Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Sac - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 1911

Sac and Fox Indians Vs. Sac and Fox Indians

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-24-1911

Sac and Fox Indians v. Sac and Fox Indians - 220 U.S. 481 (1911) U.S. Supreme Court Sac and


Mar 21 2002

Sacs Eagles Chicory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-21-2002

Reported in: [2002]255ITR178(SC); (2002)10SCC337

S.B. Bharucha, C.J.; N. Santosh Hegde; Arijit Pasayat, JJ.1. The question to be considered reads thus:“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee firm is an industrial undertaking eligible for deduction...


Apr 24 1930

Abdul Sac Alias Varusai Mohammad Sahib Vs. Sundara Mudaliar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-24-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Mad817; (1930)59MLJ932

Matched in: Parties Abdul Sac Alias Varusai Mohammad Sahib Vs. Sundara Mudaliar and anr.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

1870

Smith Vs. Sac County

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1870

Smith v. Sac County - 78 U.S. 139 (1870) U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Sac County, 78 U.S. 11 Wall. 139


Oct 28 1998

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sacs Eagles Chicory

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-28-1998

Reported in: [2000]241ITR319(Mad)

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.1. The question referred to us at the instance of the Revenue is as to 'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee-firm is an industrial undertaking eligible...


Oct 28 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sacs Eagles Chicory

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-28-1998

Reported in: [2000]107TAXMAN463(Mad)

ORDERJayasimha Babu, J.The question referred to us at the instance of the revenue is as to' whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee-firm is an industrial undertaking eligible for deduction...


May 17 1993

Oklahoma Tax Comm'n Vs. Sac and Fox Nation

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-1993

Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac and Fox Nation - 508 U.S. 114 (1993) OCTOBER TERM, 1992 Syllabus OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION v. SAC AND


1876

Cromwell Vs. County of Sac

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1876

Cromwell v. County of Sac - 94 U.S. 351 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351 (1876) Cromwell


1877

Cromwell Vs. County of Sac

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1877

Cromwell v. County of Sac - 96 U.S. 51 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Cromwell v. County of Sac, 96 U.S. 51 (1877) Cromwell


May 16 2011

Sergeant (Acting Unpaid J.W.O) B.M. sharma (service No.700097 'R') CLK ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on: May-16-2011

produce Appendix 'F' to AFO 5/97 (corrigendum 1/99 to AFO 9/99) with the counselling register maintained in the SAC(U) (office of the 2nd respondent) during 2005 as per the provisions of AFO 5/97, AFO 9/99 and other


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial