S - Judgment Search Results

S. Vs. Naik V. Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: 195629ITR206(Hyd.)

dated December 12, 1953, and are not impressed by them. Section 60A deals primarily with avoiding any hardship or anomaly removing

Nk vs.s

Court: Delhi

petitioner husband.5. No possibility of any amicable settlement at this stage between the parties appears. The counsels have been heard on

S. Vs. Veerappan Chettiar and Another V. Commissioner of Income-tax, M ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1957]32ITR411(Mad)

penalty is no doubt provided for under Chapter IV, but such levy is not assessment under Chapter IV within the meaning

A vs.s

Court: Delhi

learned Family Court. The respondent present in Court submits that she worked as a Teacher prior to her marriage but did

B. Vs. S.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: I(1997)DMC620

among .the parties towards the other in the matter of sex is an important factor in the married life. Insistences of

S. Vs. P. N. Sithambara Nadar Sons V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]67ITR45(Mad)

to sub-section (7) should be treated as an independent provision standing by itself, and relying on the words 'an assessment', pressed

S. Vs. M. Seyed Cassim, and Others V. Income-tax Officer, Karaikudi.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1963]50ITR473(Mad)

of the mischief of section 44D(1) of the Act by section 44D(3) thereof. It is stated in the petition that following

S a vs.m A

Court: Delhi

the said Act, pending adjudication before the learned Family Court.11. stand disposed of. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. The pending applications

S. Vs.m.k.

Court: Delhi

one has to consider the evidence in matrimonial disputes. (emphasis supplied) 23. The Court has further held that to constitute cruelty,

S vs.V

Court: Delhi

statements made by the witnesses in examination-in-chief against him for sending him to jail. Law does not allow such thing to