S C V Has - Judgment Search Results
Dr S.C.V. Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-27-1997
Reported in: JT1997(4)SC575; 1997(3)SCALE503; (1997)4SCC337; [1997]3SCR397
ORDER1. Leave granted. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, made on … ORDER1. Leave granted. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore … 50% by Direct Recruitment. However, the said 1976 Rules have been amended vide Notification No. AAH 161 ADO 77, dated 8.9.1978 altering the ratio to
S.C.V. Subramanyam Naidu Vs. Incablenet Thirupathi Private
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: May-30-2005
Reported in: (2006)130CompCas606
1. This company petition is filed under Section 111(3) and (4) of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") seeking directions against M/s Incablenet Thirupathi Private Limited … 1. This company petition is filed under Section 111(3) and (4) of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") seeking directions against … the forged signatures of the second respondent and, therefore, it has no validity at all. The share transfer stamp affixed on the reverse of the
New Galaxy Netcom Represented by Its Proprietor Mr. A.N. Sathyanarayan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-15-2009
Reported in: AIR2009Mad183
of the Act. (iii) Star India (P) Ltd. (1) v. Sea TV Network Ltd. and Anr. 2006 (4) S C C 130 :2. Without prejudice to the claims that are being examined in these appeals, let Star India
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prasad Mathew, Prop: Metro Entertainment Network Vs. S.C.V. Unit of Su ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)CTLJ422(Mad); (2003)3MLJ784
ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J. 1. This revision was originally filed under section 115 C.P.C., against the order passed in C.M.A. NO: … 5. O.S. No: 2881 of 2003 was filed on 6.6.2003 for a declaration that the franchise agreement was valid and for a permanent injunction restraining the franchise from disconnecting the link or discontinuing the transmission or from
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free