Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Sanction - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 2010

M.L.George, Ex. Sgt., Monnaparayil House, Kottayam, Kerala Vs. Pension ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on: Jun-11-2010

THOMAS MATHEW, MEMBER (A). The petitioner is an Ex-service man who retired from Air Force after serving for almost 18 years. He was invalided from service having been found medically unfit for further service in the...


Jan 09 2024

Anilkumar Ayyappan vs the Authorized Officer/Chief Manager[ Sanctions]

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-09-2024

YEARS, S/O AYYAPPAN AMBILIKARAZHMA OLAKETTIAMBALAM PO MAVELIKKARA, PIN - 690510. BY ADV M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER[ SANCTIONS] STATE BANK OF INDIA, RASMEC MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 690101. BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION


Mar 24 2010

The Accounts Officer (Pension Sanction) Vs. Mariyamma

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-24-2010

Reported in: 2010(2)KLT241

If there are no surviving members of the family as in items (a) to (e) above, Government may sanction family pension to the members, referred to in items (f) and (g) subject to the conditions prescribed in


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2013

Pal Singh. Finally the Ac Ist Grade Assandh Sanctioned the Vs. Ved Par ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-25-2013

2013 in/and LPA No.791 of 2013 (O & M) -4- Pal Singh. Finally, the AC Ist Grade, Assandh sanctioned the Naksha 'Zeem' on 3.1.1997 and issued the 'Sanad Taksim' on 13.2.1997 i.e.after the prescribed period for filing


Jan 21 2013

“for Obtaining a Sanction for the Prosecution of a Public Servant Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-21-2013

in this context.8. Ex facie the argument of learned counsel that since the prosecution did not obtain the sanction to prosecute, so, the Court cannot take cognizance of the criminal case against the petitioners-accused, is not only


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial