shall perform the duties and functions of the state transmission utility and a licensee in accordance with the provisions of this act and rules and regulations made thereunder: provided that the state government may, by notification, authorise the state electricity board to continue to function as the ..... state government may invite and shall perform the duties and function of the state transmission utility and a licensee in accordance with the provision of this act and rules and regulation made thereunder. provided that the state government may by notification 7. authorize the state electricity board to continue to function as .....

Ram Singh Kunkal Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... andhra pradesh, reported in (1993) 2 scc684 the law in this regard is well settled by the hon'ble supreme court as follows:-"8. section 32(1) of the evidence act is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible evidence and unless evi- dence is tested by cross-examination, it is not creditworthy. under section 32 .....

K N Bakshi College of Education Thr Its Acting Pr Chief Administrative ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... found to be defaulting in this behalf is bound to render himself or herself liable for initiation of proceedings under the provisions of the contempt of courts act, 1971 as well as for a disciplinary action in accordance with the orders of the court. .............. 6. further, the petitioner after having accepted the ..... fair and transparent manner as well as to maintain the standards of education. the purpose of providing a time schedule is to ensure that all authorities concerned act within the stipulated time............... 82. ................... none in the hierarchy of the state government, university, ncte or any other authority or body involved in this process ..... of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 5437 of 2014 k.n. bakshi college of education, karmatand, p.o. & p.s. bengabad, district giridih through its acting principal/chief administrative officer ajit kumar singh, son of shri rejeshwar paul, residing at merawal, sindur, p.s. sadar, p.o. & district hazaribagh ... petitioner versus 1 .....