S P - Judgment Search Results

S.P. Dhandapani Vs. Prema

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2004Mad187; 2003(4)CTC729; (2003)2MLJ726

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Prema filed a suit in O.S.No. 161 of 1990 against one Dhandapani for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from running the electric … ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Prema filed a suit in O.S.No. 161 of 1990 against one Dhandapani for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from

S.P. Sankar and ors. Vs. S.P. Subramani and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2006Mad268

ORDERM. Chockalingam, J.1. This application is made by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of an Advocate Receiver to take charge of the property described in the Schedule to the plaint, … ORDERM. Chockalingam, J.1. This application is made by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of an Advocate Receiver to take charge of the property described in the Schedule to the

S.P. Thirunavukkarasu Vs. S.P. Loganathan and Another

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1992Mad328

J.1. A learned single Judge of this Court has ordered for grant of probate of a will. One S. P. Shanmugha Mudaliar was a businessman in Madras. He executed a registered will on 26-5-1971 in the presence of … sound disposing state of mind and body.'The other attesting witness P.W. 3 was the Manager of the firm S. P. Shanmugham and Sons, belonging to late Shanmugha. His evidence has been considered by the learned single Judge in

M.S.P. Rajesh Vs. M.S.P. Raja and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1994)1MLJ216

Thangamani, J.1. The family of Rao Bahadur Senthilkumara Nadar of Virudhunagar is one of the richest in this part of the country. It owns extensive extents … Thangamani, J.1. The family of Rao Bahadur Senthilkumara Nadar of Virudhunagar is one of the richest in this part of the country. It owns extensive extents of plantations in Shervaroy Hills and Kerala besides other assets including

M/S. P. P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. M/S. P. P. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

(Circuit Bench at New Delhi) Honble Shri Z. S. Negi, Chairman: The above mentioned two rectification applications are filed by the same applicant for removal … register under section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). During the pendency of the applications, the applicant has filed miscellaneous petitions in both the rectification applications being M.P. No. 37/2008

M/S. P.P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S P.P. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

(CIRCUIT BENCH SITTING AT DELHI) S. USHA, VICE CHAIRMAN: 1. The above miscellaneous petitions were heard by the then Honble Chairman … (CIRCUIT BENCH SITTING AT DELHI) S. USHA, VICE CHAIRMAN: 1. The above miscellaneous petitions were heard by the then Honble Chairman and the Technical Member and on 30.7.2010, an order was passed.

M/S. P. P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. M/S. P. P. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

(Circuit Bench at New Delhi) Honble Shri Z. S. Negi, Chairman: The above two rectification applications are filed by the same applicant for removal of … under section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. During the pendency of the applications, the respondent/petitioner in both the applications has filed miscellaneous petitions in both the rectification applications

S.P.Rm.M. Meyappa Chettiar Vs. S.P.Rm.Rm. Ramaswami Chettiar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad96; (1940)2MLJ494

Patanjali Sastri, J.1. The only point for determination in this revision petition relates to the applicability of Article 61 of … Patanjali Sastri, J.1. The only point for determination in this revision petition relates to the applicability of Article 61

P.S.P. Piranmalai Rowther and anr. Vs. S.P.N.M. Mohamed Ibrahim Rowthe ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1936Mad105; 160Ind.Cas.684

the learned Election Commissioner in this case was wholly without jurisdiction. Rule 10 of the rules for the settling of disputes about Elections to Local Board is as follows:2. If in the opinion of the Election Commissioner(a) … as follows:2. If in the opinion of the Election Commissioner(a) the returned candidate, his agent or any other person with the connivance of such candidate or agent, has committed, or abetted the commission of any Election offence

M/S. P.R. Deb and Associates Vs. Sunanda Roy

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IIAD(SC)535; AIR1996SC1504; JT1996(2)SC684; 1996(4)KarLJ726; (1996)2MLJ3(SC); 1996(2)SCALE551; (1996)4SCC423; [1996]3SCR163; (1997)2MLJ3

ORDER1. Civil Appeal No. 4631A of 1993 is by original defendant to the suit challenging the decree of specific performance which has been passed in appeal by the High Court of Calcutta … Civil Appeal No. 4631A of 1993 is by original defendant to the suit challenging the decree of specific performance which has been passed in appeal by the High Court of Calcutta against the appellant. The judgment and