S Corporation - Judgment Search Results
McDonald's Corporation repr. by Its Attorney Ms. Shiela M. Lehr and Mc ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-18-2007
Reported in: ILR2007KAR3346; 2007(5)KarLJ638; LC2007(3)153; 2008(37)PTC247(Karn)
interference, the brief facts of the case are set-out as under:4. i) The first plaintiff is a multi-national corporation of USA and the second plaintiff is its Indian subsidiary. The first plaintiff established its business all over … 11413/1998 questioning the correctness of the Judgment and Decree dated 15-10-2004 passed by the trial Court dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs and prayed to set aside the same by allowing this appeal and to decree the
A.S. Corporation and 3 ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-23-2005
Reported in: 2008(223)ELT26(Guj); 2009[15]STR378
Central Excise on 13/12/2004, wherein the subject matter mentioned was Maltreatment & torture to the partners of A.S. Corporation, a trading firm, not registered with the Central Excise Department. It is not necessary to enter into the … D.A. Mehta, J. 1. Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to amend page No. 1 of the petition. Permission granted.2. This petition under Article 226 of the
M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. Vs. M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jan-29-2016
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant/petitioner in an Application under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenges order dated 15.10.2015, passed by the learned Company Court in Company
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. Vs. M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jan-29-2016
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant/petitioner in an Application under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 challenges order dated 15.10.2015, passed by the learned Company Court in Company
McDonald's Corporation Vs. MacGilz Fast Food
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-24-2002
Reported in: (2003)133PLR622; 2003(26)PTC547(P& H)
J.S. Narang, J.1. The appellant has filed a suit for seeking relief of perpetual injunction for infringement of trade mark, passing off and that for alleged such … been recognised and mentioned in the book 'World Class Business - A Guide to 100 most powerful Global Corporations'. McDonald's is also listed in the Guinness Book of records as the word's largest chain of Restaurants. The
N.S. Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-18-1985
Reported in: 1989(20)LC471(Bombay)
Matched in: Parties N.S. Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and
N.S. Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-1998
Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT509TriDel
Matched in: Parties N.S. Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise
N.S. Corporation, Mumbai Vs. Commissioner Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-12-2001
duty.2. This question has already been answered by the Tribunal in its decision in appeal E/12/93-C of the same appellant (N.S. Corporation Vs. CCE), holding that dilution with water did not result in changing the nature of
S.S. Corporate Securities Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Feb-28-2005
Reported in: (2006)66SCL211SAT
and Section 4(3) of the SEBI Act, do hereby suspend the certificate of registration granted to S. S. Corporate Securities Ltd., for a period of 3 months." 3. The brief facts of the case is that on … 2. The appeal is against the impugned order dated 21st September, 2004 of the Adjudicating Officer appointed by SEBI which inter alia reads as follows: "Therefore, I, in exercise
National Technical Research Organisation vs M/S Corporate Infotech Pri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
Delhi Development Authority & Anr13 and the decision of this Court in Vishal Engineers Builders v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited14 to submit that even where a contract provides for liquidated damages, compensation must be reasonable and cannot … ORGANISATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG with Ms. Arunima Dwivedi CGSC, Ms. Pinki Pawar GP, Ms. Himanshi Singh and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates, Mr. Amit Kumar (NTRO) and Mr. Bhaskhar Ghosh (NTRO).versusM/S CORPORATE INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free