Rules Committee - Judgment Search Results
imagic Creative (P) Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director M.S. Dileepan V ... Overruled
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-29-2006
Reported in: (2008)12VST366(Karn); 2007(2)KCCR881; 2007-08(5)VATToday83(DB)
same was rejected. Thereafter, subsequent to the survey, an application was filed seeking clarification before the Clarification/Advance Ruling Committee for an advance ruling in terms of the Act before the Committee constituted for the said purpose. The … STC 620 in the case of Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh (and other appeals), would rule in paragraph 24 reading as under.24. In our view, the term 'goods' as used in Article 366(12) of
K.V. Ananthakrushnan Vs. the Registrar, High Court,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-10-2007
Reported in: (2008)1MLJ9
Court also enjoy equal status. Majority of the High Courts are functioning under the Rules framed by the Rules Committee or by the respective Legislature. The High Courts created under a Charter or a Letters Patent are not
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free