Same Suit - Judgment Search Results
Hotel Neelambari Suites vs Rathan Kelkar I.a.S
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-28-2023
1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1851 OF 2022JUDGMENT DATED 03.08.2022 IN WP(C) 24892/2022 OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER: M/S.HOTEL NEELAMBARI SUITES VILLANCHIRA, NERIAMANGALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.G.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.P.E.GANGADHARAN (LATE) BY ADV
Hotel Neelambari Suites vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-03-2022
THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 24892 OF 2022 PETITIONER: M/s.HOTEL NEELAMBARI SUITES VILLANCHIRA, NERIAMANGALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.G. SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. P.E. GANGADHARAN
Hotel Neelambari Suites vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-12-2022
THANGALAM JUNCTION, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686691 BY SRI.SREEJITH V.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADERRESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): M/S HOTEL NEELAMBARI SUITES VILLANCHIRA, NERIAMANGALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER P.G. SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O P.E. GANGADHARAN
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Suit ShanthammA. Wife of M.R.Muriswaiey, Aged About 55 Yeas. Sri Natar ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-04-2010
win and based on which, they tried to claim the property.3.Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, the suit was filed for partition and thereafter, another suit was filed for declaration, and in the said suits, issue
Suit. Puttarangamma Vs. Bangalore Transport Service
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-29-2010
Matched in: Parties Suit. Puttarangamma Vs. Bangalore Transport Service
Suit. Mangamma W/O Sri Yellappa Vs. Sri Bharath Lal Meena
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2010
Contempt of Court Act praying to initiate contempt of come Proceedings against the accused herein and to take. Suitable action for his willful disobedience of the final order dated 10.12.2009 passed in W.P.No. 187-13/2009 (BDA) vide Annexure-A.
Suit Pankaja Thaman, Vs. Sri T Ramesh
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-26-2010
Matched in: Parties Suit Pankaja Thaman, Vs. Sri T Ramesh
Suit Kempa Channam Ma Wife of Late Sri K.Siddaiah and ors. Vs. Sri Ann ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-31-2011
the respondent No. 2 is defendant No. I and respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff in both the suits. The defendants are common in both the suits and plaintiffs are different. For convenience, the parties are referred
“10. a Suit Challenging the Validity of Departmental Proceedings Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
passed by the learned trial Court on 02.11.1996 and affirmed by the learned fiRs.Appellate Court on 08.09.1998 whereby suit for declaration to the effect that the adveRs.remarks recorded in the Annual Confidential Report for the period 01.04.1992
Whether the Suit Is Not Maintainable?opd Vs. Shinder Singh Alias Jaswi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
the appellant. None for respondent No.1. Mr.Lokesh Chander Aggarwal, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.2. Mahavir S.Chauhan, J. Civil Suit No.150 of 1983, R.T.No.200 of 29.03.1985 was brought before Sub Judge, 1st Class, Moga (hereinafter referred to as
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free