* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16553/2025 ARP WOVEN SACK PVT LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr Vinay Yadav

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 28 1998

Neo Sacks Limited Vs. Cegat

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-28-1998

Reported in: 1998(61)ECC238; 1999(114)ELT826(MP)

ORDERB.A. Khan, J.1. Even landmark judgments sometimes generate avoidable debate. The celebrated judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India [AIR 1997 SC1125], which rendered the decisions/judgments of Tribunals set up under Articles 323A and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2000

Neo Sack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (Appeals) C. Ex.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-2000

Reported in: 2000(119)ELT522(MP)

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Both these petitions are being decided by a common order because these petitions are being decided strictly on question of law.2. Shri I.C. Upadhyay, counsel for petitioner. Shri B.G. Neema, standing counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2001

Neo Sack Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex., Indore

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-29-2001

Reported in: 2002(80)ECC67; 2002(139)ELT506(MP)

A.M. Sapre, J.1. By filing this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of what they describe in the relief clause to be a demand letter, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Neo Sack Ltd. (Export Division) Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

Reported in: 2001(76)ECC145; 2001(132)ELT555(MP)

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. What is challenged in this writ filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is, an order dated 27-11-2000 (Annexure P5-A), passed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2005

Poly Fill Sacks Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Feb-18-2005

Reported in: 2005(101)ECC653; 2005(183)ELT344(Guj)

D.A. Mehta, J.1. RULE. Mr. Jitendra Malkan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. By consent of the respective parties, for the reasons that follow hereinafter,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2012

Quality Woven Sacks Private Limited Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commissio ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-04-2012

W.P.No.16735 / 2011 (Smt. Nisha Shukla ..v ..State of M.P.& otheRs.04-07-2012 Shri Kaustubh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission. It is stated by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1997

Lingaraj Poly Sacks Vs. Additional Entry Tax Officer and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-25-1997

Reported in: AIR1998Kant306; [1998]109STC516(Kar)

Consumption, Use or Sale Therein Act, 1979 causes entry of what are known as high density polythene woven sacks in the local area of Arasikere in the Hassan District. These sacks, it appears, are used by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
Next ›
Last »

Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

Sacking - Judgment Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.