Ruling - Judgment Search Results

Fisher Vs. Rule

Court: US Supreme Court

homestead entry thereof at the local land office. Under the ruling then and for many years prevailing in the Land Department,

The Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking

Court: Delhi

application before the learned Single Judge either under Order 9 Rule 13 r/w Section 151 CPC or under Section 5 of

Praveen Rule Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education

Court: Madhya Pradesh

observation made by this Court in paragraph 4 of the order that when an element of public interest is created and

“hence the Rule (Sic. Present) Case Is a Revolving Around the Deposi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

25.1.2012, which, in substance, is as under :- “Hence, the rule (Sic. present) case is a revolving around the deposing of

“that a Decree for Declaration to the Effect That Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Courts to examine these aspects and wherever necessary make requisite rules, regulations or practice direction so as to provide appropriate guidelines

Advance Ruling P. No. 14 of 1997, in Re

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1998]234ITR335(Delhi)

A large number of decisions were cited, relating to well-known rules of construction of a taxing statute. What is important to

Tej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93

The application purported to have been made under Order XXI, rules 100 and 101, and Section 47 of the Code of

Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle Vs. Snyder

Court: US Supreme Court

Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Snyder - 227 U.S. 497

Parker Vs. Rule's Lessee

Court: US Supreme Court

Parker v. Rule's Lessee - 13 U.S. 64 (1815) U.S. Supreme Court Parker

Chakkunny, (Surety) Vs. Viswanatha Iyer, (Decree-holder)

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1961Ker312

treated on the same footing as the agreement itself the rules of contract do not apply in their entirety nor do