Salt - Judgment Search Results

Salt Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal560,2Ind.Cas.591

Matched in: Parties Salt Vs. Emperor

Salt Commissioner, Jaipur Vs. Savitri Salt Suppliers and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1999)9SCC226

ORDER  1. Leave granted.  2. M/s Savitri Salt Suppliers filed Writ Petition No. 573 of 1994 in the High Court of Gauhati seeking certain directions against

Egyptian Salt and Soda Co., Limited Vs. Port Said Salt Association, Li ...

Court: Privy Council

company, having regard to the terms of its Memorandum of Association, to engage in the business of exporting salt from Egypt. The respondent company is a shareholder of the appellant company and as such asks and has

Management, the Assistant Salt Commissioner Vs. Secretary, Central Sal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(224)ELT14(SC); JT2008(2)SC469; (2008)ILLJ1016SC; 2008(2)SCALE548; (2008)11SCC278; 2009[16]STR97; 2008AIRSCW1443; 2008LABIC1368; 2008(2)Supreme276.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Assistant Salt Commissioner, the appellant herein, is responsible for monitoring production and supply of salt within his jurisdiction. Salt Commission

The Union of India (Uoi), Through Deputy Salt Commissioner and anr. Vs ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(4)BomCR679; (1996)98BOMLR118

in 1952 by the respondents, the respondents were given the user of the land only i.e. manufacturing of salt and it could be termed either as a lease or a licence. But, in any case the same

Management of Badjampura Salt Factory, Naupada Represented by the Mana ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP378; (1959)ILLJ544AP

This is an application under Article 220 of the Constitution on behalf of the management of the Badjanapuram Salt Factory seeking to impugn the award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 16-10-11956.2. The petitioner company is a salt

Bidhannagar (Salt Lake) Welfare Association Vs. Central Valuation Boar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC2276; (SCSuppl)2007(3)CHN95; 2007(7)SCALE546; (2007)6SCC668; 2007AIRSCW3962

not and/ or could not carry out any house to house survey of all the 17070 holdings in Salt Lake.16. In their counter-affidavits, the respondents inter alia stated:18. The allegations made in paragraph 23 of the said

Reliance Salt Ltd. Vs. Cosmos Enterprises and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(2007)BC480(SC); [2006]134CompCas645(SC); JT2006(10)SC529; 2006(12)SCALE286

Agent by an agreement dated 23.12.1993 in regard to the sale of products of the Appellant Company-plaintiff, namely, Salt and Tea in South and Central Bihar. In terms of the said agreement it was required to furnish

Deputy Salt Commissioner, Madras Vs. Muthukumaraswamy Mudaliar and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1990(1)SC130; 1990(1)SCALE92; 1990Supp(1)SCC14; 1990(2)LC336(SC)

respondents were entitled to get a ryotwari patta under Section 8(1) of the said Act. The appellant, Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed an appeal on behalf of the Government of India against this order under Section 11(3) of

Jay Laxmi Salt Works (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994ACJ902; (1995)1GLR818; JT1994(3)SC492; (1995)109PLR1; 1994(2)SCALE797; (1994)4SCC1; [1994]3SCR866; MANU/SC/0692/1994

now is part of State of Gujarat, made a plan for reclamation of vast area of land from saltiest water of sea by erecting a 'reclamation bundh' so as to prevent the sea water flowing in several