Sacking - Judgment Search Results

Mattox Vs. Sacks

Court: US Supreme Court

Mattox v. Sacks - 369 U.S. 656 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Mattox v. Sacks, 369 U.S. 656 (1962) Mattox v. Sacks

United States Vs. Sacks

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Sacks - 257 U.S. 37 (1921) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Sacks, 257 U.S. 37 (1921) United States

Arp Woven Sack Pvt Ltd Through Its Authorized Representative vs Union ...

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16553/2025 ARP WOVEN SACK PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr Vinay Yadav

Century Paper Sacks Pvt Ltd vs the Commissioner (Appeal -II)

Court: Chennai

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.No.14757 of 2025 M/s. Century Paper Sacks Pvt Ltd., Represented by its Director Mr.A.M.Prakash Plot No.76 & 77, EPIP, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Gummidipoondi, Gummidipundi, Chennai

Neo Sacks Limited Vs. Cegat

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(61)ECC238; 1999(114)ELT826(MP)

ORDERB.A. Khan, J.1. Even landmark judgments sometimes generate avoidable debate. The celebrated judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [AIR 1997 SC1125], which rendered the decisions/judgments of Tribunals set up under Articles 323A and...

Neo Sack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (Appeals) C. Ex.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(119)ELT522(MP)

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Both these petitions are being decided by a common order because these petitions are being decided strictly on question of law.2. Shri I.C. Upadhyay, counsel for petitioner. Shri B.G. Neema, standing counsel for...

Neo Sack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex., Indore

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(80)ECC67; 2002(139)ELT506(MP)

A.M. Sapre, J.1. By filing this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of what they describe in the relief clause to be a demand letter, dated...

Neo Sack Ltd. (Export Division) Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(76)ECC145; 2001(132)ELT555(MP)

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. What is challenged in this writ filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is, an order dated 27-11-2000 (Annexure P5-A), passed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs...

Poly Fill Sacks Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2005(101)ECC653; 2005(183)ELT344(Guj)

D.A. Mehta, J.1. RULE. Mr. Jitendra Malkan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. By consent of the respective parties, for the reasons that follow hereinafter,...

Quality Woven Sacks Private Limited Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commissio ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

W.P.No.16735 / 2011 (Smt. Nisha Shukla ..v ..State of M.P.& otheRs.04-07-2012 Shri Kaustubh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission. It is stated by the...