Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Sag - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 1998

Sag Construction Associates Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-28-1998

Reported in: 1999IAD(Delhi)867; (1999)155CTR(Del)120; [1998]234ITR501(Delhi); 1999RLR248

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. This is a petition by an assessed seeking direction to respondent No. 5 to release payment of interest to the petitioner under Section 244(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The facts relevant...


Nov 01 2011

Central Government Sag (S-29) Pensionersand#8217; Association Through ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-01-2011

may be required to be mentioned are, however, extracted from OA No.655/2010 in the matter of Central Government SAG (S-29) Pensioners’ Association and another v. Union of India and Others. 2. Applicants, who are pre-2006 retirees, are


Apr 29 2013

Union of India and anr. Vs. Central Govt. Sag and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

& ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus CENTRAL GOVT. SAG & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.K.Ghosh and Mr.Tarun Gupta, Advocates W.P.(C) 2348/2012 UNION


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2005

National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (Ntpc) Vs. Siemens Atiengesell ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2005

Reported in: 2005(2)ARBLR172(Delhi); 121(2005)DLT36; 2005(83)DRJ46

2002 which has been titled as 'Partial Award'. In the ultimate analysis, the Arbitral Tribunal ruled that the SAG's claim was maintainable and was not barred by limitation while the counter claims of the NTPC were not


May 01 2013

Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal Advocate Vs. Raj Rani Widow of Late Hari De ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-01-2013

Neelam widow of Anil Kumar, and others ...Petitioners versus Raj Rani widow of late Hari Devi son of Sagli Ram, and others....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr.Puneet Jindal, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. ---- 1.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial