S 5 - Judgment Search Results

S.V. Munikrishnappa and Others Vs. S.V. Narayanappa

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1999KAR2461; 1999(6)KarLJ155

present matter covers both the agricultural lands and house property. So far as the agricultural lands are concerned, in the final the event the appeal stands posted to a date beyond 5-4-1999, on production of a copy of this order, the learned

S.V. Matha Prasad Vs. S.V.R. Saroja and Others

Court: Chennai

has been rendered on merit. A perusal of the above said decision, as rightly taken note of by the learned single 369); (3) Muthiah Chettiar Vs. Krishnadas Varu, (AIR 1921 Madras 599 (Full Bench); (4) Shreenath Vs. Rajesh, (AIR 1998 SC 1827).''

S.V.R. Saroja and Others Vs. S.V. Matha Prasad

Court: Chennai

by way of reply, the learned counsel for the applicants submitted that it is incorrect to state that the power of deal with only the following questions_ 1)Whether the delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is liable to be condoned?

S.V. Chandra Pandian and ors. Vs. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1993(1)ARBLR386(SC); 1993(41)BLJR543; [1995]212ITR592(SC); JT1993(1)SC278; (1993)1MLJ41(SC); 1993(1)SCALE141; (1993)1SCC589; [1993]1SCR58

partnership business. The firm owned both movable and immovable properties. Sometime thereafter the three brothers created a Trust with themselves as granted a stay against the operation of the award on 5th September, 1984.6. Against the judgment of the learned Single Judge,

S.V.R.Saroja Vs. S.V.Matha Prasad

Court: Chennai

that there is no building in the land and as such the claim regarding purchase of property by tenant by invoking 2&3 : Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan,SCGSC For Respondent No.4 : Mr.R.Arunmozhi For Respondent 5to9 : Mr.R.Natarjan for M/s.S.Hemalatha ***** COMMON JUDGMENT SATHISH K. AGNIHOTRI,

S.V.S. Oil Mills Represented by Its Partner S.V. Chandrapandian Vs. S. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC330(Mad)

entered into between S.V. Chandra Pandia Nadar, S.V. Kasilinga Nadar, S.V. Ramachandran, S.V. Natesan. In respect of the said award, so firm of Sivalinga Nadar & Bros. 27. Disputants 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall be entitled to use the name of

S.V.S. Oil Mills, Rep. by Its Partner, S.V. Chandrapandian Vs. S.V.N. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2004)3MLJ543

the products of the plaintiff. Learned counsel also referred to several features which are found in the label of the defendants a suit and interim injunction was granted in O.A. No. 505 of 2001 in C.S. No. 433 of 2001 by order

S.V.S. Oil Mills Vs. S.V.S. Agro Refineries P. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC41(Mad)

name and as such objecting the respondents from using the said name is not sustainable in law besides unreasonable. In the of the respondents which is as follows:- 'Disputants 3, 4, 5, and 6 shall be entitled to use the name of

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

of an interest ceasing on the death of the deceased shall..... (a) if the interest extended to the whole income of Rs. 500. It may be that the withdrawal of Rs. 500 every month was as a result of some kind of

S.V. Steel and Vessel Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT448TriDel

heard Shri Srivastava, learned DR for the Revenue.4. It is settled position that in case of job worker 10% on labour