S Corporation - Judgment Search Results

M/S.Corporate Development Forum vs Union of India, New Delhi

Court: Kerala

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 10TH BHADRA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 28083 OF 2006 PETITIONER/S: M/S.CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT FORUM REG.NO.R.595/06, SURYA GARDENS APARTMENT,,

M/S Corporate Strategies vs Smt Parvathi B

Court: Karnataka

2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7664 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. CORPORATE STRATEGIES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REGISTERED UNDER ACT - 1958, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.2139, 15TH CROSS, 22ND MAIN, … DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7664 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. CORPORATE STRATEGIES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REGISTERED UNDER ACT - 1958, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.2139, 15TH CROSS, 22ND

McDonald's Corporation repr. by Its Attorney Ms. Shiela M. Lehr and Mc ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR3346; 2007(5)KarLJ638; LC2007(3)153; 2008(37)PTC247(Karn)

interference, the brief facts of the case are set-out as under:4. i) The first plaintiff is a multi-national corporation of USA and the second plaintiff is its Indian subsidiary. The first plaintiff established its business all over … 11413/1998 questioning the correctness of the Judgment and Decree dated 15-10-2004 passed by the trial Court dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs and prayed to set aside the same by allowing this appeal and to decree the

A.S. Corporation and 3 ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2008(223)ELT26(Guj); 2009[15]STR378

Central Excise on 13/12/2004, wherein the subject matter mentioned was Maltreatment & torture to the partners of A.S. Corporation, a trading firm, not registered with the Central Excise Department. It is not necessary to enter into the … D.A. Mehta, J. 1. Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to amend page No. 1 of the petition. Permission granted.2. This petition under Article 226 of the

M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. Vs. M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant/petitioner in an Application under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenges order dated 15.10.2015, passed by the learned Company Court in Company

M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. Vs. M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant/petitioner in an Application under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenges order dated 15.10.2015, passed by the learned Company Court in Company

McDonald's Corporation Vs. MacGilz Fast Food

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)133PLR622; 2003(26)PTC547(P& H)

J.S. Narang, J.1. The appellant has filed a suit for seeking relief of perpetual injunction for infringement of trade mark, passing off and that for alleged such … been recognised and mentioned in the book 'World Class Business - A Guide to 100 most powerful Global Corporations'. McDonald's is also listed in the Guinness Book of records as the word's largest chain of Restaurants. The

N.S. Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(20)LC471(Bombay)

Matched in: Parties N.S. Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and

N.S. Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT509TriDel

Matched in: Parties N.S. Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise

N.S. Corporation, Mumbai Vs. Commissioner Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

duty.2. This question has already been answered by the Tribunal in its decision in appeal E/12/93-C of the same appellant (N.S. Corporation Vs. CCE), holding that dilution with water did not result in changing the nature of