S 19 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: s 19 Page 1 of about 499 results (1.117 seconds)Maina Devi Vs. Jaswant Singh (deceased by L.R's)
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: AIR1989Raj23
of the appellant against the firm vadilal manilal in june 1928 the decree holder died leaving behind him two sons named
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTulsi Dass Ahuja (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs & Anr. Vs.chattar Si ...
Court: Delhi
..... as respondents while i take up first this issue of section 19 of slum area improvement clearance act question for consideration is ..... withdrawn the petition at that stage and sought permission under section 19 of the slum act thus landlords having changed their position ..... of the appellants defendants of the suit being barred under section 19 of the slum act even if appellants defendants are permitted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Himachal Pradesh. Vs. Nishant Sareen.
Court: Supreme Court of India
..... suffer harassment on false frivolous concocted or unsubstantiated allegations the exercise of power under section 19 is not an empty formality since the government or for that matter the sanctioning authority ..... no merit in this appeal and it is dismissed prevention of corruption act 1988 sections 19 7 13 2 previous sanction necessary for prosecution leave granted the competent authority thus .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Prakash, Balrampur Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, New De ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow
..... 1 the present original application is preferred by the applicant u s 19 of the at act with the following reliefs i issuing passing of ..... he has issued three sanction memo of withdrawals dated 18 7 95 19 7 1995 and 22 7 1995 for rs 500 each respectively and ..... the applicant submitted an appeal to the director of postal services on 19 2 2004 and the appellate authority has also considered the appeal of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarshan Singh Vs. Nachhattar Singh and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
..... 2004 and the rights of the defendant no 2 are protected u s 19 b of the specific relief act and section 41 of the transfer of ..... agreement executed the sale deed dated 13 10 2004 so the agreement dated 19 11 2003 is prior to the date of alleged agreement dated 01 10 ..... sell the property in dispute to defendant no 2 vide agreement dated 19 11 2003 for a consideration of 64000 per bighas and executed an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRishi Pal Singh Vs. Harinder Pal Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
..... against the officials of mcd who had demolished the internal wall on 19 6 2007 and that is why major penalty proceedings against the ..... an employee of the mcd to get the internal wall demolished on 19 6 2007 when the front portion of the first floor was ..... a disproportionately larger portion in occupation as compared to the appellant s 19 we find that the endeavour of the appellant is to somehow .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBachan Singh Kunjam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
..... of time bound pay scale has been provided by the state government by circular dtd 19 4 1999 and as per the scheme the time bound pay scale has to be ..... writ petition no 1860 2008 s 19 12 2012 none for the petitioner shri rahul jain learned deputy advocate general for respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYagya Narayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
1 writ petition no 1035 of 2009 s 19 2 2013 shri d k gangrade learned counsel for the petitioners shri a k sharma .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPunjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh Through Its Registrar Vs. Sta ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
..... the haryana state information commission had jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate an appeal under section 19 3 of the rti act against the orders passed by the appellate authority under the high ..... 704 of 2010 o m 2 ii whether the remedy of second appeal u s 19 3 of the rti act against the order passed by the appellate authority under the high .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr.D.J.Brahmachari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
writ petition no 3998 2008 s 19 12 2012 none for the petitioner shri rahul jain learned deputy advocate general for respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial