Same Business - Judgment Search Results

Business Guides Vs. Chromatic Commun.

Court: US Supreme Court

nonsigning party may be sanctioned. The District Court found that Business Guides failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry before signing the

Better Business Bureau Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

are investigated, exposed, and destroyed. Such efforts to cleanse the business system of dishonest practices are highly commendable, and may even

Sharp Business System Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax-iii

Court: Delhi

Publicities by which the latter agreed to part with its business of film exhibition shots and not to compete with the

Calcutta Business Centre Vs. The official Liquidator, High Court,

Court: Kolkata

granted in respect thereof, there is no question of the business being discontinued from the office at the said premises, particularly

Small Business Administration Vs. Mcclellan

Court: US Supreme Court

inconsistent with the basic purposes and provisions of the Small Business Act. The contention rests upon the fact that having a

Business Information Processing Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (2000)73ITD304(JP.)

some areas of the enterprise was supplemental to the existing business and there was no material to hold that it amounted

Alankar Business Corporation Vs. the Dcit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (2007)105ITD629(Chennai)

activity and therefore it should be considered as expansion of business only. He further pointed out that the machineries were taken

Commissioner of Business Profits Tax, Bombay City I Vs. Tata Iron and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1970]78ITR450(Bom)

appeal the Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the decision of the Business profits tax Officer and held these were amounts received by

Rose Business Forms Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT320TriDel

the aid of the printing machineries, printed computer stationery (Manifold business forms) and rulled papers which are both of them articles

Ford Business Services Center (P) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in: (2008)114TTJ(Chennai)881

the ground that the assessee has not yet commenced its business. The CIT(A) agreed with the AO that the claim of