Said Period - Judgment Search Results

United India Periodicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissione ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Del)84

learned Departmental Representative, made available to us the record showing the date of filing the original return. The said date is 26th July, 1961. Thus, the penalty, if any leviable, is required to be computed as per … being disposed of through this consolidated order.2. The facts in brief are that the assessed-company in the relevant period was engaged in the business of printing and publishing an english weekly 'Link'. It also undertook such printing

United India Periodicals P. Limited Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limi ...

Court: Delhi

('MTNL') and UIPL does not subsist insofar as UIPL is concerned on account of events subsequent to the said Agreement and for a declaration that an order dated 21st September 1994 issued by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director ('CMD') … 1. O.M.P. No. 135 of 1994 has been filed by United India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd. ('UIPL') under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 ('Act') praying for declaration that arbitration clause

Periods 31.10.2013. Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

It is submitted that since the Transferor Company will be dissolved, petitioner may be asked to deposit the said amount in Bank.”. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Advocate filed today the additional affidavit of Mr. Alok Sampatrai, Regional Director, … the Scheme, whereas the Companies have prepared and filed their balance sheet and profit loss account for the period ended Mittal Manju 2014.06.03 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Company Petition

Period of More Than 240 Days. as Noticed Hereinbefore the Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

25-F and wages, proof of receipt of salary, examination of co-worker were relevant factors to determine whether the said period had been completed. Resultantly, the appeal of the management was allowed since the Labour Court had been prejudiced

United India Periodicals Pvt Ltd vs.cmyk Printech Ltd

Court: Delhi

XXIII does not require just a seal of approval from the Court to an alleged agreement or compromise said to have been entered into between the parties. The statute requires the Court to be first satisfied that … * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1074/2016 & I.A. 8916/2017 UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate with Mr.Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Advocate. versus CMYK PRINTECH LTD

United India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993(26)DRJ324

being in force. The Uip was to execute all the work on its own cost and it specifically said that it bad made the offer under the original agreement after taking into consideration all the cost factors … MTNL), invited tenders for publication of directories in the metropolis of Delhi and Bombay. Tender of United India Periodicals Pvt Ltd, in short Uip, being-tie highest was accepted and an agreement dated 14.3.87 ( original agreement) duly

United India Periodicals Vs. Central Bank of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)1113; 70(1997)DLT786; 1997(43)DRJ782

plaintiff. It was prayed that either the suit be rejected or the plaintiff be ordered to file the said documents and supply copies thereof to the defendants and the time for filing written statement be enlarged.(3) In

Newspapers and Periodicals Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1981(2)KarLJ577; (1982)ILLJ189Kant

S. 17 of the Working Jouralists (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955 (the Act), a dispute said to exist between the petitioners and the 4th respondent, to the Labour Court, Bangalore, for adjudication. 2. The … the petitioners which according to him, they were liable to pay towards his wages and bonus for the period from 9-7-1971 to 31-12-1979. 3. In these petitions, filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the

United India Periodicals (P.) Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)49ITD686(Delhi)

learned Departmental Representative, made available to us the record showing the date of filing the original return. The said date is 26th July, 1961. Thus, the penalty, if any leviable, is required to be computed as per … being disposed of through this consolidated order.2. The facts in brief are that the assessee-company in the relevant period was engaged in the business of printing and publishing an English weekly "Link". It also undertook such printing

Cmyk Printech Ltd. Vs.united India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

31.03.2014 a registered lease deed was executed amongst the parties. On the expiry of the term of the said lease, the parties agreed to extend the lease and signed an unregistered lease deed dated 18.04.2015. Sometime in … Mr. Ratnakar Dass, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advs. versus UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT. LTD. Shyel Through Ms. ..... Respondent Trehan Ms.Sugandha Batra, Advs. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA