Ruling - Judgment Search Results

Fisher Vs. Rule

Court: US Supreme Court

of Rule applied for and secured a preliminary homestead entry thereof at the local land office. Under the ruling then and for many years prevailing in the Land Department, he had six months within which to establish

The Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking

Court: Delhi

a situation where, really speaking, there is no application before the learned Single Judge either under Order 9 Rule 13 r/w Section 151 CPC or under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 as the appellants have

Praveen Rule Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education

Court: Madhya Pradesh

1997(3) SCC 571. He particularly relied on the observation made by this Court in paragraph 4 of the order that when an element of public interest is created and the institution is catering to that element, the

“hence the Rule (Sic. Present) Case Is a Revolving Around the Deposi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the respondent-accused, vide impugned judgment of acquittal dated 25.1.2012, which, in substance, is as under :- “Hence, the rule (Sic. present) case is a revolving around the deposing of Sh.J.C.Jain, ADV, DHBVNL (PW1). He has deposed that

“that a Decree for Declaration to the Effect That Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2013 litigation. It is for the High Courts to examine these aspects and wherever necessary make requisite rules, regulations or practice direction so as to provide appropriate guidelines for the subordinate courts to follow.”. Thus, it

Advance Ruling P. No. 14 of 1997, in Re

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1998]234ITR335(Delhi)

a body like the applicant which has been incorporated under the laws of the country outside India. 115JA RULING The applicant herein has made this application raising following questions before this authority :Whether the provisions of section

Tej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93

to them as they had been wrongfully dispossessed. The application purported to have been made under Order XXI, rules 100 and 101, and Section 47 of the Code of Civil-Procedure. The learned Munsif to whom the application

Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle Vs. Snyder

Court: US Supreme Court

Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Snyder - 227 U.S. 497 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Ruling of Fraternal

Parker Vs. Rule's Lessee

Court: US Supreme Court

Parker v. Rule's Lessee - 13 U.S. 64 (1815) U.S. Supreme Court Parker v. Rule's Lessee, 13 U.S. 9 Cranch 64

P.C. Herian vs (Decree Holder) Muthoot Vehicle and Asset Finance Ltd.

Court: Kerala

the year 2014. The attachmentwas effected in the E.P. subsequent to the purchase by the claim petitioner. The decree holder/1st respondent is canvassing a case that, the petitioner herein and the judgment debtors are colluding each other