Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

S 5 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1993

S.V. Chandra Pandian and ors. Vs. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-11-1993

Reported in: 1993(1)ARBLR386(SC); 1993(41)BLJR543; [1995]212ITR592(SC); JT1993(1)SC278; (1993)1MLJ41(SC); 1993(1)SCALE141; (1993)1SCC589; [1993]1SCR58

were carrying on business in partnership in the name and style of Messer's Sivalinga Nadar and Brothers and S.V.S'. Oil Mills, … Chandrapandian - Schedule 'C' 4. S.V. Kasilingam - Schedule 'D' 5. S.V. Ramachandran - Schedule 'E' 6. S.V. Natesan - Schedule


Dec 12 2013

S.V.R.Saroja Vs. S.V.Matha Prasad

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-12-2013

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. .12.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.A.No.630 & 657 of … 2&3 : Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan,SCGSC For Respondent No.4 : Mr.R.Arunmozhi For Respondent 5to9 : Mr.R.Natarjan for M/s.S.Hemalatha ***** COMMON JUDGMENT SATHISH K. AGNIHOTRI,


Jun 16 2016

S.V.R. Saroja and Others Vs. S.V. Matha Prasad

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-16-2016

of 2015 has been filed by the applicants under Judge's summons under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Section 151 … Section 151 of CPC, praying to condone the delay of 54 days in preferring appeal against the order dated 17.09.2014 passed


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Mar 04 2016

S.V. Matha Prasad Vs. S.V.R. Saroja and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-04-2016

(Prayer: Original Side Appeal in O.S.A.No.73 of 2015 is filed under Clause 15 … Civil Appeal, the appellant was arrayed as the 3rd respondent. 5. Pending Civil Appeal No.224 of 1974, the sole appellant died


Mar 17 1999

S.V. Munikrishnappa and Others Vs. S.V. Narayanappa

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-17-1999

Reported in: ILR1999KAR2461; 1999(6)KarLJ155

ORDER1. In a suit for partition, preliminary decree has been passed. The subject-matter covers … the parties shall appear before the learned Appellate Judge on 5-4-1999 for further directions by the learned Appellate Judge and to


Jun 28 2004

S.V.S. Oil Mills, Rep. by Its Partner, S.V. Chandrapandian Vs. S.V.N. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-28-2004

Reported in: (2004)3MLJ543

entitled to temporary injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, marketing, selling and advertising its products by using the trademark as shown … some other getup and colour scheme for marketing their products. 5. As already stated, the plaintiff has filed an application for


Jul 20 2001

S.V.S. Oil Mills Represented by Its Partner S.V. Chandrapandian Vs. S. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-20-2001

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC330(Mad)

1. O.A. No. 324 of 2001 has been filed by S.V.S. Oil Mills, represented by its Partner S.V. Chandra Pandian against … firm of Sivalinga Nadar & Bros. 27. Disputants 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall be entitled to use the name of


Jun 27 2001

S.V.S. Oil Mills Vs. S.V.S. Agro Refineries P. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-27-2001

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC41(Mad)

either as domain name or as website use the expression S.V.S. either as prefix or suffix and pass off their edible … J. 1. This application for interim injunction in O.A. No. 505 of 2001 in C.S. No. 435 of 2001 is filed


Dec 13 1990

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-13-1990

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

Ratnam, J.1. In these tax case references under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to … mill to the deceased Rajammal and the drawal of Rs. 500 per mensem by her for maintenance clearly indicated that the


Jan 04 2024

S.v. Samudram Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-04-2024

REPORTABLE2024INSC17IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8067 OF2019S.V. … 1,77,300/- Rs. 1,77,300/- 4 Payment on idle machinery Rs.98,500/- Rejected 5 Payment of extra expenses on Rs.24,000/- Rejected procurement of water


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial